Ducksarethebestbird

Welcome!

Hello, Ducksarethebestbird, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Pone.0003666.g001.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pone.0003666.g001.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Women in government. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Voting behavior peer review

The article’s overall status is strong. The existing article covers a variety of sub-topics and has a comprehensive overview of voting behavior. It is well-written, well-organized, and has a good mix of reputable sources. @Ducksarethebestbird draft adds a much-needed expansion on the role of gender in voting behavior. Like the rest of the article, it is well-written, well-organized, and well-sourced. My suggestions are as follows:

• Expand upon “issues especially salient to women.” What are those issues? How might you connect this to post-materialism?
• Towards the end, you describe what is essentially the role model effect. I suggest calling it that and citing some literature to incorporate more sources and legitimize the effect
• The existing section “military voting behavior” does not mention how the military is a gendered career. The second paragraph of "Voting behavior types" mentions that women are more likely to work in public sector jobs, so the military section should mention that men are more likely to be in the military. Military service impacts voting, and is gendered, so it is a notable gendered impact on voting behavior.

The newly drafted section does wonders for the completeness of this article – it addresses a large gap and does so very well. Overall, this is a nearly complete and well-developed article.

Mem0207 (talk) 15:37, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review: Sam (Shirk2)

The article is in a very good place with a lot of nice information that the original Wiki article does not cover. Numerous sources are used and introduced clearly to paint a picture of why women vote differently than men and in different proportions, as well as how that is stratified by race, class, etc. It’s possible that more readings from class could be used to expand the first section here, as well as maybe some data if it is actually feasible to find. This could paint a stronger picture of how different societal factors play into the gender gap in voting (both turnout and choices) in multiple different cases. The section “Gender Bias in Voting” is important but I wonder if it should be left to a different overall article called “Voter Bias” or something along those lines. The article is quite well-developed and only requires minimal editing and additions. ~~~~Sam (Shirk2) Shirk2 (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Voting behavior

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Voting behavior, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Voting behavior, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Multiplicative and Equal representation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)