Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification (inter-confederation play-offs)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
editMany in the footballing community have critized the allocations. As CONCACAF and CONMEBOL are much stronger regions than either the OFC or the AFC.
As much as I pretty much agree with the statement, it is a statement and should probably be deleted if there's no source.--EricPZ (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
As there is no source then yes it should be deleted, it's all a matter of opinion, which doesn't belong on wikipedia. Druryfire (talk) 19:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
In a two legged match there is no need for a section for qualification scenarios. The winner of the home-and-home series qualifies. You may list the tiebreakers should the the match be tied on aggregate goals (away goals) but otherwise it's fairly common sense to see that the winner of the home-and-home series qualifies to the world cup. Qualification scenarios are only appropriate in group stages. 70.168.184.89 (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Correct capitalisation
editPlease move this page to 2010 FIFA World Cup qualification (inter-confederation play-offs). --62.204.152.181 (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup qualification which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)