Wikipedia talk:Tip of the day/Archive 5
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
no archives yet (create) |
This is the tip of the day project
To display the tip of the day on your user page, read this Tip of the day tip.
To browse the tip collection, see the complete list of tips.
This project is responsible for developing and maintaining the tip of the day templates which are displayed throughout Wikipedia, and the collection of tips that are displayed by those templates.
If you see a bad or outdated tip please fix it! Be bold!
Project procedures
Here is how this works:
- Those who would like to participate in this project should place the {{totd-tomorrow}} on their user page, which is a template that displays tomorrow's tip of the day (for monitoring purposes) as well as this project's task list (announcement box).
- Submit new entries on this page, below. Please sign your entry, so we can notify you when your tip has been scheduled!
- Please help prepare the new entries below by proofreading and editing the tips for factual accuracy, clarity, readability, and proper formatting.
- The goal of this project is to provide tips and advice for making Wikipedia easier to use, and to help users participate in Wikipedia more effectively.
- Toward this end, we collect useful wikitips wherever we can find them. Do you know an expert on some aspect of Wikipedia's operations? Please ask them to record their favorite techniques on this page (below).
- On the adjacent project page is a list of links to subpages, titled by date. Each subpage has a tip stored in it. The entries with a double-hyphen (--) are old tips (the same ones that were displayed last year). They need to be updated, or replaced with new tips.
- This project has several templates that automatically display the contents of the subpage with the current date. (Templates are pages that get displayed on other pages, duplicated like boilerplate.) The tip of the day is displayed on Help:Contents and Wikipedia:Community Portal.
- When you believe an entry is polished and ready, move it up to the ready to post section, for somebody else to post to the subpages.
- Move entries from the ready to post section (that you actually agree are ready to post) to the tip schedule. To do this, you may replace any tip on the schedule that has a double-hyphen between the date and the tip's title. When you do, change the double-hyphen to a single hyphen.
- If you feel an entry in Ready to post is not ready, move it back down to New entries. Do not post to subpages the entries that you placed in the Ready to post section (unless you are a veteran of this project and have a feel for what makes a good tip). This ensures that each entry is given final approval by at least two editors.
- Entries that are not worthy of this project get moved down to not suitable. Generally, this means that the subject matter doesn't fit here, or the tip is complete nonsense. Include a little message as to why, and your sig.
- If you see an entry under "not suitable" that you agree is not worthy of this project (due to inappropriate subject matter), then delete it from this page. But please do not delete entries that you placed there. This again ensures that at least 2 editors are involved in the decision.
- Keep an eye on the tip schedule. Proofread tips in the queue before they become today's tip! On the schedule, tips with a double-hyphen haven't been proofread since they appeared the previous year. If you think a tip should run again this year, proofread it to make sure it is still accurate, and then change the double-hyphen to a single-hyphen.
Longtime veterans of this project sometimes add tips directly to the tip schedule. Don't get alarmed, they (RichardF, and The Transhumanist) know what they are doing.
Note: Once scheduled, a tip will display automatically year after year. So it is important to update each tip before it displays again, or replace them with new tips if they have become obsolete! See the project page for the whole year's schedule of tips.
User boxes
User boxes for Wikipedian tipsters.
{{User:Greeves/UBX/Tip1}} |
{{User:Greeves/UBX/Tip2}} |
{{User:Greeves/UBX/Tip3}} |
Required formatting
Formatting required for entries: see the Wikipedia:Tip of the day/February 21 entry for the format. In order to allow users with table-formatted user pages to display the tip of the day template without it messing up their page, please do not include headings in the tips. Instead, we'll have to do this the old-fashioned way with <center><big>'''Tip title'''</big></center>. Each entry should also include a link for users to be able to read more about the topic, if such a link exists. And of course don't forget the tip itself, which should take just a paragraph, or two at the most. (These are tips, not treatises). The best tips are one sentence long.
Some good places to find ideas for tips
And one last tip for you tipsters:Have fun! The Transhumanist 04:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Ready to post - individual tips
Try not to use words like greatest and best unless it has been statistically proven. Use (Singer X is considered by many as the best singer) instead of (Singer X is the best singer)
Use your User page to do stuff you can't normally do on Wikipedia. Try out techniques, have userboxes, try out your template skills, and make a user page worthy of Wikipedia!
If you are stumped on what to edit next, try using User:SuggestBot. They, however, need to know what you've edited previously. For other ideas on what you can contribute, check out Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia.
Do you sometimes make edits, without realising that you weren't logged in? There is an easy way to avoid this. Log in, go to preferences, and choose a different skin. Or change the quickbar so it is on a different part of the page. That way, it's obvious straight away whether you are logged in or not. E.g. you may wish to use the Cologne Blue skin.
If another Wikipedian uses the same computer and likes the same skin, one of you could place the quickbar on the right hand side so that it's obvious who is logged in.
Read more: Wikipedia:Customisation#Skins
With this trick you can look up any Wikipedia article directly from any web page by merely highlighting the word you want to know more about and clicking a button! Use the javascript below as a link on your browser toolbar. Make sure you get it all on one line, a simple Copy/Paste will probably only get the first line:
- javascript:q = %22%22 + (window.getSelection ? window.getSelection() : document.getSelection ? document.getSelection() : document.selection.createRange().text); if (!q) q = prompt(%22Enter a Wikipedia topic:%22, %22%22); /* if (q!=null) { location=%22http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/%22 + escape(q).replace(/ /g, %22+%22);} void 0; */ if (q!=null) { WindowObjectReference = window.open(%22http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/%22 + escape(q).replace(/ /g, %22+%22), %22DescriptiveWindowName%22, %22resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes%22); } void 0;
Now, when you highlight any word on a webpage and click this link, a new window will open up with the Wikipedia article for that word! You can also change the URL and have the link take you to Wiktionary definitions, or even perform a Google search on the term (put in "http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=") So there it is, have fun with it!
At some point after you open an account with Wikipedia you'll probably want to "fancify" your signature, make it more "unique". And Wiki allows for a lot of creativity on your part. Read about that at Customizing your signature.
Here's a tip! You might decide to put a space in your sig, perhaps between your Username link and your Talk-page link. Unless you want your sig to "break in two" at the end of a line, don't just hit the space-bar key, use one of Wiki's "non-breaking space" options. It's real easy, and that way all of your sig will completely wrap around to the next line. Now that's keeping your sig together!
Read more about it here: Non-breaking_space
and also here: Wikipedia:Line_break_handling
There might be times when you want to use lines as separators on your pages. Wikipedia gives you the Wiki four-hyphen code, like this: ---- and you can also use the HTML <hr> tag. Watch this...
---- renders as a line all the way across...
<hr> gives the same line...
<hr width=50%> renders...
<hr width=30%> yields...
Many users adore userboxes. And many enjoy creating userboxes. Still others enjoy humorous userboxes. And quite a few enjoy creating humorous userboxes. Have you any problems making jokes? Then use the Wiki Userbox Generator!
Cyde's generator allows you to create userboxes within a limited number of themes. However, many of the images used in the userboxes created may be deleted or moved. Therefore, you must first check whether the picture exists before copying the code onto your userpage!
Happy userbox-creating!
If you want to go to an article in any other language from the current language that you are in, you don´t have to go to that article in the current language and search if it exist in the left language bar, not even be switching between wikipedias, you only have to input the ISO 639-1 prefix of the language of your choice followed by the name of the article (in that language). This will directly bring you to the article in that other wikipedia. For example:
- Placing: "ES:Satélite natural" in the search box ➔ will lead you here (spanish version of: Natural satellite)
-- ☩Damërung ☩. -- 14:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
When writing in their computer, people often make use of contractions. Contractions like "IDK", "lag", "lol", "u" (slang) are obviously not suitable to use in article namespace, however, even common things like: "aren´t", "it's", "should´ve" and others, are neither suposed to be part of an article text, so when writing an article, keep in mind to avoid contractions and other informal writing. Also avoid:
- The use of scrolling lists in article prose
- Using images to display text
- Such phrases as "remember that..." and "note that...", which address readers directly in an unencyclopedic tone
-- Damërung ...ÏìíÏ..._Ξ_ . -- 18:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
An important aspect of Wikipedia is how well articles can be reached from other articles by means of linking. An article that has fewer than three links to it in other articles, however, is called an "orphan," and should be dealt with in a number of ways:
- Tag the article as an orphan using the {{Orphan}} template.
- Create necessary links on other articles to the orphaned article (but make sure they're relevant).
- Remove the {{Orphan}} template from the article when there are three or more links to it.
Keep in mind that links from disambiguation pages, redirects, lists, soft redirects, talk pages, and Wikipedia pages outside of article space do NOT count towards the three links to a given article.
Also, keep in mind some of the ways to avoid creating orphaned articles...like browsing the templates with red links page when considering making a new article.
ARTICHOKE-BOY (Talk) 15:45, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
In the talk page of an article´s section, wikipedia section or portal section (amog others), if you post a question or comment, you will get your reply in that same section. However, some users will reply comments in your talk page instead of their own. This makes reading back a conversation quite cumbersome; having to switch talk pages back and forth in order to make sense of the conversation, something even worse when the discussion involves more than two users. This is why is suggested as a tip to answer a message in the same section it was created.
For this matter, templates such as {{Talkback}}, {{Usertalkback}} and {{Shoutbox}} became useful:
- {{Usertalkback}} - To post the message of this hint in your talk page.
- {{Talkback}} or {{tb}} - To notify other user that you have already replied.
- {{Shoutbox}} - To make smaller comments (avoiding to create a whole new section for that) and even place the {{Talkback}} template inside.
-- Damërung ...ÏìíÏ..._Ξ_ . -- 08:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Occasionally, there are times where a long backlog for speedy deletions exists. Thus, don't panic if a speedy tag you placed on an article isn't acted upon immediately. Other times, a speedy tag may linger for a while because no admin is willing to accept or decline it. Consider taking the article to Articles for Deletion if it is such a case.
ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Bored or tired a bit of writing tons of articles and sections? You can always find funny ways of relaxing here on wikipedia:
- Customize your page or signature
- Sign other guest books (or make your own)
- Search secret pages among other users (some may give you an award)
- Give out some barnstars, or hunt 'em
- Spend some time in the department of fun
- Participate in the Wiki-cup
- Vote or nominate specific things like pictures or articles
- Welcome the newbies
- Join to specific discussions (perhaps in projects, perhaps to arbitrate or give neutral point of view...)
Just remember, wikipedia is not a forum or a blog, so just don´t move too away from wikipedia´s goal and scope.
-- Damërung ...ÏìíÏ..._Ξ_ . -- 08:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
You need to have installed:
- Firefox free open source browser (or Netscape Navigator or Flock)
- Zotero free open source citation manager
Zotero can capture citation data from web pages, including library catalogs (WorldCat) and bibliographic indexes and export them in Wikipedia citation format.
Set Zotero:Actions(cog):Preferences to export Wikipedia citation template.
To cite:
- Show the web page with citation information in your browser
- Click the Zotero icon on the right of address line to capture the bibliographic data to a Zotero item
- Highlight the bibliographic item in the Zotero window
- Use Zotero Quick Copy (Ctrl-alt-C or Cmd-shift-C)
- Click the Wikipedia <ref/ref> button to insert a reference.
- Paste citation into the reference
Voila! A properly contructed wikipedia citation in a few seconds.
--Blouis79 (talk) 23:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Always try to avoid adding Double Redirects. Redirects are special pages that automatically causes the text of another page to be dispalyed in its place. A redirect which leads to another redirect is a double redirect. Wikipedia will not follow the second redirect making it unpleasant for readers.
Read more: Wikipedia:Double redirects
Juthani1 17:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
You can always appreciate another user, and you can always show it with a barnstar! Barnstars are are little award-like templates that have stars and messages in them! They can cheer up someone´s day and encourage that person to keep doing constructive edits on wikipedia (and staying in wikipedia). Barnstars are a joyful way to show recognition to the work of a wikipedian. You don't have to be an admin, in fact you don't have to be logged in! Anyone can hand them out, and remember, if you appreciate others, and you show it, then you can get a barnstar too. (you can also customize them, instead of the usual-given barnstar)
Read more: Wikipedia:Barnstars
If something cannot be done with MediaWiki, HTML can be used!! Simple HTML guide available [1] But try to use Wikipedia Code when you can.
A sysop got you blocked for a reason. Here are some tips on how to get you unblocked and contributing back! First, add {{unblock}} to your user talk page (the only userpage you can edit), and your reason why you got blocked and some things you done accidentally. Then, wait for a sysop to unblock you. BE CAREFUL! Some sysops might decline your unblock by adding a decline reason below your reason. Please try again if you have problems with your sysop blocking.
Read more: Wikipedia:Appealing a block, WP:AUTOBLOCK
PNiddy-~ // My edits 16:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Have you ever been dissatisfied with having to type out user warning templates? Are you not satisfied with the default user interface? Everyone has, so that's why an association of Wikipedians who can program at an advanced level have made a page, WikiProject User Scripts, dedicated to giving you scripts to improve your experience here.
Read more: Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts, WP:TWINKLE
~Steptrip 23:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Do you have workpages in your user space that give the appearance of being in article namespace? Try adding {{workpage}} to the top of that page.
Read more: Template talk:Workpage
Jreferee 22:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
If you've looked at your Watchlist or at Recent Changes lately, you'll notice that after each entry there is a colored number. This number represents the amount of bytes that have been either added or removed in that edit. Usually this is the same as the number of characters added or removed. Green numbers (+xx) show the number of bytes added while red numbers (-xx)show the amount of bytes removed.
Read more: Wikipedia:Added or removed characters
Harryboyles 01:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Although there is no spell checking available within the Wikipedia Edit Page, you can spell check anything which is in a text form (which the edit box is) if you're using the latest Google Toolbar which has a spell check option available.
Also, the 2.0 release of the Mozilla Firefox web browser, now available to the general public at http://www.mozilla.com/firefox, has automatic as-you-type spell checking in all text fields. The spell checking is turned on by default when you install the browser.
JAXHERE | Talk 19:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC) / JDG 22:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps the best navigation aid is one you create yourself. Your userpage can serve as a custom navigation tool: simply add the links you need most to it. Note that there are many ready-made link lists available in the form of Wikipedia:Navigational templates.
For easy access to the above link, add it to your user page.
See also: Wikipedia:Contents,
Wikipedia:Searching, and
Wikipedia:User page
Many resources are available to save you time designing your user page:
- For lists of choices, examples of wikicode, and for links to a selection of very interesting user pages, see User page design
- For personal assistance with your user page and some general help resources, see the User page help WikiProject
For easy access to the above links, add them to your user page.
Read more: Wikipedia:User page
Simply go there and type in your search term:
To make the above link easily accessible, add it to your user page.
Read more: Wikipedia:Searching
Here's a way to get Cite.php references into two columns:
<div class="references-small" style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
<references /></div>
Read more: Wikipedia:References
Do you find yourself working on a lot of related articles, and wishing there were some rhyme or reason to how they were written, internally organized, cross-referenced to each other, categorized in Wikipedia, and templated with useful features like sidebars? You can make it happen! WikiProjects are groups of editors with special project pages for storing guidelines, templates and to-do lists for an entire general topic area, and a Talk page for coordinating on a topic-wide basis.
Starting a WikiProject is easy: Create a page in your userspace, such as User:MyNameHere/Wikiproject Project name, put {{subst:WikiProject|Project name}}
in it, and save. You now have a fill-in-the-blanks Project page. Propose your WikiProject, and recruit active editors who work on relevant articles to support the proposal and join the project.
Read more: WikiProject Council Guide
[It's too long, but it's a start. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 09:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC) ] Shortened as requested. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 15:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
MediaWiki, the software which runs Wikipedia, is hosted by SourceForge.
The right place to support problems with the software ("bugs"), or to request new features, is the SourceForge project site, not Wikipedia. Before you submit a bug report or a feature request, check for duplicates [2], [3]. If you have broader visions for MediaWiki, Meta-Wikipedia is a good place to work on proposals, and the wikitech-l mailing list is
where you can announce and discuss them.
Read more: MediaWiki project homepage
MediaWiki, the software which runs Wikipedia, is hosted by SourceForge.
The right place to report problems with the software ("bugs"), or to request new features, is the SourceForge project site, not Wikipedia. Before you submit a bug report or a feature request, check for duplicates [4], [5]. If you have broader visions for MediaWiki, Meta-Wikipedia is a good place to work on proposals, and the wikitech-l mailing list is
where you can announce and discuss them.
Read more: MediaWiki project homepage
User:AndyZ/peerreviewer is an automated javascript program that highlights areas for improvement for any article on Wikipedia, including sources, lack of categories or tips for uploading images to the page. To use, go to User:AndyZ/peerreviewer and follow the instructions; then, edit any article and click the "peer review" text at the top of the page for an instant automatic peer review!
Anthonycfc [T • C] 17:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Do you merge articles? Are you a translator? Do you dislike using multiple windows to look at multiple pages? If you have a capable web browser, such as Firefox or Safari, you may want to try tabbed browsing within your browser window for quick and easy organization of multiple pages of information. Try using ctrl-T or apple-T to open a new tab, or search your browser's help menu to get started.
HornandsoccerTalk 04:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Wiki formatting often requires the use of the pipe key or "|". Many editors of Wikipedia find it frustrating when they must scroll to the template at the bottom of the page and select the pipe. The pipe key is located on the keyboard itself, directly underneath the backspace key (it looks like "\"). To get "|" simply press the shift key and "\" keys simultaneously.
World (talk • contributions) 21:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
New entries
- Please add new (fresh) tips to the top of this section (the old tips which are being recycled are at the end).
Think forward
While editing, ask yourself "how will this edit make the article grow?". For example, a section titled like "Criticism of this topic" will fill with criticism only, and a section titled like "Trivia of this topic" will fill with trivia rather than specific and organized information. In contrast, usage of inline citations will result in continuing usage of inline citations by future contributors. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Here's a tool that can help when you're using AWB. To help find a category for an article, I choose key main words which are closely connected to the subject. For example, if the article was about a hospital in Poland, I would input into the tool "hospital Poland" (without quotes) and it will then search through categories and list some to choose from. In the example above, Category:Poland and Category:Hospital would be the categories I'd pick. It works really well! Here's the link: Common Sense Tool Good Luck Mlpearc MESSAGE 00:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Mlpearc MESSAGE 18:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
General discussion
Posted tip by Harsh 2580
I posted the following tip, by Harsh 2580 to the June 23 slot. Here it is (with revisions):
Whether you are a new or advanced user, you can edit pages with ease by installing wikEd.
To install, simply select wikEd on the Gadgets panel of your Preferences:
Preferences → Gadgets → Editing → wikEd: a full-featured integrated text editor for Firefox, Safari, and Google Chrome (documentation)
wikEd provides many abilities, including a multifunctional search-and-replace feature for regular expressions (regex).
wikEd works in the following web browsers: Firefox, Pale Moon, SeaMonkey, Safari, WebKit, Google Chrome, and Opera (version 15 and higher). Currently, wikEd is not compatible with Internet Explorer or versions of Opera below 15.
It is also included in the tip lists displayed on January 26, March 1, July 26, and September 1.
The tip replaced the spellchecking tip, which had become obsolete. (Spellchecking is now built-in to most browsers).
Thank you Harsh. The Transhumanist 21:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
2013 revision underway
The main {{totd}} template is displayed at the bottom of the Community portal. Previously, it was integrated into the column formatting of that page, and not nearly as eye-catching. The tip's template formatting complements the new page design.
It's a nice fresh look.
To match this freshness, all stale tips need to be refreshed (revised/updated).
Revising the set entails proofreading every tip to make sure they are relevant and their details accurate and up-to-date. That's 365 tips!
This does not mean they all have to be done at once (but the sooner the better). But each tip slot must be checked and updated before it appears on the Community portal.
So far, I'm up to January 26, and am in the middle of proofreading the tips listed on that list tip.
Feel free to jump in, anywhere in the set. All help is welcome. If you have any questions, please post them below, and we'll work on any problems encountered as a team. Thank you, and have fun! The Transhumanist 19:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- I've been trying to revise tips (including replace obsolete tips) 5 days in advance of their autodisplaying on the Community Portal. But I'm having trouble keeping up the pace. I've slipped behind the display date at least twice. I could sure use some help! I've been converting each tip from the 2008 version to the yearless version (over the redirect), and proofreading/updating the content of each. The Transhumanist 23:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Another way to help
To keep track of tips' accuracy and relevancy, the following 2 templates come in handy. Place either or both of them on your user page or user talk page, so you can keep an eye on tips before the next time their day comes up.
- {{totd-tomorrow}} - this shows tomorrow's tip, and is used for proofreading tips before they go live. If you would like to help monitor tips for accuracy before the rest of the Wikipedia community reads them, please put this on your user page or talk page. Thank you.
- {{totd-random}} - this is the tip of the moment template, which automatically displays a different tip every time you enter a page it is on (to a maximum of one time per minute). If it doesn't update, try clearing your browser cache.
Enjoy, The Transhumanist 19:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Scheduled a tip...
The following tip was submitted by User:OlEnglish and will appear March 2nd:
There is a way to make redirects stand out from a long list of links by visualizing them. This quick and easy solution was found by Kim van der Linde using customized CSS:
Go to "My preferences", click on the tab "Appearance", and click the "Custom CSS" link behind the skin you use. It opens a page, and you can add there the following code (just copy and paste it):
- .mw-redirect {
- color: #006633;
- }
- .mw-redirect:visited {
- color: #009900;
- }
- .mw-redirect:hover {
- color: #990000;
- }
- .mw-redirect:active {
- color: #990000;
- }
Change the color codes if you want. Save the page, and reload (bypass your cache) to force the new CSS to be included. All redirects will now show up as green links!
I tested the tip, and it really works! Now I see redirects wherever they are. This really helps a lot when working on lists and outlines, because you need to be sure a link leads to where it says it links to. The Transhumanist 03:17, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
PS: I changed the title to:
I wonder if anyone actually uses this trick besides its author and me. Drop me a note if you do. The Transhumanist 23:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Tip_of_the_day/May_5 causing error
I explain in detail here:
Upon finding...
"If you see a bad or outdated tip please fix it! Be bold!"
...on this (TotD) project page I went ahead and altered it.
I did so in a manner which preserved the refs by adding {{Reflist}} to the TotD. However, if there are existing refs on a page which displays a template like {{totd}} then I suspect that the list could grow unwieldy.
I'm not sure how widely and in how many contexts the TotD templates are used so I leave it up to someone else to decide whether or not to just go ahead and remove the refs (and reflist) completely.
It would likely produce a cleaner look to do so but I'm allowing consideration for the possibility of a still relevant rationale for having them.
--Kevjonesin (talk) 04:35, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Noticed that my attempt to shrink the displayed ref text was inconsistent. So I went ahead and removed 'em. IMHO, more trouble than they're worth in this context. --Kevjonesin (talk) 04:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Hadger, for How to add hidden editor notes in an article
Dear Hadger,
The tip you wrote has been revised and scheduled to display on May 17.
Thank you! The Transhumanist 01:45, 15 May 2013 (UTC)