This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion
Latest comment: 2 years ago9 comments7 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose per OED "ordination" does not "unambiguously refer to clerical ordination by religious bodies", that is only one of eight meanings listed. Also I do not think we should privilege the usage of the Roman Catholic church over everyday English, or the usages of other sects. DuncanHill (talk) 16:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm not suggesting privilege, I'm just saying that if you're gonna have an article that specifically discusses Christian doctrine, canonical aspects, and Roman Catholicism, it's gonna be confusing to people familiar with that terminology that is more precise than colloquial usage. I'm sorry you don't see a problem with that. Elizium23 (talk) 16:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The use of religious as a noun (by the way shared with Lutherans and Anglicans) is not at all common. The context here makes confusion highly unlikely, especially if readers can actually be bothered to read the first sentence. Of course, anyone not reading the article might be confused if they were unaware of the everyday usage of the word "religious", but I think we can take that chance. We are a general encyclopaedia, written for the general reader. DuncanHill (talk) 16:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Weak support: I don't know what the OED says, but when I look up ordination, the principal meaning and usage that I find is about religious ordination. Also, the context makes it clear that this is about the ordaining of people, and I have not seen any identification of other notable topics that the proposed title might be ambiguous with. The Wikipedia article about Ordination is about religious ordination, and Ordination (disambiguation) does not reveal any confusion. As far as I can tell, there has not been a strong need to clarify that, since Religious ordination is a red link! I don't understand some of the other commentary about the word religious, but the title seems more WP:CONCISE and less redundant without it, so I support removing it. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support per BarrelProof. And I'm not sure what the other seven meanings are, but I doubt few, if any, can be meaningfully prefixed by "women's". For example, it could refer to predestination (another religious meaning!) but theologians don't talk much about how God predestines women as well as men. StAnselm (talk) 04:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support - I worked on the list and chose the name. There was formerly a list called Timeline of Women's Ordination that had been deleted, because of copy vio. I created a new list with a new name. I thought the specificity would be helpful but am fine with the simpler list name. Ordination can refer to a statistical method but is more commonly known for its religious connotation. - PMCH2 (talk) 01:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Who was first?
“19th century
“1815: Clarissa Danforth was ordained in New England. She was the first woman ordained by the Free Will Baptist denomination.
“1853: Antoinette Brown Blackwell was the first woman ordained as a minister in the United States. She was ordained by a church belonging to the Congregationalist Church. However, her ordination was not recognized by the denomination. She later quit the church and became a Unitarian. The Congregationalists later merged with others to create the United Church of Christ, which ordains women.” NewBluePencil (talk) 14:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply