Talk:Bhoja
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bhoja article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{WP India}} with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 10:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Bhojas were classed as Ahirs.
editBhojas were classed with the Ahirs and belonged to Yadu group.
The metaphysical magazine, Volume 16-page-333
Ponwar
editKing Bhoja is descendant of paramara dynasty of Ponwar Clan which was also called as Pramar dynasty . All sanskrit scriptures specify Pramar for King Bhoja's clan . All Imperial gazetteer and document written during year 1300 to 1700 specify that Bhoja was of the Powar or Ponwar Tribe . King Bhoja was also have the title as Parmeshwara . Parmar can be termed as Kul ( title ) name of King Bhoja . Though he was Ponwar . HistoricalQuest (talk) 07:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- British-era Imperial gazetteers are not acceptable sources in this context -- this has been discussed several times at WP:RSN. Which doucments from "1300" call Bhoja a "Ponwar"? utcursch | talk 13:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
As I know Panwar or Punwar is specified as name of Bhoja's dynasty in Ain a Akbari written by Abu fazal . Bhoja was 21st king of Panwar dynasty . Please refer - https://books.google.co.in/books?id=-PjiAAAAMAAJ&dq=++bhoja+++21st+king
Raja Bhoja is belongs to gurjar clans
editBhoja is belongs to gurjar clans 42.111.36.168 (talk) 07:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- And your WP:Reliable sources for that claim are? - Arjayay (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes you are correct there is no proof of Rajput’s existence before the 16th century Harshitbhati2006jik (talk) 02:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)