Talk:December to Dismember (2006)

Insulting to the intelligence of the reader

This article is nearly unreadable. There are multiple points where the business of professional wrestling is explained as if this were an article on the subject itself (which it is not). If one wanted to know about how an event is scipted, then find another place to do it. It should not be within the contents of an article about an event. 72.77.100.211 (talk) 02:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Version 0.7

This article does not appear to have broad enough appeal to be included in Version 0.7, which includes only the top 1% or so of articles. Walkerma (talk) 05:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

This article has been nominated for Version 0.7 of the offline Wikipedia release but did not meet the standards for importance. It has been put on Wikipedia:Release_Version_Nominations/Held_nominations for further review. Please see that page for details.

ink==Excessive information== Is all this excessive information really necessary? Like, giving the definition of professional wrestling in the first part of the article (which I've taken out) when you can just click on the link to the pro wrestling article and get a better one? No other wrestling-related article gives this kind of information, and I thought Wikipedia wanted to be consistent. I'd say it's easier to clean up one article than clean up all but one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.75.61 (talk • contribs)

See WP:PW/PPVG.--SRX 16:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Bobby's photo

I think it belongs in the Aftermath section, because it is a picture of him with the title AFTER he won it in the event. Feedback ^☎ 17:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

That would inflict with the on air table, which are supposed to be in the aftermath section.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 17:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

How is the on-air talent supposed to be in Aftermath? It has nothing to do with the aftermath. It should be in the EVENT section, because it was the on-air talent of the EVENT. Feedback ^☎ 19:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Bobby's Photo Part 2

I think there should be a picture of Bobby Lashley with the ECW Championship in the aftermath section while the on-air talent should be in the event section. Feedback ^☎ 19:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Results Section

Someone edited the results section and incorrect information currently resides in this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoundofJustice (talk • contribs) 23:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

WP:FAR?

I just stumbled upon this featured article and, admittedly, I'm not that up to speed on current quality standards for featured articles but, considering the age of this article and the time since its last review, it could definitely use some fixing up. I'll try to repair some of the dead reference links, but will leave it up to someone else to make the decision to nominate it at WP:FAR. -- œ^™ 07:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on December to Dismember (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081220111604/http://media.wwe.com/corporate/200705/shareholders07.wvx to http://media.wwe.com/corporate/200705/shareholders07.wvx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121222044121/http://www.wwe.com/classics/ecw/the-true-story-ecw-relaunch-26078068/page-5 to http://www.wwe.com/classics/ecw/the-true-story-ecw-relaunch-26078068/page-5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on December to Dismember (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081220104006/http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=18&num=16704 to http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=18&num=16704

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)