Talk:2009 Football League Championship play-off final

Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review
Good article2009 Football League Championship play-off final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 21, 2020Good article nomineeListed
May 23, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
January 22, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Can someone fix the kits? I can't work out how to do it.

Sources

edit

Orphaned references in 2009 Football League Championship play-off Final

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2009 Football League Championship play-off Final's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "soccerway":

  • From Martin Paterson: 2009 Football League Championship play-off final at Soccerway
  • From Brian Howard (footballer): "Brian Howard". Soccerway. Perform Group. Retrieved 16 January 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:26, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cheers bot. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 19:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2009 Football League Championship play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 16:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Will be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 16:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit

Background

edit

Match details (Background)

edit

First half

edit

Second half

edit

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 18:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

MWright96 cheers, much appreciated as always, I've addressed/responded to everything above. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
@The Rambling Man: Now promoting to GA class. I've fixed a few errors in one of the changes made to the article. MWright96 (talk)