Talk:Facial width to height ratio

Latest comment: 3 months ago by 2003:C1:9F3F:972:6F22:ED84:2B68:886E in topic Latest edit on association of fWHR and testosterone

pseudoscience

edit

this so called "theory" is about as rational as believing in unicorns 217.250.182.112 (talk) 19:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


Latest edit on association of fWHR and testosterone

edit

The edits from May 2nd, 2018 changed the article from "fWHR is linked with testosterone" to "fWHR is not linked with testosterone" while replacing the reference for the claim. However, the reference does in no way confirm the absence of association between fWHR and testosterone in general, as it only analyzes the relationship for adolescents. Hence, the article needs to be edited, most likely along the lines of "There is mixed evidence on association between fWHR and testosterone ..." with a new reference, but I am not familiar with the literature to cite the proper articles. However, if no one will make the edit in the next few weeks, I will at least change the text in the article to "mixed evidence" (leaving the reference which is not best suited but states this in the literature review), as the article is AFAIK stating false information right now. Thank you! A.Mehli (talk) 09:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

There is another study that says testosterone is not associated with fWHR.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329686209_Further_Evidence_that_Facial_Width-to-Height_Ratio_and_Global_Facial_Masculinity_Are_Not_Positively_Associated_with_Testosterone_Levels 2003:C1:9F3F:972:6F22:ED84:2B68:886E (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reference 6 doesn't support claim in article

edit

The article claims that "some have found little correlation" and refers to reference 6. However the referenced study reaffirms these findings in general population, but finds that the correlation disappears within highly selective populations (specifically NHL players). charon (talk) 10:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply