Talk:De praestigiis daemonum

Adds to Weyer page better? Keep this one brief?

edit

I am planning some adds, including a translation of J Brenz letter to Weyer which he included in the 1577 edition printed in Basel, and references to him by contemporaries like Bodin, and those who came after, like Increase Mather. But am thinking it is probably better to keep this page lean and gather most info on the Weyer page, because Weyer seems synonymous with this book, his life's work. Anyone agree or disagree? Lewismr (talk) 13:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

We don't have much on the subject or author... +sj + 10:40, 27 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on De praestigiis daemonum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply