Talk:The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Germany may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Holocaust denial

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Holocaust denial is among the list of allegations. For historic reasons, this book cannot have referred to what most people would think of as the Holocaust. If there are no reasons against it, I'd suggest deleting this passage. Johannes Hüsing (talk) 10:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

How about anti-Semitism?

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

How about anti-Semitism? --Ludvikus (talk) 05:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

In what sense? I've mentioned it in the lead paragraph now and there is the big box on the right.--Peter cohen (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see your improvement - of the lead. But I don't understand your question. This text is also universally acknowledge to be anti-Semitic in every sense of the word. If you want a referece, see Warrant for Genocide by Norman Cohn, p. 190. He only uses the word racist there. But it's clearly obvious, and from other sorces I don't have at the moment, that this work is antisemitic in every sense. So I think the "lede" should have that. I think racist applies to any race disparaged. But antisemitism is reserved explicitly against Jews. And this work singles out Jews more that any other race. So please include this categorization in the lede. --Ludvikus (talk) 14:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I've changed things further. I'm surprised you aren't being WP:Bold and doing things yourself. You have edited the article before. As to my question, I didn't understand your previous one.--Peter cohen (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why don't you visit my Talk pages - it would explain to you why I now must now be a "WP:Mouse" instead. Also, you probably could make some good contributions to historical revisionism related articles. But I don't know if you - yourself - could be WP:Bold there! I've made this observation here because of the common link - antisemitism. Do you know what I mean? --Ludvikus (talk) 16:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Do we need the "the" in the title? I forgot the WP style rule on this. --Ludvikus (talk) 05:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Look: "Foundations of the Nineteenth Century." (If it's still Red, shouldn't it be made Blue?) --Ludvikus (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The policy seems to include the article or not based on the actual title of the work in question: The Lord of the Rings, The Go-Between, Der Ring des Nibelungen A Winter's Tale, The Master of Ballantrae.--Peter cohen (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make it blue, you can create a WP:Redirect. (This link tells you how to do it.)--Peter cohen (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done. --Ludvikus (talk) 14:35, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic