Wikipedia

Talk:Copa Sudamericana

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Former good article nomineeCopa Sudamericana was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 5, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed

Copa Sudamericana and UEFA Cup

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is Copa Sudamericana the American equivalent to the UEFA Cup? 216.174.165.54 13:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not exactly. The now defunct Copa CONMEBOL was more like the UEFA Cup. However, Copa Sudamericana is the second most important club competition in South America, like UEFA Cup is the second most important European club competition. --Carioca 06:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:Copa Sudamericana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC) After reviewing this article, i find that it currently does not meet GA status. Many parts are unreferenced, including the entire format section. Ideally one cite per paragraph is required. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Intro paragraph about previous winners

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've considerably reduced the length of the last paragraph of the introduction while retaining all the information, because as originally written much of it was either repetition or simply taking a whole lot of words to give not very much info. Here's the original paragraph, with problems boldfaced:

The reigning champion of the competition is Brazilian club São Paulo, after beating Argentine club Tigre 2-0 on aggregate. Argentine club Boca Juniors is the most successful club in the cup history, having won the tournament twice. Argentine clubs have accumulated the most amount of victories with 5 wins while containing the largest number of different winning teams, with a total of four clubs having won the title. The cup has been won by ten different clubs and won consecutively once, most recently by Boca Juniors in 2005.

This reads like someone took a generic template and simply plugged in the appropriate numbers and club names. "I have to have a sentence that reads 'the most successful club has been ____, who have won the tournament ____ times.'" "I have to have a sentence that reads, 'the cup has been won consecutively ____ times, most recently by ____.'" Once it's established that Boca Juniors are the only club to have won the competition twice, then they are obviously the most successful club in the competition. Once it's further established that Boca won the trophy consecutively, then they are obviously the only club to have done so, and it's just bizarre to further call them the "most recent" club to have done so. And once we're told that four different Argentinian clubs have won, then obviously that means Argentine clubs have won the trophy on five occasions. I was able to trim the graph down to about half its prior length. Binabik80 (talk) 18:18, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Actually, none of the facts stated in the original version is obvious unless you know the history of the winners, which, considering that it is on the intro, an average reader would not know. If you don't know the history of winners, then it's not obvious that Boca is the most successful club with two titles; it is not obvious that Argentine clubs are the most successful in the competition; and it is not obvious that since Boca won it twice in a row, they have been the only club to do so. These are things you would have to state outright. Digirami (talk) 07:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Copa Sudamericana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copa Sudamericana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Copa Sudamericana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copa Sudamericana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Copa_Sudamericana&oldid=1198719347"