| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ritchie Jones article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfer
editIt wasn't a free transfer, it was a Trainee-YT BETA 13:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
According to givemefootball.com, Ritchie Jones is still contracted to Manchester United, though he has been placed on the "transfer list". There is no evidence there to suggest that he will be allowed to leave on a free transfer. – PeeJay 13:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Ritchie Jones has not been offered a new contract by Manchester United which by default means that he can leave on a free transfer as per the FA rules as he is under 23 years old. 81.136.67.201 (talk) 09:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- How do we know that he hasn't been offered a new contract? Unless it's been reported by a reliable source, you're just speculating. – PeeJay 10:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
If Ritchie has been offered a new contract by united then why would they be letting him go on trial to other clubs - you stated yourself that he has been put on the transfer list and his contract expires in the summer. self explanatory i think !!82.17.183.68 (talk) 13:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- What you have just described is the very definition of original research, and is therefore not allowed on Wikipedia. – PeeJay 16:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
your going to look a little bit thick when Ritchie moves clubs in the summer!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.183.68 (talk) 16:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- You already look a bit thick by not knowing the difference between "your" and "you're". Sort yourself out and stop resorting to mud-slinging. – PeeJay 17:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- aint u the student, who gave u the right to correct my grammar, continue to ridicule me and this may become very personal indeed.
- Continue to make threats, and you will find your stay here to be exceedingly shortlived. – PeeJay 17:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- are you threatening me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.183.68 (talk) 17:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, I'm warning you. Your personal attacks against me are not welcome and are punishable with a block. – PeeJay 17:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- are you threatening me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.183.68 (talk) 17:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Continue to make threats, and you will find your stay here to be exceedingly shortlived. – PeeJay 17:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- aint u the student, who gave u the right to correct my grammar, continue to ridicule me and this may become very personal indeed.
Glad we sorted that out I do not take kindly to threats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.183.68 (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm fairly sure you're the one who started with the threats. By the way, all this preening and posing won't get you anywhere either. – PeeJay 17:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Its job done for me !!! think about it haha —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.183.68 (talk) 17:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Then hopefully we won't be hearing from you around here ever again. Grow up. – PeeJay 18:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)