Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Video games. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Video games|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Video games. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from August 2015) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Video games-related deletions

Task Force: Ghost Team

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:GNG and it is full of WP:FANCRAFT. The article cites unreliable sources including the COD wiki and GameRant. IDK if this IGN Wiki is consider RS but I don't think so in my opinion but none the less still fails WP:SIGCOV Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not FANDOM, and the article fails WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It doesn't appear that the article title is even the correct name, so not a plausible redirect. ~ A412 ^talk! 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Manifold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if Jack Manifold meets notability guidelines on his own. The refs are mostly about other streamers rather than him and a WP:BEFORE didn't turn up much that's useful. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Internet. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not impressed with the sourcing. This [1] isn't a RS, but devotes much space to the individual. I just don't think this person has hit the mainstream media enough to warrant an article here. Oaktree b (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay of World of Warcraft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the same scope as World of Warcraft, which already covers the gameplay, including its development and reception. This fork re-uses many of the same sources, and writes a worse article that focuses more on material that violates WP:VGSCOPE and WP:GAMEGUIDE. There is a consensus at the Video Games WikiProject that we shouldn't create this type of WP:REDUNDANTFORK, since there is nothing here that isn't covered at World of Warcraft, or the Warcraft franchise article that goes into more detail about the characters and setting. I would consider a redirect, but I don't see material that would be suitable for a merge. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to World of Warcraft. Per my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gameplay of Dragon Quest: I don't think articles like these are needed, independently notable or not, period. WP:MERGEREASON, WP:GAMECRUFT and WP:GAMEGUIDE. λ NegativeMP1 21:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect. IIRC, WoW's gameplay was evolutionary, not revolutionary, for the MMO genre and the gameplay does not rise to the level of notability independent from the game itself. I see the vast majority of topics covered in the gameplay article already covered well in the main article and what remains is/can be covered in individual expansion articles as needed. Axem Titanium (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to World of Warcraft#Gameplay. I don't think a "Gameplay of X" article is a viable concept, sourcing or not, for a similar reason to why a "plot of X" article for a book or movie wouldn't work. It simply does not work as a separate concept. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/delete I don't think there's a problem with some "Gameplay of X" articles but if they are made, they require far more sourcing from reliable, secondary sources. This article is predominately weighed by primary sources from Blizzard themselves, so does not readily show that the gameplay of WoW is independently notable from the game itself. --Masem (t) 06:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with World of Warcraft per WP:NOTGUIDE Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Trading Figure Game

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject is very non-notable. It was a very short lived product with very little actual information covering it. There are two 2007 press releases from NWR and ANN, as well as one interview from IGN, but there are no actual reviews or commentary of this subject, nor is there any indication this game made an impact beyond existing. There's some trivial mentions in coverage of Pokémon Duel mentioning how they had similar gameplay, but notability of the TFG is not inherited from Duel, since Duel is a notable subject while the TFG is only trivially mentioned. Books and Scholar yield nothing bar mentions of the game's release. Admittedly unsure on an AtD, since this isn't a video game and thus not listed at that article bar being mentioned in Duel's summary, and it's not included anywhere else that isn't just a trivial mention of its existence. Unopposed to a redirect, but I'm not sure if a valid target exists for this anywhere. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 15:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Games, Toys, and Japan. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 15:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'd consider the NWR source non-PR coverage. ~ A412 ^talk! 00:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge relevant content to Pokémon Duel. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 12:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you confirm if you did a WP:BEFORE search in Japanese? I have not gone through the results at this stage but seems to be quite a few mentions when you search for ポケモントレーディングフィギュアゲーム. As usual, my !vote is keep for any article where there is no evidence of a search for native language sources by someone who understands it. DCsansei (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DCsansei I did a search utilizing all reliable sources I am aware of in Japanese, as well as a general JP search, and all coverage of the TFG I could find is on Pokémon Duel and how the TFG was a precursor to Duel. All sources from reliable sources I could find were also PRIMARY sources that were interviews with the devs of Duel, and nothing else. I even did a search from around the time periods when the TFG was actively being released, and turned up quite literally nothing. A JP Scholar source yielded nothing, and Books yielded only hits of trading figures or Pokémon individually of one another, with no mention of the TFG specifically. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Buff Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Partnership announcements and clear reprints of press releases do not notability make. ~ A412 ^talk! 07:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Israel. ~ A412 ^talk! 07:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WP:BEFORE didn't uncover enough material to pass WP:NCORP. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Routine announcements and other references seem to fail WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a young company and the article needs work, but the coverage is impressive. gidonb (talk) 00:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
At the risk of sounding snarky, what coverage are you referring to that's not a clear reprint of a company press release? ~ A412 ^talk! 17:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Imakuni?

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very few sources exist actually covering this guy. The article's in a weird spot where he's technically a mascot/fictional character yet also a real person. Coverage on him is sparse regardless. In English there's very little on him in Books, News, and Scholar in the way of SIGCOV, and even in Japanese it's primarily just announcements of collaborations or promotional articles and the like. The current article is primarily subsisting on trivial mentions and primary sources, with little in the way of actual notability. A potential AtD could potentially be a merge to List of Pokémon characters, but I'm admittedly unsure given his unique status. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Fictional elements, and Video games. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Anime and manga, Advertising, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and/or merge to said list. He seems to be extremely niche and GNG-failing, based on the sources present. Heavy case of WP:FANCRUFT. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Piotrus. Fails the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tetr.io

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NGAME, with no independent reviews or coverage besides listacles found on this article or in my WP:BEFORE searches. Previous blank and redirects were reverted. -1ctinus📝🗨 14:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Tetris variants. Besides what's in the article, I also found [2] and [3], but it's just a lot of listicles where nobody has written anything substantial or over two paragraphs about the game. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Tetris variants#Unofficial games (or an anchor, given the list's length) as it was before, where the game's already mentioned. Definitely does not meet WP:NGAME per nom. (As a disclaimer, I created Tetr.io as that redirect before it became an article.) Nyakase (talk • she/her) 16:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Tetris variants. No real SIGCOV here, just listicles. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Listicles can support notability though, they just tend to lack significant coverage as is the case here. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per all. A mention at the target could be a compromise. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Benedikt Johannes Hofer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. None of the sources are reliable (tiiny.site is user-generated), and I found no reliable sources online. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Computing, and Germany. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete: previously deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaming Benni; doesn't this qualify for some speedy deletion criterion? Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 12:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP: GNG, could not find sources to establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 08:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Needs sources that are reliable and independent. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - cross wiki promo spam by globally locked sock farm see file here. Many times placed via the "name game" also on this language version as Benedikt Hofer, Draft:Gaming_Benni, Gaming Benni and Coden mit Benni. This sock even created a fake ai-generated user page with nonsense. Hoyanova (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this sock puppet player is also known in dewiki, see de:Wikipedia:Checkuser/Anfragen/Jurist2109,_DerTischFan1111. --Mary Joanna (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Minecraft spiritual successor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suggest deletion, WP:DRAFTIFY or WP:MERGE under Minecraft, Minecraft (franchise) or Markus Persson as WP:ATD. Basically this is far WP:TOOSOON for a hypothetical game where coverage exists only in respect of some tweets made by Persson that he might make a follow-up. WP:GNG can't apply to something that doesn't exist and hasn't actually been announced and all information is coming from a single primary source. Some secondary sources are reporting on it and speculating what it might mean, but until there are details, this is in substance only information about what Persson is thinking. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge whatever limited information exists for the meantime. This article is basically describing a handful of related events; it's hardly a good foundation for a proper article even when/if this does achieve notability. Anonymous 06:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Markus Persson. This is such an apparent case of WP:TOOSOON that this could be an example listed on the TOOSOON policy page. λ NegativeMP1 07:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Best not to tempt the outcome of discussion, but if there is consensus, perhaps it would be worth placing something like Pre-announcement coverage, such as about a developer revealing work on a game is planned or underway, is not sufficient information to support an article. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I notice there's no VG specific guidance. Maybe that is something to think about. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, allow me to clarify: I was saying that as a hyperbole of how extreme of a TOOSOON case I think this is. I'm not actually proposing the idea of listing this as an example on the page, nor am I making any legitimate predictions regarding this discussions outcome. λ NegativeMP1 09:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! No worries, apologies for misunderstanding. I take things a bit too literally. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL, I don't even see the use of a redirect from such an ambiguous title. At this point it's essentially just a claim without real substance or even a legal basis to make it (or at least refer to it as Minecraft 2). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:32, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Obviously not notable yet. It's a proposal, and sure it is interesting, but only if the proposed game actually becomes a thing. Until further steps are taken, there is no reason it couldn't be summarised on Markus Persson. The fact that the title of this article is so vague and borderline meaningless, says a lot about how early it is. Gust Justice (talk) 09:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment/Question Are there any examples of a standalone article for a merely proposed game/movie/show? Kevinishere15 (talk) 10:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes.

Proposed games: Earthworm Jim 4, Fortress (cancelled video game), Thrill Kill.

Proposed films: Akira (planned film), Easy Come, Easy Go (unfinished film), Grass Roots (film)

Proposed shows: Coming to America (TV pilot), The Prodigy (TV series), Hieroglyph (TV series). Strugglehouse (talk) 12:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unreleased media can be the subject of an article when significant coverage can provide reliable background about what is being discussed. The issue here is that there is no subject; the subject matter, being the idea Persson had to maybe make a Minecraft successor, is by nature only supported by coverage of speculation based on some tweets. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 13:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not the same at all. They accumulated years and years of continued coverage. This was simply a vague poll/social media post made a day or two ago. Sergecross73 msg me 14:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think there's enough coverage at this point to make an individual article worth it. There are many other examples of articles that are just "proposed" ideas. This game will have a lot more coverage as it develops. ~~{{{1}}}~~ Merge to Markus Persson. He doesn't even plan to make the game anymore. Strugglehouse (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"It will have coverage someday" is not an excuse to create an article now. See WP:CRYSTAL. An article based on tweets describing an idea is as WP:TOOSOON as it gets. Delete. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It already has tons of coverage. Strugglehouse (talk) 15:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:MERGEREASON. It violates most points. Sergecross73 msg me 14:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article isn't too short nor does it duplicate another article. There exits lots of coverage already on it, so it's definitely notable. Strugglehouse (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not only is the article short, but it's crazy bloated out with fluff and filler content. Like half of it is just general background for Minecraft or Notch. And a good chunk of it repeats itself with an overly long intro. You could condense the actual meat about the actual subject down to about two sentences. Sergecross73 msg me 16:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (keep redirect, I suppose). Fails WP:TOOSOON, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:LASTING. This game doesn't exist. Not even an in-the-works project. It's entire existence is literally a tweet. There isn't even a hint of WP:GNG. The sources are just sensationalized garbage churnalism at this point. — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 13:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge content to Persson's page. If this was something that had been discussed for many years with various notes on development throughout, then maybe there could be an article, but he just started talking about this yesterday, and only hypothesizing it. Absolutely no need for a standalone at this point. --Masem (t) 13:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per most points at WP:MERGEREASON, and WP:TOOSOON. Sergecross73 msg me 14:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Incredibly WP:CRYSTAL and 'spiritual successor' is an uncitable value judgement in itself, and the statement that he can make an exact copy of the game is also not cited at all. Nate • (chatter) 21:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per WP:TOOSOON. There's absolutely no proof of development, and the decision for it to be a Minecraft spiritual successor was literally decided by a Twitter poll. RadoGaming7 (talk) 22:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Merge or just re-direct~~.Delete Per everyone else. Especially WP:CRYSTAL. It is not inevitable that this will get more coverage in the future. Knowing Notch's history, there is a very real chance he'll be bored of it by this time next week. ApLundell (talk) 23:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, Looks like exactly that happened. Maybe I do have a crystal ball. Changing my !vote to delete. ApLundell (talk) 20:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Normally I'm in the "don't rush to delete" camp, but this is a clear "don't rush to create" situation. All we know is that, a few days ago, the original creator of Minecraft tweeted that he's been in the mood to work on some games lately and did a Twitter poll in which his followers voted for an option labeled "make minecraft 2 boomer". I can understand why this would generate a lot of hype, but there's just nothing to write an article about. As for merging/redirecting, I'm leaning towards a weak oppose. "Untitled Minecraft spiritual successor" is a very lengthy and unusual title; it's hard to imagine many people would think to type that. The most I'd merge is just a single sentence mentioning that Persson has expressed interest in creating a game similar to Minecraft with a few sources attached. But the Markus Persson page already has exactly that, so I can't think of anything in this page that needs to be transferred to that page. Vanilla Wizard 💙 01:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Markus Persson as it's the only viable topic; Minecraft in its current form has very little to do with this so let's not give undue weight to it. Departure– (talk) 04:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Markus Persson. Clear example of WP:TOOSOON, wait until there's at least clear signs that development has actually started. Jurta ^talk/_he/they 06:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Notch just announced he's not making it after all, further reason to reduce this to a mere mention on Notch's page. Jurta ^talk/_he/they 18:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as per above, Too Soon. Sharrdx (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 18:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above, a bit too soon for this. Minikiwigeek2 (talk) 23:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Notch has just abandoned the idea of developing a spiritual successor to Minecraft. Instead, he and his team (Bitshift Entertainment) will continue to develop Levers and Chests, the roguelike game they have been working on since early 2024. Max1298 (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This makes it even more of a textbook example of why we have things like WP:TOOSOON. Sergecross73 msg me 16:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Saying what he did on a Saturday and coming online Monday morning to a detailed email from MS legal? I didn't see that coming (sarcastically said). Nate • (chatter) 22:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge as compromise. The developer's comments can be covered at an article about them. Comments aren't a game. There isn't WP:SIGCOV for a game and this doesn't pass WP:CRYSTAL. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the announcement that the game isn't happening. A brief idea of doing something isn't equivalent to notability. Unopposed to it being added as a footnote to his bio but that's about it. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 17:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, delete as last case scenario. This could be just be on Markus Persson's page Flushedwtf (talk) 09:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Double Fine Comics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of webcomics. The ancient last AfD had one keep vote for lack of rationale. There are two separate articles on minigames, My Game About Me: Olympic Challenge and Tasha's Game. I don't believe the The International House of Mojo is an independent source here. IgelRM (talk) 00:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Webcomics. IgelRM (talk) 00:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Fine Action Comics IgelRM (talk) 00:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to propose merging the small-scale games into this article, but I am exceedingly frustrated at how few of our sources on those actually even mention the source material for them. The Comics Alliance source seems like the most solid one here, but that doesn't carry an article. I got nothing on Double Fine Action Comics in my books either, and sadly I've become incapable of searching the web due to changes to google, so I will have to concur... Merge and Redirect into Double Fine. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 10:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect into Double Fine. Minuscule notability to even afford mentions at should-be source article. MimirIsSmart (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or selective merge to Double Fine. Only found WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs, and not WP:SIGCOV. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Westballz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Top esports player who lacks significant coverage to prove notability. The profiles from Red Bull and ESPN are a good start, but the rest are either web articles of questionable reliability or independence (theScore eSports, EventHubs, G2 Esports) or routine coverage of changes in teams / sponsorships. Bridget (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Video games, and California. Bridget (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - These two ESPN sources [4], [5], the Red Bull source [6], as well as published unauthorized biography [7] probably pushes the subject over the edge in terms of notability. 14:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks Pbrks, were you able to find more info about the book or its author and publisher? The lack of info makes it look a bit suspect, and the blurb isn't too useful. Bridget (talk) 14:40, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes GNG per above, this pretty clearly gets the article over the line.

Noah ^💬 23:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games

Contents

Video games-related deletions

Task Force: Ghost Team

Jack Manifold

Gameplay of World of Warcraft

Pokémon Trading Figure Game

Buff Technologies

Imakuni?

Tetr.io

Benedikt Johannes Hofer

Untitled Minecraft spiritual successor

Double Fine Comics

Westballz

Proposed deletions

Redirects