Talk:Andy Harper
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Jons63 in topic This page appears to be vandalised
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_in_Australia.png)
.svg){kind=logo}
Notability
editHarper is not important enough to have his own page IMO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.224.87 (talk) 10:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This page appears to be vandalised
editThe last few sentences of this appear appear to be vandalism.
210.49.47.26 09:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes - They appear to be, but I (along with many others) think most of it is still true. Keep it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.3.196 (talk) 13:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- But since it is questionable and unsourced about a living person it must be removed per Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Jons63 (talk) 13:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)