User talk:Dumelow/Archive 7

Latest comment: 9 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 17 December 2014


The Signpost: 01 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

edit

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

edit

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

edit

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

edit

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

edit


DYK for Henri Vanwaetermeulen

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

edit



Congratulations

edit
  The WikiChevrons
By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for scoring 508 points during the February–March 2014 backlog drive, I hereby award you these Chevrons. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

edit

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

edit


DYK for Joseph Maurice Pambet

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

edit

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

edit
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Léon Amédée François Raffenel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


DYK for Herbert Garland

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 10:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Precious again

edit

in the news
Thank you for quality articles for project Military history, such as Zaian War, and for your regular and interesting contributions to DYK and ITN with a focus on people, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

A year ago, you were the 461st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wow, thankyou so much for taking the time to remind me. It really helps to keep up the motivation to carry on! Cheers, much appreciated - Dumelow (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Wow for the TFA today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Meldon Viaduct

edit

Hey Dumelow, could you cast your engineering expertise over that article? It came to my attention after it was suggested that the old LSWR route from Exeter to Plymouth (of which the viaduct is a part) could be re-opened to bypass Dawlish. It's still a work in progress, but I'm hopeless with the engineering side of it. Could you take a look and make sure I've not got anything muddled up, particularly in the design section? Thanks a lot, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nice article on an interesting structure, I will be sure to pay it a visit if I am ever down that way! I managed to scrape together a little more info from the online ICE archives and Google Books and have added it in. However I am not too sure whether I have explained/linked enough engineering terms to make it understandable! Also some of the info might need changing about/reordering a bit, I am a bit pushed for time. If there's anything you need more background on let me know and I will try to clarify what I meant! I will be away most of the week but should be back on Saturday. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Very much obliged! Thanks for your help (I especially liked the titbit about Ovingham Bridge). I'll let you know if I need anything explaining. This is a bit of a long shot, but do you know of a source that links Meldon and Bennerley viaducts? There are plenty of sources for either of them being one of two lattice truss railway bridges, but none that explicitly make the connection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Managed to check in mid week. Rennison mentions all three bridges on page 31 but doesn't state they are the only remaining. I will see if I can dig anything up - Dumelow (talk) 19:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
This document from the ICE archive says "There are two surviving wrought iron viaducts of the Crumlin type, those at Meldon and Bennerley". In reference to the use of lattices at the Crumlin Viaduct - Dumelow (talk) 19:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have now incorporated this reference into the article - Dumelow (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

edit


DYK for Garland Trench Mortar

edit

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ernest Psichari

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 07:22, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!

edit
 
Hello, Dumelow. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 12:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 12:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Meldon Viaduct

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


The Signpost: 30 April 2014

edit

DYK for Charles Rondony

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Léon Amédée François Raffenel

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:45, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Might be of interest

edit

I remember you mentioned somewhere that you were interested in engineering-y events a while back. Well, Wikimedia UK need some experienced Wikipedians to help with an event with the Royal Academy of Engineering on 23 June. If you're interested, ping Daria at WMUK (daria.cybulska at wikimedia.org.uk) and cc me (harry.mitchell at wikiconferences.org.uk). I know it's a weekday, which might be a headache, but I thought I'd mention it. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


The Signpost: 07 May 2014

edit

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

edit

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Main Page appearance: Zaian War

edit

This is a note to let the main editors of Zaian War know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 12, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at present, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 12, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Zaian War was fought between France and the Zaian confederation of Berber tribes in Morocco between 1914 and 1921. Morocco had become a French protectorate in 1912, and Resident General Hubert Lyautey (pictured) sought to extend French influence through the Middle Atlas mountains towards French Algeria. The war began well for the French, but they incurred heavy losses, including over 600 troops killed at the Battle of El Herri. The French retained most of their territory during the First World War, despite the withdrawal of some troops for service at home and continuing raids by the Zaians, who were supported by the Central Powers. After the signing of the Armistice with Germany in November 1918, significant forces of tribesmen remained opposed to French rule. The French resumed their offensive in the Khénifra area in 1920, and entered negotiations with the Zaians. A split between those who supported submission and those still opposed led to infighting, and the French responded with a strong, three-pronged attack into the Middle Atlas that pacified the area. Some tribesmen fled to the High Atlas and continued a guerrilla war against the French well into the 1930s. (Full article...)

You (and your talk-page stalkers) may also be interested to hear that there have been some changes at the TFA requests page recently. Nominators no longer need to calculate how many "points" an article has, the instructions have been simplified, and there's a new nomination system using templates based on those used for DYK suggestions. Please consider nominating another article, or commenting on an existing nomination, and leaving some feedback on your experience. Thank you. UcuchaBot (talk) 00:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

edit

Request for comment

edit

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

edit

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

edit

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

edit

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:57, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

edit

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

edit

DYK for Alexander Mackay (British Army officer)

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

edit

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

edit


  The 100 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
Congratulations on reaching this significant milestone of 100 article creations! Your impressive output of military and other subjects is making Wikipedia great! Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Cottell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross-section. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

edit


DYK for Battle of Rossignol

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

edit

DYK for Achille Pierre Deffontaines

edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Richard Mohun
added links pointing to Loanda and Katanga

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Achille Pierre Deffontaines

edit

Views Nicely done! 7&6=thirteen () 12:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grand Quartier Général (1914–1919) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • September 1914, during the First Battle of the Marne]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

edit


MilHist coordinator elections

edit

Hi Dumelow, is there any chance I could tempt you to put your hat into the ring at [[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/September 2014]]? It's not a huge commitment when there are a dozen of us and I think you'd be good at it—you're sensible and level-headed, you've got plenty of experience, and it would be good to have some new blood on the coord team. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for thinking of me Harry. I will mull it over for a while and take a look at some of the co-ordinators' tasks. I have a lot on workwise at the moment - have nowhere near as much free-time as I used to and I wouldn't want to commit half-heartedly to it - Dumelow (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

edit

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

edit

DYK for Mike Cottell

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

edit

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

edit

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 September 2014

edit

Congratulations!

edit
 
Coordinator of the Military History Project, September 2014 – September 2015

Hi Dumelow, in recognition of your successful election as a co-ordinator of the Military History Project for the next year, please accept these co-ord stars. Thanks for standing and all the best for the coming year. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 109th (Aberdeenshire) Regiment of Foot

edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

edit

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

edit
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Mohun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oak Hill Cemetery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Paul Emile Diou...

edit

Dumelow,

I feel so guilty about the DYK with Paul Emile Diou. I'm sorry for wasting so much time about the whole notability issue. At any rate, it is now GTG and should finally appear on the main page. Cheers! Étienne Dolet (talk) 06:30, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

No problem, mate. I am glad we were able to settle the matter one way or the other. To be honest it is a fine line with some of the generals I have researched as to whether there are enough secondary sources available to provide sufficient coverage and Diou was close to that. Glad we came to an agreement anyway. Many thanks. PS - think I have solved the name-related confusion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Please help me find the name of these medals! - Dumelow (talk) 18:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

edit

Kasino point

edit

Thank you for deleting the page now it's been superseded. I am working on Capture of La Boisselle here User:Keith-264/sandbox5 and wonder if Lochnagar mine should be treated the same way. I notice thought that it has a Commons page and wonder if the photos can be moved or incorporated into the Commons page for Capture of La Boisselle if the Lochnagar page is deleted? It's a detail a little beyond my Wikimojo.Keith-264 (talk) 08:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

No problem. I have just redirected the page to the Montauban article as I forgot to do so when I deleted it. I am not sure about the Lochnagar page, I think it has sufficient notability to stand alone. The site is a popular stop on tours of the Western Front and receives some 75,000 visitors a year (I visited myself some years back). The article should contain more about its importance as a war memorial than it does at the moment, with the La Boisselle page containing more of the information about the actual mine and subsequent engagements, I think - Dumelow (talk) 09:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

OKKeith-264 (talk) 10:20, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

How about this one? Sausage ValleyKeith-264 (talk) 21:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've done a bit of shifting about, to add material to the Lochnagar page but don't have anything about commemoration I'm afraid, apart from the External links I've added so I'll ask around.Keith-264 (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Nice work on the expansion Keith. I'll take a look and see if I can help out a little. Not sure about Sausage Valley, maybe it has enough stand-alone notability (it is mentioned in a lot of sources but I am not sure about depth of coverage). It might, perhaps, be worthwhile canvassing wider opinion over at the milhist talkpage - Dumelow (talk) 10:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Paul Emile Diou

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

WP:RX

edit

Hi. Are you still looking for copies of the articles you listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request#Genealogy Bank? While I do not have access to Genealogybank.com, I can try and source these articles for you. Please let me know. Regards,  NQ  talk 10:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • "Consul Mohun in Africa". The Times-Picayune. 20 June 1894. p. 10. Retrieved October 20, 2014 – via Newspapers.com.  -  NQ  talk 10:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
NQ, that's brilliant thankyou! If you have any luck with any of the others I would much appreciate whatever you can find. Many thanks for your help - Dumelow (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately, since I can only see the Genealogy bank raw links and not the actual reference, I was not able to get you all the links you requested. From what little I could find, listed in chronological order:
If you have a specific newspaper citation in mind, do let me know. Regards,  NQ  talk 11:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
That is wonderful, thank you very much indeed! I think you have most of the best ones there. If I find any others I will let you know. Thanks again - Dumelow (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
"Uncle Sam's Pawnshop Victims". The Washington Post. 8 Aug 1909. p. 1. Retrieved October 24, 2014 – via Newspapers.com. 

September-October 2014 backlog reduction drive

edit
  Three Stripes
By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your contributions to the WikiProject's September–October 2014 backlog reduction drive, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject award. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 05:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

edit

Neil Douglas Findlay

edit

This is to let you know I've reviewed this article's DYK, and approved it. Well done :)! Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Rossignol

edit

Hi I read this article yesterday. It is good to see 1914 battles getting the attention they deserve. Just one thing: I don't get from the aftermath how this equated to a decisive victory. There doesn't seem to have been any operational side effects. Tactically it seems to have been a comprehensive defeat for the French. Perhaps it should be just victory? Dapi89 (talk) 20:15, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Glad you enjoyed it! I wrote it a little while back so the details aren't particularly vivid in my memory. However you are probably correct, I don't think there was much of an effect on the wider Battle of the Frontiers except that it effectively knocked out one of the best units of the French Army. I have no objections if you want to change the infobox (these things are always subjective anyway), regards - Dumelow (talk) 21:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'd rather not. If, as you say, you need to re-visit the literature you might find that actually it did. And I don't have any of it, so I can't really. I was just asking as a matter of passing interest. But its something you might want to bare in mind lest the reviewer asks. Dapi89 (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
No problem, I intend to give it a once-over it when I get the chance. Thanks for your interest - Dumelow (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Let me know when it's ready for me again. auntieruth (talk) 20:19, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Sorry to keep you waiting Ruth, I have been unexpectedly busy recently and haven't been able to get on WP as much, I will try to keep chipping away at the copyediting as I can. I really appreciate you reviewing the article though, thanks for putting up with me! Will drop you a line when I am happy, cheers - Dumelow (talk) 18:48, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

edit

Your GA nomination of Battle of Rossignol

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Rossignol you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

add notice

edit

DYK for Newton Adams

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Reply

William Spencer Anderson DYK

edit

Approved.Georgejdorner (talk) 02:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

edit

DYK for William Spencer Anderson

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Reply

DYK for Neil Douglas Findlay

edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Reply

Richard Mohun

edit

Hi, I was able to access the Genealogy Bank links you posted at WP:RX. Most of them are duplicates of Congo Cannibals Routed. There is an article from November 5, 1893 of the New York Herald titled "*Hunting down Slave Traders" and another from the July 14, 1897 edition of Emporia Gazette titled "Attended by a leopard. The United States Consul to Zanzibar Creates a Sensation" that looks promising. Please email me for the Pdfs. Regards, - NQ (talk) 22:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Great work on the article btw, and you started working on it in 2008! - NQ (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, email on the way. It's an article I started way back when I was improving Anglo-Zanzibar War to FA status and I have kept coming back to it since. He's an interesting character with plenty of stories to delve into. I would love to eventually improve the article to FA - Dumelow (talk) 22:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

edit

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

edit

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

edit

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

edit

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

edit

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

edit

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

edit

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

edit