Talk:Chalfont St Peter A.F.C.
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.clubwebsite.co.uk/chalfontstpeterafc01/History. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Dpmuk (talk) 06:52, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Players and Managers
editPlayers and managers were added and then removed. Refrences provided for all so no reason it can't be used?
- Squadlists for clubs at this level are rarely kept up-to-date, and so get outdated very quickly. The referencing is irrelevant, as the squad will likely change in the near future. Number 57 19:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
As mentioned to you around 8 times Number 57 which you have not replied to. Please check Harefield, Northwood, which makes the point valid. Irrelevant or correct? How can you say the squad will change in the future? Can you see into the future?
- If the entire squad can be referenced (by which I mean using a reliable source, not just the "say-so" of someone claiming some kind of "credentials"), and an {{as of}} date is given, I can't see much harm in the listing being included. The primary objection would be to the inclusion of squad members who can't be verified. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 08:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
The entire squad is refrenced, for the 13th time, in a document the programme from October 2020 once again! How is that not a reliable source? Have you checked the links that are refrenced? Yes i agree on the squad numbers as they are not valid at this level of football, or do you know that as well? The club's website is here [1]. The programme in question is here [2]. I'd advise Rambling man and Number 57 checking this before future questions or assumptions. Can you also reply to Harefield,Northwood etc by me as you seem to avoid questions where you are both proved to be incorrect?
- I'm only asking for RS, that's it. Nothing more. But the tone of the IP is such that I'm out. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 09:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
All i asked for was an answer to the question? But it seems you can't provide an answer to being proved incorrect?
- What are you talking about? Work on your tone and you might get some help around here. Meanwhile, goodbye, and stop pestering me on my talk page. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 09:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Any update on this query to resolve? The club's website is here [3]. The programme in question is here [4]. How otherwise can it be refrenced? I am keen to resolve and have this updated on the page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.24.222.82 (talk) 12:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://www.chalfontstpeterafc.co.uk/first-team-menu/match-programmes.html
- ^ https://www.chalfontstpeterafc.co.uk/first-team-menu/match-programmes.html?task=download&file=chal_match_report_pdf&id=182
- ^ https://www.chalfontstpeterafc.co.uk/first-team-menu/match-programmes.html
- ^ https://www.chalfontstpeterafc.co.uk/first-team-menu/match-programmes.html?task=download&file=chal_match_report_pdf&id=182
- I still don't think this is a good idea. The issue for me is not the sourcing, it is keeping it up to date; past experience has shown this is not done, despite often vehement protests from the editors wanting to introduce it that they will. Also, please familiarise yourself with WP:NLT and withdraw the threat of legal action. Number 57 12:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keeping it up-to-date is a non-starter for me, Number 57. Any article with updatable information suffers that same problem. Or, if you're worried the info will grow stale, do the updates yourself.
- The issue I see is verifiability. I reviewed the most recent program, for the 24 October match. While it includes a list of players, it does not provide information on their nationalities or, for many of them, positions. We would be left with a roster that is just a list of names—or a roster template with blank positions and nationalities for 80% of the roster. Based on what I see of the discussion here, the bulk of the editors feel that is not enough to justify having a list, with only the one unregistered editor disagreeing. Thus, I see a consensus to keep the roster out of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 15:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Ok still find it makes no sense, when a club in the same league has it but not this, but i can't be bothered keep arguing with people who don't see sense in this situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:14EE:F00:6CC2:BD8A:8918:A1A1 (talk) 13:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Other stuff exists. It may very well be that there is verifiable information for the other club(s); however, we don't add material to this article just because similar material is in similar articles. —C.Fred (talk) 15:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
The other page- Northwood [1], Harefield[2] we both sourced in the same way as this page. Thus makes no sense. Must be a one for all otherwise it's bandit country for creating content. I just don't understand the logic being applied at all here by C.Fred or Number 57. But let's leave it as it's going round in a circle and we are unable to come to a resolution. Craigw87 (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2020 (GMT)
Further to this re me and my role, please see my previous credits for some of the years [3] on FM as a researcher in non-league. Due to the specifics of the game, they do not reveal what clubs we provide data for. Craigw87' (talk) 16:19, 17 November 2020 (GMT)
References
- The Northwood F.C. website appears to support the full roster, at least as far as positions go. I didn't check each page, since player data is on subpages. I don't see anything similar at CSP's website. —C.Fred (talk) 19:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
What about the coaching staff? Can this be used as full refrencing is avalible? Player data was obtained from Football web pages and the program. Can FWP be used a reference as it has been on pages such as Hendon FC for player records? Craigw87' (talk) 08:27, 18 November 2020 (GMT)
- I'm not sure we need a table when a prose sentence will suffice, since I only see three names (manager, assistant manager, and coach) in the last programme. —C.Fred (talk) 18:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
So are we ok with a table for coaching staff then? In the refrence document it confirms all staff-manager,assistant,coach,goalkeeping coach and physio. —Craigw87 (talk) 10:39, 24 November 2020 (GMT)
- I added one, using the format from Norwich City F.C., but I omitted flags. —C.Fred (talk) 16:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)