Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Oromia Massacres has been accepted

edit
 
2022 Oromia Massacres, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

 DIVINE  06:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Jalisco shootout (June 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bremps! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of common surnames in Africa (October 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Bremps (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jimmyiscute 4556". The reason given for Jimmyiscute 4556's block is: "Vandalism-only account".


Accept reason: I've granted WP:IPBE for 1 week, by which time the autoblock should have cleared. Ponyobons mots 17:45, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Party All the Time, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

What exactly happened? I tried fixing the capitalization and it displays -5164 bytes Bremperor 22:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:2022 Jalisco shootout

edit

  Hello, Bremps. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Jalisco shootout, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Stark has been accepted

edit
 
Aaron Stark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
thanks! Bremps 04:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michelle Lyons has been accepted

edit
 
Michelle Lyons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
thanks! Bremps 03:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Michelle Lyons

edit

On 3 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Michelle Lyons, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Michelle Lyons has personally witnessed nearly 300 executions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michelle Lyons. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Michelle Lyons), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hook update
Your hook reached 25,280 views (1,053.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Aaron Stark

edit

On 4 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aaron Stark, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Aaron Stark's life may have been saved by a friend inviting him in for a blueberry-peach pie? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aaron Stark. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Aaron Stark), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hook update
Your hook reached 23,840 views (993.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

oh, wow, i came here to congratulate you on your first dyk hook hitting the main page, only to realize that your second dyk nomination ended up reaching the main page first, and that your two dyk hooks are currently the two most-viewed non-image hooks of the year so far. congratulations, Bremps! very impressive. dying (talk) 11:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
thank you! your advice and guidance were very valuable. :) Bremps! 17:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:List of common surnames in Africa

edit

  Hello, Bremps. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of common surnames in Africa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Nestor Binabo

edit

On 5 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nestor Binabo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Nestor Binabo's wife was freed by her kidnappers, she was given a bag of fish and told to make her husband peppersoup? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nestor Binabo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nestor Binabo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

👍 Bremps! 00:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne McLellan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Blair. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Profile Photo Yusuf Lule.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Profile Photo Yusuf Lule.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Experimetn

edit

Hello, Bremps

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Experimetn, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ozzie10aaaa}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Experimetn" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Experimetn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 2 § Experimetn until a consensus is reached. Complex/Rational 00:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Thinzar Shunlei Yi

edit

On 31 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thinzar Shunlei Yi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thinzar Shunlei Yi (pictured) hid in the Burmese jungle for a month and joined a rebel militia following the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thinzar Shunlei Yi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thinzar Shunlei Yi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hook update
Your hook reached 33,614 views (1,400.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:27, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image of Walt Nauta that you uploaded to commons was a blatant copyright violation of a copyrighted website, https://www.kuam.com/story/49060758/former-guam-resident-indicted-in-trump-case. You labeled it a US government website despite the page saying All content © copyright KUAM. Your misinformation is disruptive and could lead to you being blocked if it continues. Toddst1 (talk) 00:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

My bad. I did not see the notice. It wasn't intentional, I assumed it was an official portrait because of the American flag at the back and Nauta's status as a federal employee. Bremps... 00:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Regarding deletion of a page

edit

Hi! I had a query/request for you. According do Wiki's page creation policy, a article must have citations to support it, according to my understanding. I came across a page, K. Annamalai which is with regard to a erstwhile Member of the Legislative Assembly (India) in India all the way in 2001. Th entire article has only two references and the personality is hardly prominent too. Frankly, I don't see this article having any relevance on Wikipedia. Hence, I would be grateful, if you could give me your opinion on this being an experienced editor, and perhaps nominate it for speedy deletion. Thank you! ChaitanyaJo (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello @ChaitanyaJo, glad to help.
It does not appear to be notable. It seems to be fairly routine coverage of election results. Earlier, I had linked several sources, but that was a different K Annamalai.
I would recommend nominating it for deletion. Happy editing!
By the way, how did you come across my page?

Bremps... 13:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for replying. I had asked this same question to another admin. He replied that, apparently K. Annamalai is presumed to be notable on wikipedia per WP:NPOL. What do you think? I found you here. ChaitanyaJo (talk) 16:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi @ChaitanyaJo, I'm not an admin.
I was mistaken; we should follow policy here then. I do believe the policy may be unreasonable during times, though. Cheers! Bremps... 16:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I guess so. Thank you for your help. Have a good day ChaitanyaJo (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2023

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Internet minute did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  One of the rules with PROD tags is: PROD is one-shot only: It must not be used for pages PRODed before or previously discussed at AfD or FfD. By the way, thanks for self-reverting after you read the talk page.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it totally slipped my mind. Have a nice day/night! Bremps... 15:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ITN RD stuff

edit

Hello Bremps! I saw you do this edit, which I reverted as that article was already nominated. Please remember to check to see if an article has already been nominated, before nominating it to RD. Sincerest well-wishes! Scientia potentia est, MonarchOfTerror 05:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello @MonarchOfTerror, I suppose I should've been more careful. No hard feelings. Have a good day/night! Bremps... 05:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Good day/night to you too! Scientia potentia est, MonarchOfTerror 05:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Angelo Mozilo

edit

On 24 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Angelo Mozilo, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Simpson Kalisher

edit

On 28 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Simpson Kalisher, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 02:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 6 Foot 7 Foot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

edit
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
 
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tetsuya Yamagami in high school.webp

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Tetsuya Yamagami in high school.webp. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Lil Tay, child rapper.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lil Tay, child rapper.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B3251 (talk) 15:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Lil Tay, child rapper.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Lil Tay, child rapper.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Thinzar Shunlei Yi

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thinzar Shunlei Yi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 23:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Thinzar Shunlei Yi

edit

The article Thinzar Shunlei Yi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thinzar Shunlei Yi and Talk:Thinzar Shunlei Yi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Thinzar Shunlei Yi

edit

The article Thinzar Shunlei Yi you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Thinzar Shunlei Yi for comments about the article, and Talk:Thinzar Shunlei Yi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 20:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Luochahai City

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Luochahai City, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Minorax ??? I was going to create a draft article about Luochahai City, a 2023 single by Dao Lang. It was not a test article, it was a draft. Bremps... 16:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Luis Garavito

edit

On 14 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Luis Garavito, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

image

edit

thanks for removing that image but also saying that you will add one later. i am not exactly an expert on when free use and when not, especially when you fully disclose that the image is in faact copyrighted and you document everything in the upload. i thought i followed all the steps, but if you could help then i could refer to this article and this image for future use by just viewing the history for the future. thanks Iljhgtn (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

this is referring to the aella (data scientist) page just since i realized that i did not mention that Iljhgtn (talk) 14:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Iljhgtn Don't sweat it. Usually, we can only use fair use in circumstances where a free image cannot be produced. For instance, the Notorious B.I.G and Sana'a Mehaidli died without anyone taking a freely licensed image of them, so we use a fair use image on their page. Similarly, Richard Reid and David Berkowitz are both in jail for the rest of their lives, so no one can take a free photo of them. Jho Low is a fugitive, and no one knows where he is, so he also has a fair use photo on his page (since no one can locate him to take a free picture).
Guernica, the Picasso painting, is also under copyright (Picasso's), so we use a fair use image. Any image of Guernica would be under Picasso's copyright, so no freely licensed images can be taken.
On the other hand, Aella is very much alive, and giving high-profile interviews, so we can't upload a fair use image for her. Furthermore, there are freely licensed images of her (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPWiIz6UYs8&ab_channel=ReasonTV) so we definitely can't apply fair use.
Hope this helps. Bremps... 14:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
how do you know that they are freely licensed? how do you search for that? do you google, "free licensed pictures of John Doe" and then thats it?
i see that link has this on it, but i haven't looked for that before, at least not on YouTube videos "License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)"
Does that mean we are free to take a screenshot from that video? if so, what is the best way to do that? Pause it and screen shot then use the upload wizard and follow all of the promotps? Iljhgtn (talk) 18:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
You can filter by "Creative Commons licenses" under "Usage Rights" under "Tools" if you use Google Images. In Flickr, toggle from "Any license" to "Commercial use allowed".
For the second part of your question, yes. That means they released it under a CC-BY 3.0 unported license, which means we are free to take a screenshot and use it how we wish (after uploading it on Commons with UploadWizard). Cheers, Bremps... 00:10, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Jacob Isaackszoon van Ruisdael - The Jewish Cemetery (1654 or 1655).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 15:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bremps (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

new editor that happens to share my location has apparently been vandalizing Bremps... 16:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your account is not blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Mohammed Deif.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Mohammed Deif.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fan Xiaoqin (November 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lebanese liquidity crisis bank robberies and sit-ins has been accepted

edit
 
Lebanese liquidity crisis bank robberies and sit-ins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

voorts (talk/contributions) 13:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Interesting topic and nice work. Please add a summary section to the article on the Lebanese liquidity crisis and link to this article from there. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 13:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks; will do Bremps... 13:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fan Xiaoqin has been accepted

edit
 
Fan Xiaoqin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Image of Mohammed Deif

edit

You removed the picture from the article Mohammed Deif saying it was a copyvio. How do I know if an image is a copyvio, especially that it has been on Commons for over a years and hasn't been deleted? Thanks. Moazfargal (talk) 20:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I was the guy who nominated for deletion on Commons. It was taken from here, but I forgot to say that on Commons. Bremps... 22:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
(The video, not the article). Bremps... 22:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luochahai City has been accepted

edit
 
Luochahai City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lebanese economic crisis (2019-present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fan Xiaoqin for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fan Xiaoqin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fan Xiaoqin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fences&Windows 20:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lebanese economic crisis bank robberies and sit-ins

edit

On 24 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lebanese economic crisis bank robberies and sit-ins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that people are robbing Lebanese banks to get their own money back? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lebanese liquidity crisis bank robberies and sit-ins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lebanese economic crisis bank robberies and sit-ins), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Alxa League mine collapse

edit

  Hello, Bremps. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alxa League mine collapse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

edit

Hi @Bremps - thanks for adding an image for Oriana Skylar Mastro! I somehow neglected to do it earlier. W9793 (talk) 00:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Luochahai City

edit

On 29 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Luochahai City, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that nobody knows what the song "Luochahai City", which has been streamed 10 billion times, is about? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Luochahai City. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Luochahai City), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Luochahai City

edit

On 29 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Luochahai City, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that nobody knows what the song "Luochahai City", which has been streamed 10 billion times, is about? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Luochahai City. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Luochahai City), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Vick Licata

edit

Hello, Bremps

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Rusalkii and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Vick Licata, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 16 § Vick Licata.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rusalkii}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rusalkii (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

{{owner contacted}}

edit

First of all, thanks for creating this. I proposed a process to keep track of copyright holders who are or aren't willing to relicense their works some time ago, but the idea didn't get much attention. We do have WikiProject Permission requests on Commons, but it seems barely anyone goes there. With this template, we can hopefully prevent people from wasting their time trying to contact copyright holders who already said no.

However, I do have a concern: saying the copyright holder "has not expressed an interest" in relicensing the file might be a bit ambiguous because it could either mean they declined or simply didn't respond. I'm thinking there could be an optional details parameter for documenting our interaction with the copyright holder. Thoughts? Ixfd64 (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Honestly, sounds great. Go for it. Bremps... 13:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done. I also added an owner parameter as well as made some minor working changes. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Big Pun 1999.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Big Pun 1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

edit
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
 
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Young Dirty Bastard

edit

On 19 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Young Dirty Bastard, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Young Dirty Bastard rapped despite Ol' Dirty Bastard telling him not to? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Young Dirty Bastard. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Young Dirty Bastard), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red

edit

Hi there, Bremps, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have another experienced editor as a member. I see that with Michelle Lyons you have already created one biography of a woman. I hope there will now be many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it interesting to look through our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red June 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 09:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Kenneth Law

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Kenneth Law at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RoySmith (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Bremps. Thank you for your work on Kenneth Law. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Notability through sustained media coverage related to assisted suicide. There will no doubt be further coverage as cases develop or are resolved.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

RD

edit
 
story · music · places

Thank you for your support for Éric Tappy, on the Main page and my story today! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red July 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
    Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

regardin Masoud Pezeshkian article

edit

it is good that the article is protected now, but before it was protected the ethnic background of mr pezeshkian was edited and now part of it is removed. please revert it to the previous version inwhich it states both of his paternal ethnic background. please check the last versions of the article historic before it was protected. i hope you revert it and add the correct information again which was sourced well. please check its hometown and paternal ancestry and revert it to the correct version. thanks--Hedayts (talk) 20:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Hedayts, I'd recommend asking at Talk:Masoud Pezeshkian. People there are more qualified. Bremps... 20:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

the source about his ethnc backgroud say:

father of Pezeshkian was Azeri and his mother was Kurdish. please correct it as it was written prior to the protection of the article.--Hedayts (talk) 20:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Hedayts, please ask at the page I recommended above. I don't know much about Iranian internal politics and can't confirm the veracity or quality of sources. Cheers, Bremps... 20:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
There is several videos of pezeshkian saying that both his parents are ethnic Azerbaijanis. The page needs to be changed HistoricalFactCheckX (talk) 16:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kubrick stare

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kubrick stare you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhododendrites -- Rhododendrites (talk) 02:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Shooting of Donald Trump.webp listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shooting of Donald Trump.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, this discussion exploded quickly. See you on the Signpost or even the Wikipedia-beat mainstream press soon. Bremps... 12:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for your kind acknowledgement. I felt so validated and happy for a little while, until I was yanked before AN/I about an hour ago. I pled my case but will probably be reverted. I left a rationale there for why I closed the XFD. I don't think I'm doing anything wrong in stopping by and letting you know. I'm not "canvassing" lol! I won't try to fight them... I hope they don't punish me too severely.--FeralOink (talk) 07:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
ANI scares me too. Bremps... 14:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thomas Matthew Crooks

edit

Please stop reverting my edits, per MOS:INOROUT... I know what the oxford rules are, do you know what the Wikipedia guidelines are? - Adolphus79 (talk) 00:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sincerely sorry, my bad. I didn't see your edit summary. Will stop with the quotation-period swaps. Bremps... 01:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

can you help with another SYNTH issue?

edit

I noticed some defamatory SYNTH was introduced by the last edit, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=1235349208 - no falsities in the video were identified by the source, but the article claims otherwise, making it unsourced defamation. I can't edit the page. Take a look? RememberOrwell (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's not my edit? @RememberOrwell Bremps... 00:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please take it up with @User:M.boli, who made the edit in question. Bremps... 00:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for the confusion, I thought you were accusing me of something. I'll take a look if I have time. Bremps... 00:10, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I could have been clearer! Indeed, just a request for help, not a complaint. I noticed the issue and then noticed that you'd also noticed and resolved SYNTH in the article and thus optimistic you would be open to looking into/addressing it. RememberOrwell (talk) 06:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@RememberOrwell I made a few edits. I think the SYNTH issue is gone. Bremps... 00:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red August 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

DYK for Kubrick stare

edit
 
Brilliant DYK pic! Nicely done, Bremps!   --PFHLai (talk) 14:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

On 26 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kubrick stare, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Kubrick stare (example pictured) can be "invasive" and "troubling"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kubrick stare. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kubrick stare), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PMC(talk) 00:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hook update
Your hook reached 58,566 views (2,440.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for 2024 Gofa landslides

edit

On 27 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Gofa landslides, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 14:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Catch of the Day move

edit

Re this: The only reason I didn't invoke PRIMARY when creating and naming the article was that I didn't think it was proper for me to do that as the article creator. I have no objection to someone else making that call. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Selected anniversaries

edit

I've noticed that you completely remove an existing entry when adding a new one. You're not supposed to do that. You have to move the old entry to the "Eligible" section of the Staging area, so it can be used later. BorgQueen (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please see Wikipedia:Selected_anniversaries#Steps_for_suggesting_new_listings: If you replace a visible entry, be sure you return the one you removed to the staging area collapsible box. BorgQueen (talk) 03:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Baron Nicolas de Gunzburg.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Baron Nicolas de Gunzburg.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The answer to your question

edit

Hi Bremps, in this edit you asked "why aren't we using metric for a British subject?". Please see MOS:UNITS, which says that "In non-scientific articles with strong ties to the United Kingdom...", that "the primary units for personal height and weight are feet​/inches and stones/​pounds". -- DeFacto (talk). 08:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Live and learn, I suppose. The primary reason I removed the information was because I didn't think it was relevant, though. It also was not cited. Bremps... 08:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough on the change, but I thought your question needed answering. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024 at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your GA nomination of Kubrick stare

edit

The article Kubrick stare you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kubrick stare and Talk:Kubrick stare/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhododendrites -- Rhododendrites (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule

edit
Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule
 
  • Administrator elections are in the WMF Trust & Safety SecurePoll calendar and are all set to proceed.
  • We plan to use the following schedule:
    • Oct 8 – Oct 14: Candidate sign-up
    • Oct 22 – Oct 24: Discussion phase
    • Oct 25 – Oct 31: SecurePoll voting phase
  • If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
  • If you are interested in helping out, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections § Ways to help. There are many redlinked subpages that can be created.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Math issue

edit

Just to correct one comment you made [1] .. I believe your math is wrong.

Because 0.001% of 13 million is 130.

Not 13,000.

And 130, out of 13 million, is of course quite uncommon.

0.001%, to be exact. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:C9C6:6A05:7D88:5830 (talk) 09:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

My apologies. I could reopen the discussion at DYK if you would like. Outside of the rarity issue, I'm not sold on height hooks (which would also open the door to making a hook about a short person). Bremps... 05:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for reconsidering, apologizing, and the offer. I'm ok with the bottom line--if you still dislike the height hook, as I would have been with a consensus disagreeing with me as to whether (for a reason I'm unclear on) 0.001% meets the hookiness standard at WP: that it "be likely to be perceived as unusual or intriguing by readers with no special knowledge or interest." That's uncommonly unusual.
And I thought the other commenter's comments were bizarre. He claimed his reason was that it was not unusual (which you unfortunately incorrectly supported - by inflating its usualness 100-fold.
I would appreciate you correcting the record back there, where you made a good-faith mistake supporting his thinking, as the number of such women in Australia appears to be about 12,870 fewer than what you stated.
Beyond that, I'm OK with your hook, if you still maintain that 0.001% is not "unusual."
As to short people, it may be unusual as well. If you think it is pejorative, that could be raised at the DYK. Though I would point out the existence of List of the verified shortest people. It is not pejorative here.--2603:7000:2101:AA00:D4D7:86F5:5AC:BD5F (talk) 06:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's pretty unusual, but I'm still tripped up on the intriguing part. I don't think it leaves the reader wanting to know more of the person. I'll concede the point on the verified list of shortest people, though. Bremps... 15:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Thanks for your response. I would note that the wp hookiness standard, linked to above is not that the hook needs to be "unusual and intriguing" -- which would be the only case in which one might get tripped up as to whether the hook is intriguing. The wp standard is, rather, "unusual" or intriguing." Thus, the hook meets the wp hookiness standard if .. as you note is the case .. the hook is unusual. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:D4D7:86F5:5AC:BD5F (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Let's move the discussion to Talk:Sienna Green#Hook issue. Bremps... 02:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:CCC4:BE78:2FC2:5EF0 (talk) 08:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kubrick stare

edit

The article Kubrick stare you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Kubrick stare for comments about the article, and Talk:Kubrick stare/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhododendrites -- Rhododendrites (talk) 13:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red October 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your GA nomination of Luochahai City

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Luochahai City you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Luochahai City

edit

The article Luochahai City you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Luochahai City and Talk:Luochahai City/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Luochahai City

edit

The article Luochahai City you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Luochahai City and Talk:Luochahai City/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Leticia Sardá photo by Leandre Escorsell.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sarda is still alive, so this clearly falls under unacceptable uses of non-free images.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Based5290 :3 (talk) 06:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Luochahai City

edit

The article Luochahai City you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Luochahai City for comments about the article, and Talk:Luochahai City/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates

edit

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
  • The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi @Bremps, I would like to nominate the article 2024 Kolkata rape and murder as a GA. Since, I haven't made significant edits on this article, I would like to take your consent for the same as per WP:GAN/I#N1.

Best, Macrobreed2 (talk) 04:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections: Discussion phase

edit
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

edit
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red November 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red December 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

DYK for Mohamed Aw-Ali Abdi

edit

On 14 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mohamed Aw-Ali Abdi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mohamed Aw-Ali Abdi (pictured) campaigned in Birmingham, England, while running to become the vice president of Somaliland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mohamed Aw-Ali Abdi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mohamed Aw-Ali Abdi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 08:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC) 00:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading image

edit

Thank you for uploading the image of FoodPharmer for the DYK. It's featured on the main page today. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 16:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Beating of Orlando Bowen

edit

  Hello, Bremps. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beating of Orlando Bowen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red January 2025

edit
 
 
Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply