Talk:John Bradfield (engineer)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled
edit- This article was cited (poorly) at a smh opinion piece online on 11 November 2011. Fifelfoo (talk) 04:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Design
editJohn Bradfield did not 'design' the Sydney Harbour Bridge... It was based upon a bridge designed by W G Laws and built in Wylam (opened in 1876). And even then the Wylam railway bridge design was adapted by British firm Dorman Long and Co Ltd of Middlesbrough not Bradfield. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.117.197 (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Bradfield (engineer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120329143906/https://www.sydneywater.com.au/Sustainability/OurHeritageAssets/_item_view.cfm?hi=4570960 to http://www.sydneywater.com.au/Sustainability/OurHeritageAssets/_item_view.cfm?hi=4570960
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.ipswich.qld.gov.au/about_council/media/view_release/?action=viewMediaRelease&id=2717
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 29 December 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 07:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
– Primary topic for usage and long-term significance. The engineer averages ~40 views per day compared with 4 views per day for the others combined. [1] As the designer of a major landmark this is likely to continue to be the case. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 08:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC) —Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support. I agree there is a primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:30, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – four obscure guys by this name; no reason to do a primarygrab on one of them. Dicklyon (talk) 05:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- weak Oppose - it could be that way but it already is this, doesn't need to be tidied. Being OZ he is my primary topic but not necessarily anyone elses. Dave Rave (talk) 08:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Dicklyon plus WP:TITLECHANGES. There is a cost to readers for pageswaps, and no benefit in this case. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Can't see any primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Job or Jacob
editThere are a few matches for Bradfield's name with "Jacob" rather than "Job". Which is correct?