This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article was copy edited by PubliusHadrianus, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on September 10, 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Opening narrative ends with the discovery of the family vehicle, then the next section is an unnecessarily detailed ramble about what appears to be an incoherent conspiracy theory. I have no real objection to that staying, but the discovery of the bodies and the subsequent arrest and prosecutorial theorizing should be presented before any airing of "alternative" narratives, especially when those are given so much space. Kremlintroll (talk) 06:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Per WP:DAILYMAIL I have removed three things sourced only to the Daily Mail, which is an unreliable source we are strongly discouraged from using. One was speculation and two were reported accusations/insinuations. I summarized the second accusation/insinuation since a response to it is cited from a reliable source. This is the removal edit; if better sources can be found, others may wish to reinstate some of the material, although I suspect it will seem less important once there are reports on the trial and its outcome. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2018 (UTC) ... And I made a further removal here after a bot rescued a Mail citation I had not noticed was used elsewhere in the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC) ... and again. With the last edit I added a "citation needed" for unconfirmed sightings. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
