Cdc

Hi! Leave me a message!

Talk page archive: 1

Gerry Studds

Nice work. Thank you. BLP's need to be accurate and sourced. You improved the Studds article on both scores. David in DC (talk) 14:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Wow- youre back

Its not often we have 3 years break eds return - welcome back - a few things have changed - a few havent :( - cheers SatuSuro 04:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey Im not really here is fine if you are prepared to talk :) - our most problematic limited english indonesian friends seem to choose to remain silent - SatuSuro 00:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Your presence is appreciated already :) SatuSuro 00:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

And it such a relief to see a regular checking and correcting editor around - thanks! SatuSuro 23:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 16:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC).

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 14:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC).

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

See also: Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2011#September 2011

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 00:10, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Why was the page deleted?

I created this article. Why do you say there was short/no context? Clearly I typed in more information!!!!! Please help recover the stuff on that "page". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dy11111 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Books to Prisoners

The article Books to Prisoners has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article does not cite any reliable sources verifying the notability of this organization (or group of organizations?). I searched, but was unable to find reliable sources to add.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

AFD template

What template did you use to close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tube Bar prank calls? I am asking following a question on the help desk. Some closed AFDs are blank on the mobile view [1]. This appears to be a function of the css class used in the wrapping template. The template you used has a different class to the standard {{afd top}} but I can't work out what template it is. The substituted text usually has the template name in hidden comment but this one doesn't. SpinningSpark 02:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Printer font listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Printer font. Since you had some involvement with the Printer font redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. � (talk) 13:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)