Talk:Inada conditions
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 195.83.197.185 in topic Inada isn't just production functions
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Property 4: concavity
editThe correct property is: . This is equivalent to saying
- the first derivative of the function is decreasing in
- the second derivative of the function is negative
It seems that people think that it is equivalent to saying "the second derivative of the function is decreasing in ". However, this is a statement about the third derivative of , and thus it is unrelated to property 4. Thefroyo (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Example?
editIs it possible to give an example? A concrete function equation and/or plot? E.g. cobb-douglas-style. thanks --WissensDürster (talk) 07:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Added Cobb-Douglas plot. 195.83.197.185 (talk) 10:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Inada isn't just production functions
editDon't utility functions also necessarily satisfy Inada conditions? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 14:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yup, added. Utility functions satisfying Inada conditions also are necessary for an Euler equation for consumption to be well-defined (we have consumption at the denominator, so we need and Inada conditions make sure this happens by having infinite marginal utility at 0), but since this is already very technical I'm not sure how much it would add to specify this. 195.83.197.185 (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)