Thank You

edit

Thank You for creating this page

Autoreply

January 2009

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Ice pop worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Welcome

edit
Hello, Iceblock! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ww2censor (talk) 06:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous


AfD nomination of Michele Merkin ASCII art

edit
 
An article that you have been involved in editing, Michele Merkin ASCII art, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Merkin ASCII art. Thank you. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Thanks

edit

Thanks for your help. --Melab±1 19:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. :)

edit

(In response to User_talk:Calaka#TO_NEW_INDIVIDUALS_CONTRIBUTING... – link added by Iceblock (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC))Reply

Hehe thanks. I figured it would stop the amount of people complaining about my actions (I have become quite involved with the new article patrolling pages). I am not sure about expanding the template out to other users, I mean anyone would be more than welcome to use it but I would not know where to suggest it (any thoughts?). Perhaps it would have to be modified and improved if it is to become a wider used table though. Cheers!Calaka (talk) 11:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

PS. I actually decided against adding a skiptocontents template since there is a button at the very top of my page where users can click on to make a new comment. Calaka (talk) 11:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Village pump (miscellaneous) could perhaps be the right place to ask. Iceblock (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Cool cool! I will give it a go.Calaka (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Went ahead and posted it up. Here is the link: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#To_new_individuals_contributing_to..... Calaka (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Earth

edit

I know that everyone knows at least 1 or 2 things about Mother Earth one thing is that we are a big part of her and we need to clean her up when I pass by the roads i see nothig but trash help mother earth please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loverofjonas (talkcontribs) 13:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks, I was not careful. Tom mendel (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Iceblock. You have new messages at Unionhawk's talk page.
Message added 03:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 03:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

Redrose64 (talk) 14:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Apparent longitude

edit

Hello Iceblock,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Apparent longitude for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 17:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Central meridian (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrisGualtieri was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello! Iceblock, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Articles needing attention

edit

Hello,

I am working within the Laos WikiProject for a very limited subject: the Laotian Civil War and its operations/battles, etc. Please, do not expect me to work on random articles on Laos outside that niche.

Georgejdorner (talk) 18:46, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Georgejdorner:The notice is meant as a suggestion to interested (current or future) editors and participants of the WikiProject. It is ok if you do not work on those articles. Iceblock (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Iceblock, I don't mean to come off as a grump. I was just making my intentions clear.Georgejdorner (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Georgejdorner: No problem. Don't worry. Thanks for letting me know. Iceblock (talk) 16:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Central meridian (January 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by APerson was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. APerson (talk!) 19:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Central meridian (planet) has been accepted

edit
 
Central meridian (planet), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Research Invitation

edit

Hello Iceblock,

We’d like to invite you to participate in a study that aims to explore how WikiProject members coordinate activities of distributed group members to complete project goals. We are specifically seeking to talk to people who have been active in at least one WikiProject in their time in Wikipedia. Compensation will be provided to each participant in the form of a $10 Amazon gift card.

The purpose of this study is to better understanding the coordination practices of Wikipedians active within WikiProjects, and to explore the potential for tool-mediated coordination to improve those practices. Interviews will be semi-structured, and should last between 45-60 minutes. If you decide to participate, we will schedule an appointment for the online chat session. During the appointment you will be asked some basic questions about your experience interacting in WikiProjects, how that process has worked for you in the past and what ideas you might have to improve the future.

You must be over 18 years old, speak English, and you must currently be or have been at one time an active member of a WikiProject. The interview can be conducted over an audio chatting channel such as Skype or Google Hangouts, or via an instant messaging client. If you have questions about the research or are interested in participating, please contact Michael Gilbert at (206) 354-3741 or by email at mdg@uw.edu.

We cannot guarantee the confidentiality of information sent by email.

Link to Research Page: m:Research:Means_and_methods_of_coordination_in_WikiProjects

Marge6914 (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Albums articles needing expert attention

edit

Category:Albums articles needing expert attention, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Knut Glomsaas

edit

Greetings from the dutch. There is some some info about Knut Glomsaas in the dutch article if you want some. I found his date of birth in a Runeberg, searching on Knut Glomsås.Ceescamel (talk) 10:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ceescamel: Thanks for letting me know! Iceblock (talk) 03:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radiation laws (April 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 22:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Radiation laws has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Radiation laws. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 22:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Radiation laws

edit

Radiation laws may refer to:

{disambig} OR {SIA} Iceblock (talk) 18:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

From Draft:Radiation laws Special:PermanentLink/713789098

Comment: You might also consider it as a navigation template in addition to or rather than a list or category. Indeed, there may be a navigation template already present, just needing to be bent to your needs Fiddle Faddle 22:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

  • User:Timtrent: Thanks. I will ask somebody at WT:AST to make a template, or to find one that fits. Iceblock (talk) 22:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Blackbody radiation laws has been accepted

edit
 
Template:Blackbody radiation laws, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  talk 21:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Iceblock. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Iceblock. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Iceblock. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:U.S. Roads articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion

edit
 
Category:U.S. Roads articles needing expert attention, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Fredddie 23:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Oncology articles needing expert attention has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Oncology articles needing expert attention has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Articles needing expert attention (category needed) has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Articles needing expert attention (category needed) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Acoustics articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Acoustics articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 16:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:CSI franchise articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:CSI franchise articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Eurovision articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Eurovision articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Soap opera articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Soap opera articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Television stations articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Television stations articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Color articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Color articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 15:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Blu-ray articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Blu-ray articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 15:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:American television articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:American television articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 23:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia:Highest mountain

edit
 

Hello, Iceblock. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Highest mountain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! greyzxq talk 21:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Saudi Arabia articles needing expert attention

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Saudi Arabia articles needing expert attention indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expert-category-notice

edit

 Template:Expert-category-notice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 23:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply