Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Hampshire/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators. All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:28, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation

This message is being sent to WikiProjects with GAs under their scope. Since August 2007, WikiProject Good Articles has been participating in GA sweeps. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the GA criteria. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.

We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.

If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Utilities sections?

Could someone review these contributons that are adding "utilities" sections to a load of MH and Mass articles. Unencyclopedic if you ask me. Regards, --SGGH ^ping! 15:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

I second the notion that this is unencyclopedic, and smacks of WP:NOTDIR. If someone is moving to a given town, apartment complexes and real estate agents typically give this information out. Tckma (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

They will need to all be reverted if consensus agrees. SGGH ^ping! 22:47, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree that the utilities listings should be removed. One reason Wikipedia is not a directory is that that sort of information can become inaccurate very quickly. I've already seen several changes in the New Hampshire town articles, but only for certain towns, leading to what would be very uneven coverage statewide. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I removed the July 1, 2009 'Utilities' entries on the attached list.Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I removed the July 2, 2009 'Utilities' entries on the attached list.Wkharrisjr (talk) 18:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators. All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation

This message is being sent to WikiProjects with GAs under their scope. Since August 2007, WikiProject Good Articles has been participating in GA sweeps. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the GA criteria. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.

We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.

If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Utilities sections?

Could someone review these contributons that are adding "utilities" sections to a load of MH and Mass articles. Unencyclopedic if you ask me. Regards, --SGGH ^ping! 15:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

I second the notion that this is unencyclopedic, and smacks of WP:NOTDIR. If someone is moving to a given town, apartment complexes and real estate agents typically give this information out. Tckma (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

They will need to all be reverted if consensus agrees. SGGH ^ping! 22:47, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree that the utilities listings should be removed. One reason Wikipedia is not a directory is that that sort of information can become inaccurate very quickly. I've already seen several changes in the New Hampshire town articles, but only for certain towns, leading to what would be very uneven coverage statewide. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I removed the July 1, 2009 'Utilities' entries on the attached list.Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I removed the July 2, 2009 'Utilities' entries on the attached list.Wkharrisjr (talk) 18:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Please see the "scope of WP:Boston" discussion

An editor has suggested that the scope of the WP:Boston project be changed from a focus on the history and culture of the City of Boston to the entire census-defined Boston MSA, which covers large areas within the scope of this project. WP:NH project members, please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boston#Scope to express your views. Sswonk (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello all

Just joined, my fiance lives here so might as well take a look see. Can find plenty of photos of the Portsmouth, Dover, York, Rye area if they are needed. Is there a to-do redlink list anywhere? S.G.^(GH) _ping! 20:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

List of United States federal courthouses in New Hampshire

This list is largely complete, but has bits and pieces of information missing, and needs images filled in - any help in completing it would be much appreciated. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:07, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Error in Footnote?

In the article, it says Southern NH Univ is ranked 3rd tier by US News and World Report with a reference to footnote [8} but if you click on that footnote link, the report by US News & World Report says right there on the front page (to the right) that it is a Tier 1 school.

Barkway (talk) 23:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Sept 4th, 2010

New Hampshire articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the New Hampshire articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to help with WikiProject United States

Hello, WikiProject New Hampshire/Archive 5! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject United States, an outreach effort which aims to support development of United States related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thanks!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

A consideration for cross project consolidation of talk page templates

I have started a conversation here about the possibility of combining some of the United States related WikiProject Banners into {{WikiProject United States}}. If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know. --Kumioko (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

US Collaboration reactivated & Portal:United States starting next

Casliber recently posted a suggestion on the talk page for WikiProject United States about getting the US Wikipedians Collaboration page going again in an effort to build up articles for GA through FA class. See Wikipedia:U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTM. After several days of work from him the page is up and ready for action. A few candidates have already been added for you to vote on or you can submit one using the directions provided. If you are looking for inspiration here is a link to the most commonly viewed articles currently under the scope of Wikiproject United States. There are tons of good articles in the various US related projects as well so feel free to submit any article relating to US topics (not just those under the scope of WPUS). This noticeboard is intended for ‘’’All’’’ editors working on US subjects, not just those under WPUS.

The next item I intend to start updating is Portal:United States if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. --Kumioko (talk) 19:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Adding "Popular pages" to U.S.-related projects

A very interesting tool of the Wikimedia Toolserver is called WikiProject Popular pages lists. These lists are similar to project-related article lists like U. S. article lists used for generating assessment statistics. The Popular pages lists include the rank, total views, average daily views, quality and importance ratings for the listed articles. Here is the full list of projects using popular pages lists. An FAQ also is available at User:Mr.Z-man/Popular pages FAQ.

I recently added links to lists of popular pages as shown below to the U.S. Portal - WikiProjects box and the nominations sections for each of the selected articles boxes.

---

Portal:United States/Projects/Popular pages

---

Because this project was not included, I am bringing up the popular pages tool here. This tool makes it very easy to track three of four balancing dimensions when selecting articles for showcasing at a portal - quality, importance and popularity. When tracking the fourth dimension, topic, the related article lists tool (such as for U.S. article lists tool) also might be useful by filtering on categories of interest.

If you do decide to use this tool, feel free to update Portal:United States/Projects/Popular pages as well.

Regards, RichardF (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Featured portal candidate: United States

Portal:United States is a current featured portal candidate. Please feel free to leave comments. -- RichardF (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Hollis NH Reevaluation

I think the Hollis article is ready for a re-evaluation. What's the best way to get some feedback from the project on the article? TheNgeveld 01:20, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

New Hampshire Day

Sotheysay (talk) 23:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)SotheysaySotheysay (talk)Hello all I am new to the WikiWorld and looking for some guidance on posting my first piece. Born and raised on the coast of NH is something very special to me. So last year I established New Hampshire Day. This is a day to encourage people of New Hampshire past or present to get out and enjoy themselves. It is a great state that has everything to offer! So with hundreds of followers/participants I an looking to make this even more official. This is NOT in place for me to make money! However, I do encourage people to support local businesses throughout NH while enjoying their activities. Would it be possible to get some recognition for this annual event?

Daniel Webster FAR

I have nominated Daniel Webster for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Brad (talk) 00:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support New Hampshire

Someone recently suggested that this project as well as WikiProject New Hampshire mountains be included in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project it appears that there has been no activity on either that project page or the talk page since 2010. Please feel free to contact me if there are any comments or questions.

If the members of the project do not want to be supported by WikiProject United States I would like to propose adding New Hampshire mountains as a task force of this project. --Kumioko (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

This discussion has been open for 6 days so far with no comments yet. Does anyone have any comments about this discussion? --Kumioko (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

I am not a member of this project and I say go for it along with Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine, Wikipedia:WikiProject New Hampshire Mountains and Wikipedia:WikiProject Vermont. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 02:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Since this discussion has been open for 16 days without opposition I am going to go ahead and add this project to the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. --Kumioko (talk) 13:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate

One or more articles relating to this project have been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving these articles or voting for next months collaboration are encouraged to participate here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Pictures of towns in NH

I was going through many of the articles on towns and places in NH, and I find many "postcard" drawings representing those places as they were in the early 1900s. To give a few examples, look at these articles: Richmond, New Hampshire, Marlborough, New Hampshire, and Hinsdale, New Hampshire. Not all pictures are of these "postcards" but it makes me wonder if it would be more useful to have recent photographs of these locations, in addition to this historical perspective. Lrkleine (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's History Month

Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:New Hampshire will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in New Hampshire's history, society and culture. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 00:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

New brand identity

• Tuohy, Lynne. "Mountain peaks, water make up NH brand identity." Houston Chronicle. Thursday April 12, 2012.

WhisperToMe (talk) 21:57, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Portal:New England was nominated for Featured Portals

Here. Achowat (talk) 19:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposal for United States A-Class review process

There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 02:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Executive Council

Just to let you all know, I created List of members of the Executive Council of New Hampshire yesterday. However, the source that I was working from, a page on the executive council's own website, only listed members from 1901 forward — so I thought I'd bring it to WPNH's attention since you all are likely to have a much better sense of where additional sources might be found for people who served prior to 1901.

In addition, while I wikilinked people on the list whom I was able to locate in Category:Members of the New Hampshire Executive Council, I don't know if there are other people lurking on the list who do have articles but haven't been properly categorized yet. Just as one example, I am not able to properly determine whether the "Robert N. Chamberlin" who served on the executive council from 1901 to 1903 is or is not the same person as the Robert N. Chamberlain who served in the NH House and on the Superior Court — while I realize that it is likely the same person, his article doesn't mention the executive council at all, so given my relatively limited knowledge of NH politics I'm not willing to simply assume anything. If it is indeed the same person, then his article should be expanded to include the information and the category, and his name wikilinked on the list. Bearcat (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template

Greetings, there is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from Template:WikiProject United States. Most of the categories (over 220 Wikipedia wide) were deleted in February 2013 because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged here. Kumioko (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --Orlady (talk) 23:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride

Are there any NH residents interested in participating in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a multi-national effort to improve coverage of LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects? Perhaps an edit-a-thon or a photography project? Please visit the project page for details or let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

New England Wikimedians website

Hey all. I would just like to let you know that the New England Wikimedians user group now has a website. If anyone would like to get involved in an event or suggest hosting something, please let us know there, as we are trying to increase our events in areas outside of Massachusetts and would love to have help organize and host events in the region. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:42, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Expert attention

This is a notice about Category:New Hampshire articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 16:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Question

When Chris Pappas was first elected to the New Hampshire Executive Council in 2012, several media outlets credited him as the first openly LGBT person elected to that body. However, on at least two occasions since his Wikipedia article was created, editors (one signed-in, one anonymous IP) have removed that assertion from his article, both times claiming in their edit summary that he was preceded by Raymond S. Burton.

However, Burton's article mentions and sources exactly nothing about him having been gay, and a Google search offers up exactly zero sources which support the assertion either.

Frankly, I suspect that in reality Burton wasn't gay and the editor(s) is/are confusing him with Raymond Buckley, but I wanted to ask if somebody more knowledgeable about New Hampshire politics could weigh in one way or the other. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, Ray Burton being gay was one of those things that people just kinda knew, but never really bothered to put in writing anywhere... I haven't been able to find any sources to verify it, either, although I had heard it elsewhere before (by word of mouth, which doesn't count)... And while I can see people sometimes mixing up Ray Burton with Raymond Buckley, I don't think that's what's happening here... Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Well, even if it is true, it's unverifiable if we can't source it and thus the distinction still goes to Pappas on the "openly" part of the equation. My suspicion about Burton being mixed up with Buckley had more to do with the similarity of their names than anything else — I don't have the necessary background knowledge to know if they were prone to being confused with each other on any other grounds besides that. Bearcat (talk) 10:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

WP:NH redirect

One can look for WP:NOTHERE and type WP:NH in the search bar, then end up redirected here. Therefore, I think the Redirect template should be added at the top. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 00:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Which Redirect template do you mean specifically? Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 19:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

@Cooljeanius: The normal Redirect template ({{redirect}}). It would be like {{redirect|WP:NH|indications that an user is not here to build an encyclopedia|Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia#Not being here to build an encyclopedia}} under the project header template. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

OK, I see you already added it... LGTM anyways... Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 22:42, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hello all! I was curious if anyone else thought it might be a good idea to make a (nonbinding) guideline on how all the individual US state WikiProjects should organize themselves, to help standardize them. I originally put this suggestion in the WikiProject United States talk page, so feel free to look there if you're interested. It's pretty empty though; basically all they said was to see what each of the individual projects thought about it. Please tell me if you have any concerns with this idea; hopefully we can find a way for everyone to love it! Also, I'm new at making proposals, so please forgive me if I do anything silly. :) Hope that you like this idea! JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 04:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Pageview stats

After a recent request, I added WikiProject New Hampshire to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Hampshire/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the Tool Labs tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 03:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for doing this! I was wondering, would it be possible to have a separate column for views coming from IP ranges known to be located in New Hampshire? It'd be interesting to compare which pages are popular among out-of-staters, vs. which pages are popular with people actually using the internet from here... Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 22:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Henry P. Sullivan

Hello. I've just created Henry P. Sullivan. I would appreciate it if some of you could expand it with more references. His wife was also a Democratic member of the NH House of Representatives, but I can't find her obituary (she died in 1997). Please ping me if you are able to find more. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Missing New Hampshire Supreme Court Justices

Drafts have been created for dozens of missing New Hampshire Supreme Court Justices at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States judges and justices#New Hampshire. Please feel free to complete these drafts and move them to mainspace. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

US 50,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more states than they might otherwise work on. If there's the interest I will start 1000 State Challenges like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of states regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for the US and your specialist/home state like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every state, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any state sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thankyou.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages

Greetings WikiProject New Hampshire/Archive 5 Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

• Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Upcoming "420 collaboration"

You are invited to participate in the upcoming "420 collaboration", which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017! The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion. WikiProject New Hampshire participants may be particularly interested in the following: Cannabis in New Hampshire. For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page.

---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Members of legislature

It looks like this project is moribund but, just in case, does anyone know of a source for past members of the NH state legislature? I've seen an old source claiming that Abel Crawford served as a member, probably in the late 1840s, but I'm struggling to find any modern sources that refer to it. - Sitush (talk) 00:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

No worries - this will do the job for me. - Sitush (talk) 06:57, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Hampshire/Archive 5/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject New Hampshire.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

• The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
• The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
• The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject New Hampshire, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Repeating my response from the archived previous instance of this discussion: Thanks for doing this! I was wondering, would it be possible to have a separate column for views coming from IP ranges known to be located in New Hampshire? It'd be interesting to compare which pages are popular among out-of-staters, vs. which pages are popular with people actually using the internet from here... Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

New New Hampshire userbox templates

New New Hampshire userbox templates are now available at Template:User WP New Hampshire and Template:User WP United States. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk contribs 22:55, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:49, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Greetings from GLAM-Wiki US

Invitation to join GLAM-Wiki US

tight Hello! This WikiProject aligns closely with the work of the GLAM-Wiki initiative (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums), a global community of volunteers who assist cultural institutions with sharing resources with Wikimedia. GLAM-Wiki US is a new community initiative focused on organizing cultural collaborations within the United States. GLAM organizations are diverse and span numerous topics, from libraries and art museums to science centers and historic sites. We currently have a backlog of interested institutions- and we need your help! Are you interested in helping with current or future GLAM projects? Join→ Online Volunteers We hope you'll join the growing GLAM-Wiki community in the US. Thank you! -Lori Phillips (Talk), US Cultural Partnerships Coordinator For more information visit→ The GLAM:US portal or GLAM-Wiki on Outreach

RfC on election/referendum naming format

An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Proposed change to election/referendum naming format. Cheers, Number 57 15:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:28, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Relationship with WikiProject United States

People from a variety of WikiProjects have had concerns about the scope of WikiProject United States and its relationship with other WikiProjects. We have created an RFC and invite all interested editors to discuss it at: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject United States#Mission statement for WikiProject United States. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Racepacket (talk • contribs)

Nobody Is Above the Law

Currently, the Nobody Is Above the Law has a couple sentences about the recent demonstrations in New Hampshire. Are any project members able to confirm if protests were held in other cities, or help flesh out the existing content? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

I organized the Concord one so I'm probably barred from editing the topic per WP:COI... the sentences there look fine already though. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 22:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:New Hampshire

Portal:New Hampshire, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:New Hampshire and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:New Hampshire during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Darn, I didn't see this in time... oh well... Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 22:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Dan Feltes page suggestions

Hi Wikiproject New Hampshire!

My name is Emma and I am on the Dan Feltes campaign. In accordance with the COI guidelines, I am asking that an active editor in this Wikiproject page consider making a few additions to the Dan Feltes page. We've noticed several other pages for both senate majority leaders and prominent legal practitioners in other states have "Awards and accolades" sections on their articles. In an effort to make Dan's page more complete, I've taken the liberty of drafting this section for his page complete with citations. Is someone able to review these proposed edits and institute some or all of them on the article page?

Thank you for your consideration! EmmawithFeltes (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

---

Dan has received several Legislator of the Year awards for bipartisan leadership on many critical issues, including from Ski NH for his work promoting tourism and the ski industry and from New Hampshire Council on Development Disabilities for his work helping persons with disabilities. Additionally, he has received recognition from the New Hampshire Home Builders Association for his advocacy on behalf of the home building and remodelling industry. Housing Action NH recognized Feltes as a 2016 Home Matters in New Hampshire, specifically for his work on an important appropriation to New Hampshire's Affordable Housing Fund. Feltes also received New Hampshire Public Health Association's Friend of Public Health Award in 2018 for being "instrumental in practicing and/or promoting public health in the state" .

Category:Coos County, New Hampshire has been nominated for renaming

Category:Coos County, New Hampshire, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for renaming, along with 28 of its subcategories.

A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Dartmouth College Featured article review

I have nominated Dartmouth College for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Tuck School of Business FAR

I have nominated Tuck School of Business for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 13:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

FAR for The Green (Dartmouth College)

I have nominated The Green (Dartmouth College) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 06:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)