Talk:Deshastha Brahmin/GA4

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

• Closing as Delist per this. AIRcorn (talk) 10:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Factually accurate

This is a quickfail criteria for WP:GA. The article has far too many unsourced statements, as indeed it did at the three GA nominations. Cirt failed the first two, and the third was initially failed for the same reason but then Zuggernaut managed to push it past the reviewer, who appears to have been new to the process. - Sitush (talk) 07:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Neutrality and stability

My own recent edits, let alone those of other contributors, amply demonstrate that the article is not stable. Those edits also suggest that it may not be neutral and certainly indicate that a fair number of sources were misrepresented. - Sitush (talk) 07:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

I agree. Also, the recent edits(last 24-48 hrs) by the IP address user have further deteriorated the quality. Please see the new section in the talk page for examples. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

opinion from non-admin: I am not an admin hence I do not know if I am allowed to edit here. I have been trying to cleanup this article for the last one year, and trying to add sources to some outsourced content. This article as it stands currently is definitely not WP:GA and needs a lot of fixes. I agree with Sitush. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 13:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your thoughts. Anyone can comment at a Good Article Rewview or indeed a GA Nomination. Same applies for Featured Articles. I'll let this run a few more days but I would be surprised if anyone thinks its listed status is viable. As you may have seen, I did mention this review at WT:INB on 16 May. - Sitush (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Sitush: in case this has been forgotten. AIRcorn (talk) 07:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)