Talk:Night Moves (poetry collection)

DISCLAIMER: This is a draft, I will be working on adding more content and sources in the next week or two and then it will be complete. Thank you. Amk5458 (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Alyssa, can definitely add more Wikilinks in all sections. Lead paragraph is a little weak. Praise and Criticism could use much more content. Mazurr15 (talk) 21:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Great start

Very good start and the formatting looks good too. I like the way information is organized and how how complete the article is even though it's in the draft stage. I don't see a lot more that you need to add. However it may make it feel more complete to add links to things that may be obscure or not widely known. Try adding Bob Seger or YouTube where you would find those phrases the first time in your article. Phoenix5100 (talk) 21:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Lead paragraph: "well-known and beloved" isn't really very neutral. Consider simply stating (and linking) the song here. It doesn't seem to have that Wikipedia tone--it sounds a bit like a review of the book. Content: Original research? I feel kind of bad saying that since there's probably not a lot of content out there for you, but... Praise and Criticism: Citation? Also, I would suggest titling this section "Reception". Animidest (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Was there any reason why Barber wrote this novel? Did she make any changes to the novel? How does she compare to other Uncreative writers? Good start! Should be a good one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nxg6009 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

This is great article, it's very well formatted and has a lot of good information. I don't see the need to really add anything except a few more links and tweaks to make it a more complete and better article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcalopiz (talk • contribs) 22:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

The formatting is very well done, and the article is very visually appealing. You might want to consider adding pictures, of the book and of the author and whatever else you deem fit. You also may want to beef up your sub topic a little bit more, especially your "Praise and Criticism" section Tmarshon97 (talk) 22:21, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Move nostalgia stuff down to reception. use examples from book instead of saying it's nostalgic show how it is. instead of saying it is, say so and so says it is to decrease bias. Amk5458 (talk) 23:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:American Smooth (book) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:46, 12 September 2016 (UTC)