User talk:OhKayeSierra/Archive 2

Latest comment: 5 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Administrators' newsletter – March 2019
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

16:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

22:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

21:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

15:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

17:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  JustlettersandnumbersL235
  BgwhiteHorsePunchKidJ GrebKillerChihuahuaRami RWinhunter

  Interface administrator changes

  Cyberpower678Deryck ChanOshwahPharosRagesossRitchie333

  Oversight changes

  Guerillero NativeForeigner SnowolfXeno

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
  • Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

  Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
  • The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
  • Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
  • Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.

23:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

23:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

20:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
  • A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
  • The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

  Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.

17:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

19:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Scrappy Page

Hello Miss, Why is my edit called 'vandalism'? It's true. --71.9.129.27 (talk) 03:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

After taking a second look at the edit in question, I see that I was mistaken in my revert. What originally caught my attention was the removal of a reference in the page. I have reverted the page back to your last edit, and I sincerely apologize for the mixup. OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OhKayeSierra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

23:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Changes to Amber Rudd page

Hi, as it stands, the page is misleading because it omits (in the introduction, after which arguably most readers stop reading) an important fact. The change I had made simply consisted in reporting in the introductory paragraph what is already stated further down. The fact that she resigned as home secretary in connection to the Windrush scandal is a fact and must be reported in the introduction. Conveniently omitting it, while leaving only celebratory statements such as "the fastest-rising politician to a Great Office of State since the Second World War" turns this page into a hidden propaganda piece and not a decent encyclopedic voice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.121.11 (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

@82.27.121.11: Thanks for reaching out to me. To clarify, the only reason that I reverted your edit to Amber Rudd was because you didn’t cite a reliable source for your edit per Wikipedia’s Biography of Living Persons policy. If you are able to cite a source for your edit, there’s no other issue with the edit that you want to make to the article. OhKayeSierra (talk) 21:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

I started reverting vandalism by Ben jamine E 27 27 27 and noticed you already had finished with it. thank you, could you possibly send him a warning message 63.140.88.136 (talk) 08:18, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

@63.140.88.136: Didn’t get a chance to reply to this earlier, but   Done. OhKayeSierra (talk) 16:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

confused

I don't know what you mean by joke edit???? The academy has a crest and I described it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.204.116.125 (talk) 09:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

@109.204.116.125: “The school's crest appears to show either a heron or a stork catching a fish, as well as a tree of indeterminate species.” appeared to have been a humorous edit to me, when I reviewed the edit. If I was mistaken in that assumption, I apologize for that. At any rate, the article’s reader can infer for themselves what the school crest is, and since trivia shouldn’t be included in school articles anyway, I would recommend keeping that sentence out of the article. OhKayeSierra (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Inadvertent?

[46] Well, I took a look after your first request and before you removed it, and semiprotected for a few days. The history looked pretty silly. Anyway. 🙂 Bishonen | talk 20:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC).

@Bishonen: Much appreciated! 😅 OhKayeSierra (talk) 21:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Help please...

I am looking to update our school's information as it is our 50th anniversary and have recently learned how popular Wikipedia searches actually are. I would like to make it look professional.

We have several forms of Social Media that I would like to share along with many of the Noteable Alumni we have and any other form of communication that we can do to reach out to our alumni.

Please help. I am VVVery new to editing in Wikipedia. Any help and guidance is much appreciated.

Thank you. Yolanda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yolandanavas (talkcontribs) 15:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

@Yolandanavas: Generally speaking, Wikipedia tries to avoid linking to social media sites, which is why I reverted the initial edit. If you have any more questions, please feel free to reach out to me! OhKayeSierra (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
@Yolandanavas: After taking a second look at the article and similar articles to other high schools, I found that there was precedent for including social media links in the article, so I added them to the External links section. I also took care of some minor copy-editing to the article. Best, OhKayeSierra (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

OhKayeSierra, I am an unregistered user. I was wondering if you could state that Cardi B is an American rapper, singer, songwriter, and television personality. Also, could you teach me how to start a page? I'm new to Wikipedia. Please and thank you. Solomon32 (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

@Solomon32: There are two possible ways that you can go about this. You are currently only two days and 5 edits away from getting autoconfirmed status on your account, which would let you make all of these edits on your own. If you’re not up for waiting, you can follow the instructions that come up when you attempt to edit Cardi B and make an edit request on the talk page. To do so, go to Talk:Cardi B and make an edit request. Wikipedia:Edit requests is a useful page that can help you format the request correctly. As far as creating an article goes, I recommend reading through Wikipedia:Your First Article to get yourself up to speed on what the proper formatting and expectations for how to reference your article should be. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to me again! OhKayeSierra (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
It should also be noted that, by virtue of having an account, you actually are a registered user now. 😁 OhKayeSierra (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
OhKayeSierra, How many edits am I from getting autoconfirmed status on my account?

Thanks, Solomon32 (talk) 22:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

@Solomon32: It seems that you already have it, from checking Special:UserRights/Solomon32. I’d still caution you to read through Wikipedia:Your First Article before attempting to create a new article, though. OhKayeSierra (talk) 23:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Edits

Hi, I am wondering why the changes that I have made have disappeared again. Thank you. MiaDirewolf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miadirewolf (talkcontribs) 10:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

@Miadirewolf: I looked through your contributions, but I’m having trouble trying to determine what edits you’re referring to. I don’t recall reverting you at any point myself. OhKayeSierra (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, don't know why you revert my editing in Paris section Music. I think it is better for Wikipedia to link to live sources and not to archive.org. I see you want to protect Wikipedia from spam link building, but I don't think, so it is the case. Please, think about it :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Platform.www (talkcontribs) 21:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

@Platform.www: this edit and [47] are inappropriate additions because it changes the reference that was available with an unwarranted link addition. By definition, that’s spam and you could be subjected to a block if you continue to replace references with those links. Because of that, I stand by both of my reverts. OhKayeSierra (talk) 21:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

22:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Paris and Prague

Dear OhKayeSierra. I have thought that is more valuable for Wikipedia to link to live site more than to archive.org, in addition, if the new content is somehow enriched. As you said, the links are nofollow and cannot help me with anything and I know it. Don't worry I'm not a typical Indian guy who spam links anywhere. I did not put to the referenced page any affiliate link or banner etc., I only thought, that it could be helpful for Wiki visitors, cause someone can be confused from the weird archived pages, not everyone is internet professional like we are. What was my motivation? Do not get a link, but get interesting content from archive.org to a site that is thematically similar. Additionally, I think you are badly influenced by the fact that you still have to deal with spam? and you are not 100% objective in this respect. I do not care - I just say it.

And one more thing. if we will be 100% objective, we have to delete 50% of the external links. I can start to do it if you want, check all external links in the main category pages in many industries where the money is spinning, travel, marketing, dieting, etc. and report them if they are suspicious links. I give my neck that 50% are only SEO links.

Have a nice day and all good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Platform.www (talkcontribs) 07:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks For the Thanks

Hello there! Thank you for the feedback on my previous edit! I appreciate it, any other air accidents you need help with send me a message, thanks OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 17:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

You wouldn’t mind assisting me In adding more to the summary on TWA flight 514? OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 17:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

@OrbitalEnd48401: Unfortunately, I am unfamiliar with Aviation accidents and incidents, so I doubt I'd be much help to improving the article substantially right now. However, I'd be more than happy to look over it when I have some free time later in the week. OhKayeSierra (talk) 17:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  Al Ameer sonRandykittySpartaz
  BosonDaniel J. LeivickEfeEsanchez7587Fred BauderGarzoMartijn HoekstraOrangemike

  Interface administrator changes

 Deryck Chan

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
  • Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

  Obituaries


16:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Guidance please

On the medical simulation wiki page all of our competitors are listing their companies and products with links. I am simply doing the same. May I ask how to do this properly? That way, we are all listed there. We are the biggest company of this type and need to be represented. A note was sent to our founder so I must address this in a timely manner.

Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simbionix (talkcontribs) 18:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

@Simbionix: The problem is that you have a conflict-of-interest to the topic, and also that Wikipedia is not a means of advertising your company, nor is it a collection of links. I would encourage you to read the conflict-of-interest page to familiarize yourself with the customs and expectations of editors before continuing to edit in topics related to medical simulation. OhKayeSierra (talk) 18:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
User indef blocked,   Requesting immediate archiving... OhKayeSierra (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

Please don't tag articles as A3 (or A1) until at least 10 minutes have elapsed since creation. At Ø̀ you tagged it one minute after creation. I deleted it anyway because a lot of time has elapsed since your tag, but that doesn't change the standard.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

@Bbb23: My mistake. I’ll keep that in mind going forward when I’m patrolling Special:AbuseLog. OhKayeSierra (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Also, just mentioning for the record that I almost never dabble in new page patrolling (with today being a major exception). The page (and it’s editor) just caught my attention while I was going through the filter logs. OhKayeSierra (talk) 20:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
[57] and Special:AbuseLog/22698430 OhKayeSierra (talk) 20:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Assisstance

Hello again!

I'd like your help wth someone stating my sourcing is inaccurate etc. He keeps going on at me when I provided him proof that the websiote i use for my research is A) Sources. B) Secure so notable accidents are uneditable. I don't like his mannor in which he's trying to attack me.

This is the person here: --> Jetstreamer

I'd appreciate the help, Thank you so much :)

OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 16:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

@OrbitalEnd48401:   I have read the above message. I will reply when I have a moment. OhKayeSierra (talk) 20:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Ma'am thank you so much. I'll be up front with you. I have autism so I have difficulty in understanding things at times.

OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

@OrbitalEnd48401: I took a look at your respective edits as well as the thread at WT:AVIATION. I can certainly understand your frustration with that situation! Where I think the problem lies is that no one has actually explained how citation works on Wikipedia. Citing sources directly in the article is key to ensuring that Wikipedia is a verifiable source for our readers. That being said, edits such as this edit and this edit can make this problematic because, after all, our readers won’t see the edit summary. With respect to whether ASN is an acceptable source or not, I’ll defer to the consensus at WT:AVIATION for that. Again, aviation topics isn’t really my main field of article-writing.
To put it simply, references to your edits are essential, and this tutorial on how to add in-line references explains how to do it much better than I possibly could. Finally, I would suggest assuming good faith in regards to User:Jetstreamer. I think their intentions are good, and that they might not realize that you’re new to editing, or that no one has bothered to explain how references work or how to cite until today. I’d recommend giving them some benefit of the doubt, and likewise, to Jetstream, I recommend you avoid BITE-y behavior with OrbitalEnd48401. We’re all here for the same goal, after all, which is to build an encyclopedia. 😁 OhKayeSierra (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

seriously thanks for the help! vey helpful. this will help me with future edits!!!! ;)

OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Hypernova

I am sorry about accidentally added that link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iplayminecraft512 (talkcontribs) 00:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

20:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Happy New Year, OhKayeSierra!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@Donner60: Thank you for the well-wishes, as well as the work that you do for the project, and I also hope that you have a great and productive New Year! OhKayeSierra (talk) 00:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

  Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

  Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

ACC request

Psst, you still have one reserved since last week. Also happy new year. — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 14:54, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

@AfroThundr3007730: Whoops! Sorry about that! Holiday season has been a little chaotic with family coming into town and whatnot. I’ll be sure to take a look at it later today. Thanks for the heads up! OhKayeSierra (talk) 14:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Verifiable secret sharing

Hello OhKayeSierra,

On April 21st, 2018, you undid an anonymous change to Verifiable secret sharing. https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Verifiable_secret_sharing&diff=837606767&oldid=837606748

Do you recall what the rational for this undo was?

Thanks, RLE64 (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

@RLE64: Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Sorry, but I don’t recall the original reason I reverted this from 9 months ago. On the surface, it looks like an erronous revert on my part, since I don’t see any issues with the anonymous editor’s edit to the page. OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

20:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

GOCE 2018 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2018 Annual Report
 

Our 2018 Annual Report is now ready for review.

Highlights:

  • Overview of Backlog-reduction progress;
  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
  • Membership news and results of elections;
  • Annual leaderboard;
  • Plans for 2019.
– Your project coordinators: Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

 

  Administrator changes

  EnterpriseyJJMC89
  BorgQueen
  Harro5Jenks24GraftR. Baley

  Interface administrator changes

 Enterprisey

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

  Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.

17:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

23:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk to us about talking

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

21:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

  Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

  Miscellaneous


19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)