Submission declined on 28 December 2024 by CommunityNotesContributor (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 23 August 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 4 months ago. | |
Comment: Per previous comment, there is no significant coverage from secondary sources. To establish notability per WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC, the subject requires significant coverage from multiple secondary sources. The only additional source added since the previous declined submission is routine game coverage at best and does not help to establish notability, similar to the Football League World article unfortunately. All the best. CNC (talk) 11:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Source 4 (BBC) doesn't even mention the subject; all other sources seem to be press releases or data bases; they don't discuss the subject, and thus, I don't think they can be used to establish notability. Currently, the draft fails to demonstrate notability per WP:SPORTBASIC. Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
| Personal information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Full name | Abraham Kanu[1] | ||
| Date of birth | 3 July 2005 | ||
| Place of birth | England | ||
| Height | 1.91 m (6 ft 3 in) | ||
| Position(s) | Centre back | ||
| Team information | |||
Current team | Reading | ||
| Number | 32 | ||
| Youth career | |||
| –2024 | Reading F.C. | ||
| Senior career* | |||
| Years | Team | Apps | (Gls) |
| 2024– | Reading | 0 | (0) |
| *Club domestic league appearances and goals, correct as of 09:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Abraham Kanu (born 03 July 2005) is an English professional footballer who plays as a defender for EFL League One club Reading.
Career
editKanu made his debut in a First Round EFL Cup defeat away to Colchester United on 13 August 2024.[2]. He was booked in the 28th minute before being replaced by Tyler Bindon.[3]
On 23rd November 2024, Kanu made his first league appearance coming on as a 68th minute substitute for Amadou Mbengue in Reading's win 2-1 win over Peterborough United.[4]
Career statistics
edit- As of match played 23 August 2024[5]
| Club | Season | League | National Cup | League Cup | Other | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Division | Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | Apps | Goals | ||
| Reading | 2024–25 | EFL League One | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
References
edit- ^ "Reading FC | Men". 10 February 2021. Retrieved 23 August 2024.
- ^ "League Cup First Round". www.bbc.co.uk. BBC Sport. 13 August 2024. Retrieved 23 August 2024.
- ^ "Setback shouldn't define Abraham Kanu". footballleagueworld.co.uk. Football League World. 13 August 2024. Retrieved 23 August 2024.
- ^ "Peterborough 1-2 Reading". www.bbc.co.uk. BBC Sport. 23 November 2024. Retrieved 23 November 2024.
- ^ "Abraham Kanu - Player Profile 24-25". transfermarkt.co.uk. transfer markt. Retrieved 23 August 2024.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.