In macroeconomics, the Inada conditions, named after Japanese economist Ken-Ichi Inada,[1] are assumptions about the shape of a function, usually applied to a production function or a utility function. When the production function of a neoclassical growth model satisfies the Inada conditions, then it guarantees the stability of an economic growth path. The conditions as such had been introduced by Hirofumi Uzawa.[2]

A Cobb-Douglas-type function satisfies the Inada conditions when used as a utility or production function.


Statement

edit

Given a continuously differentiable function  , where   and  , the conditions are:

  1. the value of the function   at   is 0:  
  2. the function is concave on  , i.e. the Hessian matrix   needs to be negative-semidefinite.[3] Economically this implies that the marginal returns for input   are positive, i.e.  , but decreasing, i.e.  
  3. the limit of the first derivative is positive infinity as   approaches 0:  , meaning that the effect of the first unit of input   has the largest effect
  4. the limit of the first derivative is zero as   approaches positive infinity:  , meaning that the effect of one additional unit of input   is 0 when approaching the use of infinite units of  

Consequences

edit

The elasticity of substitution between goods is defined for the production function   as  , where   is the marginal rate of technical substitution. It can be shown that the Inada conditions imply that the elasticity of substitution between components is asymptotically equal to one (although the production function is not necessarily asymptotically Cobb–Douglas, a commonplace production function for which this condition holds).[4][5]

In stochastic neoclassical growth model, if the production function does not satisfy the Inada condition at zero, any feasible path converges to zero with probability one provided that the shocks are sufficiently volatile.[6]

References

edit
  1. ^ Inada, Ken-Ichi (1963). "On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth: Comments and a Generalization". The Review of Economic Studies. 30 (2): 119–127. doi:10.2307/2295809. JSTOR 2295809.
  2. ^ Uzawa, H. (1963). "On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth II". The Review of Economic Studies. 30 (2): 105–118. doi:10.2307/2295808. JSTOR 2295808.
  3. ^ Takayama, Akira (1985). Mathematical Economics (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 125–126. ISBN 0-521-31498-4.
  4. ^ Barelli, Paulo; Pessoa, Samuel de Abreu (2003). "Inada Conditions Imply That Production Function Must Be Asymptotically Cobb–Douglas". Economics Letters. 81 (3): 361–363. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00218-0. hdl:10438/1012.
  5. ^ Litina, Anastasia; Palivos, Theodore (2008). "Do Inada conditions imply that production function must be asymptotically Cobb–Douglas? A comment". Economics Letters. 99 (3): 498–499. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.09.035.
  6. ^ Kamihigashi, Takashi (2006). "Almost sure convergence to zero in stochastic growth models" (PDF). Economic Theory. 29 (1): 231–237. doi:10.1007/s00199-005-0006-1. S2CID 30466341.

Further reading

edit