Talk:Glasgow United F.C.

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Glasgow United Football Club Badge.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Brief controversy"

Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The notion that a widely and reliably reported rape and its significant repercussions, for the individuals involved and for multiple teams and for years now is a "brief controversy" is ludicrous, not to say horrific. In Wikipedia terms it's one of the most WP:N about this article subject, in terms of its impact, with the run-in with the council being as or more widely reported than any football aspects. The wider and continuing story has been resurfacing as the individual has moved from team to team, including in the international press. Why you keep serving to erase this across articles is not pleasant to contemplate. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's a "brief controversy" for Glasgow United. Here we have an 130 year old club reduced to some brief controversy over David Goodwillie in the lead. If it had serious consequences for Glasgow United then I would have no problem with it being in the lead. As it's a year later and Susan Aitken's threats have proven empty then it should have no place in the lead let alone the article. Dougal18 (talk) 14:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic