Wikipedia:Trading card game/Action plan/Phase 2:Cards/Individual card proposals/Rejected
Rejected proposals
editPlace all rejected proposals here, archiving the discussion with it.
- Name of card: main page
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: High Priority page
- Protected: YES *Proposed by: CanvasHat
Extended content
|
---|
Comments Oppose I could imagine this card if the game was about starting a wiki from the ground-up, but the MP is already established here, and I think the game should reflect that. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
|
- Name of card: confirmed
- Class: Userbox
- Text: Act as autoconfirmed
- Required user access level:
USERRegistered - Proposed by: CanvasHat
Extended content
|
---|
Comments We decided against using user rights other than those listed on the user page. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
|
- Name of card:Autopatrolled
- Class: Userbox
- Text:All new articles start as C-class.
- Required user access level: Registered
- Proposed by: CanvasHat
Extended content
|
---|
Comments We decided against using user rights other than those listed on the user page. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
|
MJ
edit- Name of card: Michael Jackson...Woo!
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: Non political.
- Protected: YES
- Proposed by: CanvasHat 00:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Comments Support Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC) Which protection, my good sir? Full, or semi? I support if it is semi. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:14, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Impact Event
edit- Name of card: Impact Event
- Class: Discord
- Text: Everyone loses 50 cJ, discards their entire hand, and draws a new one. All articles are regressed by two stages, and all bots are destroyed.
- Proposed by: VeryPunny
Extended content
|
---|
Comments Impact? You mean like a giant meteorite? Interesting idea. I would think that articles would be destroyed completely, however, not just damaged. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 16:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't care about what you do with articles, but I think that CJs should not be touched; once you have them, you should get to keep them. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
LOL (pronounced 'lɒl) —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 03:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
|
- Name of card: Lolcat
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: I Can Has Cheezburger?
- Protected: no
- Proposed by: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs · count · logs) 29. November 2010
Extended content
|
---|
Comments Has this been featured? Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
|
- Name of card: Glitched archive bot
- Class: Discord/VandalBot
- Text: An archiving bot has begun archiving random pages, +1 vandalism for all pages starting with letters a-d, k-q or u-z.
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 28 November 2010
Extended content
|
---|
Comments Proposed form a comment on #Glitched Bot. I'll think about a link. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 16:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Seems fine. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 21:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
(again)
We might want to put some type of huge chevron at the top of the page... And what would we do if they don't have one? We would probably use this for more randomizations, because otherwise ONLY true collectors would have them. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Several valid points there, some that I never thought of. Thanks! Moving toward opposition of randomosity. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 23:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
|
This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
- Name of card: Marvel Comics
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: N/A - Tribute
- Protected: No
- Proposed by: -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 18:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
{{{1}}}
|
- Name of card: NOT GONNA TYPE THAT AGAIN
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: THIS IS MY TRIBUTE...
- Protected: SEMI
- Proposed by: CanvasHat 00:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Comments
Hey, much better! This card could be an interesting one to illustrate...lol. But it can be done. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC) I would have to agree; there are no problems with this one. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:14, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Except for the fact that there shouldn't be protection. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
sorry, but... well see below.--CanvasHat 01:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn |
This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
- Name of card: Obligatory cheese donation
- Class: Wikipedia (bad)
- Text:
As long as this card is in play, you may not create or improve any articles until you have either improved or created an article relating to cheese.- Your first edit each turn must be applied to a cheese-related article.
- Protected: YES
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 06:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Quote: All users of Wikipedia must make a small donation of 10 Kg of Cheddar Cheese. -- AGK
Extended content
|
---|
Comments
"... until you have either improved or created an article relating to cheese." Meaning the first time one of those happens after the policy is played? I don't like that; it would then be useless at that point. How about "Only articles relating to cheese may be created or improved as long as this card is in play."? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 06:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
We do need card synergies in this game, but (as has been mentioned before) there just aren't enough cheese-related articles out there to support this card. Perhaps we should change it to something else... (actually this gives me an idea for another card, see "BLP improvement drive" below.) Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 20:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Rejected: Good idea, but there are is only one qualifying cheese article. |
This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
- Name of card: Noob
- Class: Article (bad)
- Text: Effect:Every time this creature edits an article, it gets a vandalism message on its talk page.
- Proposed by: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs)
Extended content
|
---|
Comments A few problems...what you've described sounds like a vandal, not an article. Also, we don't have talk pages in the game. Perhaps a better text instruction might read "Vandalizes one article per turn per player. Vandalism requires a player's attention to correct, so it would certainly keep players busy as long as it's in play. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:24, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
(forget all the colons) Well, a noob isnt quite anything else... quote should be: It lives! |
This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
- Name of card: Friend of a gay
- Class: Vandal
- Text: Causes one vandalism on each player's turn.
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 16:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This card would HAVE to include a witty quote that explains the joke... something along the lines of "Insertions like "CHRIS IS A HOMO" make up one of the largest percentages of vandalism. If we fail to include a quote that adequately explains the joke, it'll look discriminatory.
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
Image comments
WIP for review: image —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 08:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Seriously, this card needs a major overhaul. Right now it just comes across as incredibly homophobic, and I fear that no matter how tasteful we try to be, people will get offended. The problem is that the page that this card refers to is incredibly sarcastic, in a way that is nearly impossible to get across in a card. If anything, I think "Wikipedia is not the place to publicly announce a friend's sexual orientation or proclivities." would be a much better quote, and changing the title to "Friend" of gays (with the scare quotes), and using an image that's clearly related to vandalizing Wikipedia, might be enough to salvage the card.
|
CoD:BO
edit- Name of card: Call of Duty: Black Ops
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: Video game article, Cold war article and Vietnam war article. Made by Treyarch. Famous (OPTIONAL)
- Protected: YES
- Proposed by: CanvasHat 01:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC) called it. This is my tribute.
- I've emailed Activision. I'll keep y'all posted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:09, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Activision hasn't responded yet. I'll continue waiting for a response. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've emailed Activision. I'll keep y'all posted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:09, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Activision hasn't responded yet. I'll continue waiting for a response. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: left; clear: left |
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: right; clear: right |
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: none |
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: both |
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn#if:|{{{width}}}|100%}}; clear: both }}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn#if:|left|{{===Comments==== Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn#if:|center|left}}}}; {{===Comments==== Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Request withdrawn#if:|color: {{{fc}}};|}}" |Extended content
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
Provided we get permission from the publishers (which they might actually say yes just because it's good product placement). They might require we pay them a certain amount for each card printed with the title on it, but if it is low enough that the card can be printed and still make profit, it sounds great. That reminds me of something... I'll post it shortly on the talk page. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've emailed Activision. I'll keep y'all posted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:09, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Activision hasn't responded yet. I'll continue waiting for a response. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
On hold until we hear back from Activision
I have an idea for another one...it's noot copyrighted...and it might work. I'm guessing that Activision simply left it...and to be completely I don't have high hopes for this one--CanvasHat 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Here--CanvasHat 00:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
Willy on Wheels (2)
edit- Name of card: Willy on Wheels
- Class: Vandal (bad)
- Text: When in play, this causes 3 vandalisms at the beginning of any admins', Jimbo or bureaucrats' turn.
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 23 November 2010
Extended content
|
---|
Comments from the card's original proposal
|
Wild card
edit- Name of card: Wild
- Class: Special
- Text: This card can be used as any card, good or bad, for or against any player (but it cannot break rules.)
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 28 November 2010
Comments from the card's original proposal
|
---|
CommentsI am totally opposed to wild cards, for the simple reason that in a TCG, I doubt anyone will be able to know what all fo the cards are (unless you are us, and you are designing them). This would make it unfair, because someone may know about a card that othes do not, and they would be able to use it when the other people would not. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
|
- Name of card: Lolcat
- Class: Article (bad)
- Text: Ceiling Cat is watching you [sample]
- Protected: no
- Proposed by: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs · count · logs) 29. November 2010
Comments
editExtended content
|
---|
Oh, I change my mind. This one might not work, being a section of Lolcat, the card above. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
|
- Name of card: SpongeBob SquarePants
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: (tribute card)
- Protected: Autoconfirmed only (as in real life)
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 28 November 2010
- Added to the list. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Lol-- so long as we get permission from the producers, support. This is a money-making device, so we can't consider it fair use. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- What if we give copyrighted cards away free with every pack? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Um....that's a good question. I actually was thinking a couple weeks ago about opening up a product placement corner with this where companies would pay some amount to have their name and logo put on a card, and in doing so, they'd have to sign a contract allowing us to sell the said card. But this opens up a completely different avenue, if it's an option. A couple years ago I found a website where you can get free legal advice. I'll see if I can get an answer to your question, Nicky. I like the idea. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked the question here, if anyone wants to see the answer before I return. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like the answer is that even if we include the cards as free bonus cards, we'll still need explicit permission to use both the image and the trademark. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 16:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I like your idea of having companies pay to have something on a card. However, we must remember to not let anyone on; it needs to be an FA article, regardless of how much they pay (unless it is ≥five digits long to the left of the decimal point...). :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- If we do that route, Hi, it would be appropriate not to nominate companies and trademarks ourselves, even as tribute articles. Rather, we would send out an email to all eligible parties explaining the opportunity to sponsor us and have their trademark or organization placed on a card. Thereby, going that route would nullify Nicky's and Canvas's proposals (they'd just need to choose something else instead), as well as the Homer Simpson proposal. If that's okay with both Nicky and Canvas, I'm fine with it. Also, I've done a little research-- Viacom is the company to contact regarding SpongeBob. But let's decide whether to implement the voluntary sponsor strategy before contacting Viacom, as one outcome will affect whether SpongeBob would even qualify for a card. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- I think that we should do that, and I am fine with having Canvas and Nicky picking different articles, as long as they are. More money for the WMF is a good thing, I believe. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 04:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Lol, you are drawn to copyrighted and trademarked things... it's cracking me up over here! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Nicky, you might want to take a closer look through the little conversation that we have been having. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry about that, it's just that my idolatry hierarchy revolves around cartoons. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia)
- I meant the conversation about using copyrighted things; as soon as we finish talking about how we should not use copyrighted things for our tribute cards, you suggest using Google for yours. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Give me a week, I'll think of something. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 21:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
- And with that, we can discuss on the talk page how we want to handle our featured sponsor opportunity. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia||display: none;}}background-color: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; {{===Comments====
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Added to the list. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Lol-- so long as we get permission from the producers, support. This is a money-making device, so we can't consider it fair use. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- What if we give copyrighted cards away free with every pack? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Um....that's a good question. I actually was thinking a couple weeks ago about opening up a product placement corner with this where companies would pay some amount to have their name and logo put on a card, and in doing so, they'd have to sign a contract allowing us to sell the said card. But this opens up a completely different avenue, if it's an option. A couple years ago I found a website where you can get free legal advice. I'll see if I can get an answer to your question, Nicky. I like the idea. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked the question here, if anyone wants to see the answer before I return. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like the answer is that even if we include the cards as free bonus cards, we'll still need explicit permission to use both the image and the trademark. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 16:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I like your idea of having companies pay to have something on a card. However, we must remember to not let anyone on; it needs to be an FA article, regardless of how much they pay (unless it is ≥five digits long to the left of the decimal point...). :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- If we do that route, Hi, it would be appropriate not to nominate companies and trademarks ourselves, even as tribute articles. Rather, we would send out an email to all eligible parties explaining the opportunity to sponsor us and have their trademark or organization placed on a card. Thereby, going that route would nullify Nicky's and Canvas's proposals (they'd just need to choose something else instead), as well as the Homer Simpson proposal. If that's okay with both Nicky and Canvas, I'm fine with it. Also, I've done a little research-- Viacom is the company to contact regarding SpongeBob. But let's decide whether to implement the voluntary sponsor strategy before contacting Viacom, as one outcome will affect whether SpongeBob would even qualify for a card. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- I think that we should do that, and I am fine with having Canvas and Nicky picking different articles, as long as they are. More money for the WMF is a good thing, I believe. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 04:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Lol, you are drawn to copyrighted and trademarked things... it's cracking me up over here! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Nicky, you might want to take a closer look through the little conversation that we have been having. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry about that, it's just that my idolatry hierarchy revolves around cartoons. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia)
- I meant the conversation about using copyrighted things; as soon as we finish talking about how we should not use copyrighted things for our tribute cards, you suggest using Google for yours. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Give me a week, I'll think of something. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 21:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
- And with that, we can discuss on the talk page how we want to handle our featured sponsor opportunity. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)#switch:
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
|
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
|
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
|
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
|
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
}}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
This is my tribute card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Added to the list. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Lol-- so long as we get permission from the producers, support. This is a money-making device, so we can't consider it fair use. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- What if we give copyrighted cards away free with every pack? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Um....that's a good question. I actually was thinking a couple weeks ago about opening up a product placement corner with this where companies would pay some amount to have their name and logo put on a card, and in doing so, they'd have to sign a contract allowing us to sell the said card. But this opens up a completely different avenue, if it's an option. A couple years ago I found a website where you can get free legal advice. I'll see if I can get an answer to your question, Nicky. I like the idea. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked the question here, if anyone wants to see the answer before I return. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like the answer is that even if we include the cards as free bonus cards, we'll still need explicit permission to use both the image and the trademark. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 16:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I like your idea of having companies pay to have something on a card. However, we must remember to not let anyone on; it needs to be an FA article, regardless of how much they pay (unless it is ≥five digits long to the left of the decimal point...). :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- If we do that route, Hi, it would be appropriate not to nominate companies and trademarks ourselves, even as tribute articles. Rather, we would send out an email to all eligible parties explaining the opportunity to sponsor us and have their trademark or organization placed on a card. Thereby, going that route would nullify Nicky's and Canvas's proposals (they'd just need to choose something else instead), as well as the Homer Simpson proposal. If that's okay with both Nicky and Canvas, I'm fine with it. Also, I've done a little research-- Viacom is the company to contact regarding SpongeBob. But let's decide whether to implement the voluntary sponsor strategy before contacting Viacom, as one outcome will affect whether SpongeBob would even qualify for a card. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- I think that we should do that, and I am fine with having Canvas and Nicky picking different articles, as long as they are. More money for the WMF is a good thing, I believe. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 04:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm happy to change; I said on Mars :) that I'd prefer SpongeBob but am fine with Google or one of several other things. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Lol, you are drawn to copyrighted and trademarked things... it's cracking me up over here! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Nicky, you might want to take a closer look through the little conversation that we have been having. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry about that, it's just that my idolatry hierarchy revolves around cartoons. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia)
- I meant the conversation about using copyrighted things; as soon as we finish talking about how we should not use copyrighted things for our tribute cards, you suggest using Google for yours. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Give me a week, I'll think of something. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 21:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Request withdrawn
- And with that, we can discuss on the talk page how we want to handle our featured sponsor opportunity. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
- Name of card: Simpson
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: D'oh!
- Protected: no
- Proposed by: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs · count · logs) 29. November 2010
- Keep in mind we've got copyright permissions to work around here...I'll support it so long as we get expressed written permission from the producers. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Shall we email one of them? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- That'd be the first method we can try. We need permission from whoever holds the copyright on the Simpsons franchise. Make sure you make it explicitly clear that we are looking for permission to print a marketable trading card featuring the character for a game whose profits will be donated to the Wikimedia Foundation. Keep track of who all you talk to; we need to archive any permissions we receive. In fact, copy me at bobthewikipedian at gmail dot com when you email them; it'll make archival of permissions easy if they stay centralized. If they don't respond to an email, we'll have to call them or write them a letter. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I guess I'll try to make contact. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I use gmail so I saved this as a draft:
- To terms@fox.com:
- Dear Fox,
- I apologize for contacting you at this address, no "contact us" information or form seemed to be available on the fox web sites and this seemed the most applicable email address. I am working with the Wikipedia Trading Card Game committee and would like to create a card in honor of your show, the Simpsons. These cards are to be sold and the money given to the Wikimedia Foundation. We respectfully request explicit permission to use logos, images or other possible copyrighted materials relating to the Simpsons as a show to be printed on these cards for a commercial purpose.
- Many thanks to whoever reads this,
- [name withheld]
- Please tell me if it's alright. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I use gmail so I saved this as a draft:
- Looks good to me. Not sure if it helps, but here's a copy of one I sent to Activision. It hasn't generated any response; not sure if they discarded the email as a joke or refused to answer, or whether it's really taking this long to respond, so not following my example might actually be a good idea:
Hello,
I am part of a team working on developing a trading card game based on Wikipedia to serve as a fundraising product for Wikimedia. We are considering including a trading card that features either a logo or screenshot from the video game Call of Duty: Black Ops. The inclusion of this trading card in the game would serve as excellent product placement with a projected audience being a small percentage of Wikipedia's countless editors.
Before we can include this card in the game, however, we would like to obtain permission to print this content on our cards. All profits beyond the cost of producing the game would be donated to Wikimedia Foundation.
Thank you,
<<<<<NAME WITHHELD>>>>>
Wikipedia Department of Fun
Declined#ifeq:Wikipedia||display: none;}}background-color: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; {{===Comments==== All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep in mind we've got copyright permissions to work around here...I'll support it so long as we get expressed written permission from the producers. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Shall we email one of them? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- That'd be the first method we can try. We need permission from whoever holds the copyright on the Simpsons franchise. Make sure you make it explicitly clear that we are looking for permission to print a marketable trading card featuring the character for a game whose profits will be donated to the Wikimedia Foundation. Keep track of who all you talk to; we need to archive any permissions we receive. In fact, copy me at bobthewikipedian at gmail dot com when you email them; it'll make archival of permissions easy if they stay centralized. If they don't respond to an email, we'll have to call them or write them a letter. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I guess I'll try to make contact. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I use gmail so I saved this as a draft:
- To terms@fox.com:
- Dear Fox,
- I apologize for contacting you at this address, no "contact us" information or form seemed to be available on the fox web sites and this seemed the most applicable email address. I am working with the Wikipedia Trading Card Game committee and would like to create a card in honor of your show, the Simpsons. These cards are to be sold and the money given to the Wikimedia Foundation. We respectfully request explicit permission to use logos, images or other possible copyrighted materials relating to the Simpsons as a show to be printed on these cards for a commercial purpose.
- Many thanks to whoever reads this,
- [name withheld]
- Please tell me if it's alright. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I use gmail so I saved this as a draft:
- Looks good to me. Not sure if it helps, but here's a copy of one I sent to Activision. It hasn't generated any response; not sure if they discarded the email as a joke or refused to answer, or whether it's really taking this long to respond, so not following my example might actually be a good idea:
Hello,
I am part of a team working on developing a trading card game based on Wikipedia to serve as a fundraising product for Wikimedia. We are considering including a trading card that features either a logo or screenshot from the video game Call of Duty: Black Ops. The inclusion of this trading card in the game would serve as excellent product placement with a projected audience being a small percentage of Wikipedia's countless editors.
Before we can include this card in the game, however, we would like to obtain permission to print this content on our cards. All profits beyond the cost of producing the game would be donated to Wikimedia Foundation.
Thank you,
<<<<<NAME WITHHELD>>>>>
Wikipedia Department of Fun
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
|
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
|
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
|
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
|
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Declined#if:|{{{width}}}|100%}}; clear: both }}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Declined#if:|left|{{===Comments==== All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Declined#if:|center|left}}}}; {{===Comments==== All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Declined#if:|color: {{{fc}}};|}}" | Extended content
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
All three are perfectly fine to me. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 22:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep in mind we've got copyright permissions to work around here...I'll support it so long as we get expressed written permission from the producers. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Shall we email one of them? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- That'd be the first method we can try. We need permission from whoever holds the copyright on the Simpsons franchise. Make sure you make it explicitly clear that we are looking for permission to print a marketable trading card featuring the character for a game whose profits will be donated to the Wikimedia Foundation. Keep track of who all you talk to; we need to archive any permissions we receive. In fact, copy me at bobthewikipedian at gmail dot com when you email them; it'll make archival of permissions easy if they stay centralized. If they don't respond to an email, we'll have to call them or write them a letter. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I guess I'll try to make contact. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I use gmail so I saved this as a draft:
- To terms@fox.com:
- Dear Fox,
- I apologize for contacting you at this address, no "contact us" information or form seemed to be available on the fox web sites and this seemed the most applicable email address. I am working with the Wikipedia Trading Card Game committee and would like to create a card in honor of your show, the Simpsons. These cards are to be sold and the money given to the Wikimedia Foundation. We respectfully request explicit permission to use logos, images or other possible copyrighted materials relating to the Simpsons as a show to be printed on these cards for a commercial purpose.
- Many thanks to whoever reads this,
- [name withheld]
- Please tell me if it's alright. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 13:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I use gmail so I saved this as a draft:
- Looks good to me. Not sure if it helps, but here's a copy of one I sent to Activision. It hasn't generated any response; not sure if they discarded the email as a joke or refused to answer, or whether it's really taking this long to respond, so not following my example might actually be a good idea:
Hello,
I am part of a team working on developing a trading card game based on Wikipedia to serve as a fundraising product for Wikimedia. We are considering including a trading card that features either a logo or screenshot from the video game Call of Duty: Black Ops. The inclusion of this trading card in the game would serve as excellent product placement with a projected audience being a small percentage of Wikipedia's countless editors.
Before we can include this card in the game, however, we would like to obtain permission to print this content on our cards. All profits beyond the cost of producing the game would be donated to Wikimedia Foundation.
Thank you,
<<<<<NAME WITHHELD>>>>>
Wikipedia Department of Fun
- Name of card: The Game
- Class: Discord
- Text: You've just lost a game called The Game. Lose your turn.
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 30 November 2010
- Not to spoil the fun, but I just realized this card has virtually nothing to do with life on Wikipedia. :( Drat, I was excited about this one. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- True. You have convinced me that this is a bad card to use. :P I oppose it. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It might not.... By the way, didn't anyone ever tell you not to stick your tongue out at people? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh! Oh! Oh! Answer! Let's turn it into an article! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It is a start-class article, my dear sir. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- . *facepalm* You're right. Forget that idea. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Down the John with ye card! —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 07:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia||display: none;}}background-color: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; {{===Comments====
- Not to spoil the fun, but I just realized this card has virtually nothing to do with life on Wikipedia. :( Drat, I was excited about this one. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- True. You have convinced me that this is a bad card to use. :P I oppose it. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It might not.... By the way, didn't anyone ever tell you not to stick your tongue out at people? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh! Oh! Oh! Answer! Let's turn it into an article! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It is a start-class article, my dear sir. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- . *facepalm* You're right. Forget that idea. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Down the John with ye card! —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 07:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)#switch:
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
|
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
|
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
|
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
|
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
}}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
Seems great. By the way, all of you brilliant people linked to the disambig page each time that you mentioned this. :P ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not to spoil the fun, but I just realized this card has virtually nothing to do with life on Wikipedia. :( Drat, I was excited about this one. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- True. You have convinced me that this is a bad card to use. :P I oppose it. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It might not.... By the way, didn't anyone ever tell you not to stick your tongue out at people? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh! Oh! Oh! Answer! Let's turn it into an article! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It is a start-class article, my dear sir. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- . *facepalm* You're right. Forget that idea. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Down the John with ye card! —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 07:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
- Name of card: Revert
- Class: Edit
- Text: Revert one vandalism.
- User access level: Anonymous
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 1 December 2010
- Eh....I was gonna say yeah, but actually, yes, pointless. This card could be used as a sacrificial card for the exact same purpose. It'd be better to come up with some other anonymous-level edit; that way the card has an added function. (Also-- anon-level edits are required in order for an anon to sacrifice them, so keep in mind that we need to have lots of anon-level edit cards). Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Before I add this to the rejected cards page, I'd like to point this out: if it can't do anything else, you won't feel any guilt about wasting a card or not doing something you could have otherwise done. It's kind of a "filler edit" to force you to use it for this specific purpose. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 08:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ooooo...when you put it that way...you've convinced me. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It seems like a waste of a card; I'm sure that many people will think "Why did they make a card that does what can be done with any card? Those people are idiotic." That is definitely what I would be thinking. People could also think something along the lines of "What? That's what all of the cards do... Am I missing something? Did I misread the rules? I AM SO CONFUSED!!!!" Either one of those would be undesirable, I would think. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- The text could always be changed to something like This card is to be used specifically to revert one vandalism, it's a sacrificial card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 03:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hi's got a good point-- it'd be confusing to stick a card like that in a starter set, and pointless to put in a foil pack, as no one in his right mind would add it to his deck. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia||display: none;}}background-color: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; {{===Comments====
- Eh....I was gonna say yeah, but actually, yes, pointless. This card could be used as a sacrificial card for the exact same purpose. It'd be better to come up with some other anonymous-level edit; that way the card has an added function. (Also-- anon-level edits are required in order for an anon to sacrifice them, so keep in mind that we need to have lots of anon-level edit cards). Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Before I add this to the rejected cards page, I'd like to point this out: if it can't do anything else, you won't feel any guilt about wasting a card or not doing something you could have otherwise done. It's kind of a "filler edit" to force you to use it for this specific purpose. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 08:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ooooo...when you put it that way...you've convinced me. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It seems like a waste of a card; I'm sure that many people will think "Why did they make a card that does what can be done with any card? Those people are idiotic." That is definitely what I would be thinking. People could also think something along the lines of "What? That's what all of the cards do... Am I missing something? Did I misread the rules? I AM SO CONFUSED!!!!" Either one of those would be undesirable, I would think. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- The text could always be changed to something like This card is to be used specifically to revert one vandalism, it's a sacrificial card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 03:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hi's got a good point-- it'd be confusing to stick a card like that in a starter set, and pointless to put in a foil pack, as no one in his right mind would add it to his deck. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)#switch:
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
|
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
|
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
|
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
|
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
}}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
You can always choose to sacrifice an edit card to undo a vandalism, but this kind of forces you. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Pointless. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Eh....I was gonna say yeah, but actually, yes, pointless. This card could be used as a sacrificial card for the exact same purpose. It'd be better to come up with some other anonymous-level edit; that way the card has an added function. (Also-- anon-level edits are required in order for an anon to sacrifice them, so keep in mind that we need to have lots of anon-level edit cards). Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Before I add this to the rejected cards page, I'd like to point this out: if it can't do anything else, you won't feel any guilt about wasting a card or not doing something you could have otherwise done. It's kind of a "filler edit" to force you to use it for this specific purpose. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 08:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ooooo...when you put it that way...you've convinced me. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 18:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- It seems like a waste of a card; I'm sure that many people will think "Why did they make a card that does what can be done with any card? Those people are idiotic." That is definitely what I would be thinking. People could also think something along the lines of "What? That's what all of the cards do... Am I missing something? Did I misread the rules? I AM SO CONFUSED!!!!" Either one of those would be undesirable, I would think. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- The text could always be changed to something like This card is to be used specifically to revert one vandalism, it's a sacrificial card. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 03:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hi's got a good point-- it'd be confusing to stick a card like that in a starter set, and pointless to put in a foil pack, as no one in his right mind would add it to his deck. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
Captain Jack Sparrow
edit- Name of card: REPLACE WITH NAME OF CARD
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: Fictional Character
- Protected: YES OR NO
- Proposed by: CanvasHat 00:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: left; clear: left |
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: right; clear: right |
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: none |
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: both |
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|100%}}; clear: both }}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|left|{{===Comments==== copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|center|left}}}}; {{===Comments==== copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|color: {{{fc}}};|}}" |Extended content
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
copyrighted Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
- Name of card: Mars
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: Red Planet
- Protected: semi
- Proposed by: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs · count)
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: left; clear: left |
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: right; clear: right |
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: none |
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: both |
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|100%}}; clear: both }}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|left|{{===Comments==== Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|center|left}}}}; {{===Comments==== Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|color: {{{fc}}};|}}" |Extended content
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
Redundant. The card's already been approved. It's awaiting a quote in the section above. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
- Name of card: New Super Mario Bros.
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: First platform game from the mario series playable on nds
- Protected: no
- Proposed by: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs · count)
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: left; clear: left |
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: right; clear: right |
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: none |
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: both |
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|100%}}; clear: both }}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|left|{{===Comments==== Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|center|left}}}}; {{===Comments==== Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|color: {{{fc}}};|}}" |Extended content
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
- Name of card: The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: Fifth game from the zelda series.
- Protected: no
- Proposed by: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs · count)
- The GOP is entitled now Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Haven't you heard? We're all Republicans now! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- The GOP is entitled now Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Haven't you heard? We're all Republicans now! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: left; clear: left |
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: right; clear: right |
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: none |
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: both |
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|100%}}; clear: both }}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|left|{{===Comments==== Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|center|left}}}}; {{===Comments==== Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
Why aren't you entitled to a tribute? You should be...--CanvasHat 21:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- The GOP is entitled now Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
??Republicans??Wwhat about democrats,and most importantly what about Pumpkin??--CanvasHat 03:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Haven't you heard? We're all Republicans now! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
- Name of card: Mickey Mouse
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: N/A - Tribute
- Protected: semi
- Proposed by: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs · count)
- I'm pretty sure this one's copyrighted too. Or something.Bananaclasic (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure this one's copyrighted too. Or something.Bananaclasic (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted Yup, he barely made the copyright cutoff by like a couple years. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: left; clear: left |
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted Yup, he barely made the copyright cutoff by like a couple years. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: right; clear: right |
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted Yup, he barely made the copyright cutoff by like a couple years. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: none |
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted Yup, he barely made the copyright cutoff by like a couple years. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: both |
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
Copyrighted Yup, he barely made the copyright cutoff by like a couple years. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|100%}}; clear: both }}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
Copyrighted Yup, he barely made the copyright cutoff by like a couple years. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|left|{{===Comments====
Copyrighted Yup, he barely made the copyright cutoff by like a couple years. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|center|left}}}}; {{===Comments====
Extended content
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
- I'm pretty sure this one's copyrighted too. Or something.Bananaclasic (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted Yup, he barely made the copyright cutoff by like a couple years. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
- Name of card: Drinking water
- Class: Article (good)
- Text: N/A - Tribute
- Protected: No
- Proposed by: -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 18:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- My favourite beverage.
- If I were you, I would pick this one. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- So this isn't my tribute card.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well then... Below GA rating. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- My favourite beverage.
- If I were you, I would pick this one. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- So this isn't my tribute card.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well then... Below GA rating. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
left = margin:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually...the appropriate cutoff would be Never featured. Whoops, I'm on WikiBreak. Back to my homework... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: left; clear: left |
right = margin:0.2em 0 0.2em 0.5em; width:{{===Comments====
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually...the appropriate cutoff would be Never featured. Whoops, I'm on WikiBreak. Back to my homework... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; float: right; clear: right |
none = margin:0.2em 0; width:{{===Comments====
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually...the appropriate cutoff would be Never featured. Whoops, I'm on WikiBreak. Back to my homework... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: none |
centre = margin:0.2em auto; width:{{===Comments====
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually...the appropriate cutoff would be Never featured. Whoops, I'm on WikiBreak. Back to my homework... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|auto}}; clear: both |
#default = margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:{{===Comments====
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually...the appropriate cutoff would be Never featured. Whoops, I'm on WikiBreak. Back to my homework... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|{{{width}}}|100%}}; clear: both }}; padding: 1px;" |
style="background-color: #F0F2F5; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align: {{===Comments====
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually...the appropriate cutoff would be Never featured. Whoops, I'm on WikiBreak. Back to my homework... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|left|{{===Comments====
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually...the appropriate cutoff would be Never featured. Whoops, I'm on WikiBreak. Back to my homework... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)#if:|center|left}}}}; {{===Comments====
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{{1}}}
|
{{===Comments====
- My favourite beverage.
You only get one tribute card, my dear sir. Pick one of the three. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- If I were you, I would pick this one. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- So this isn't my tribute card.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well then... Below GA rating. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually...the appropriate cutoff would be Never featured. Whoops, I'm on WikiBreak. Back to my homework... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)#ifeq:Wikipedia|| }}
Practical Joke
edit- Name of card: Practical Joke
- Class: Vandalism
- Text:Show your hand to your opponent, who will choose an edit or instant card and discard it. Oh yeah, and you just lost the Game!
- Proposed by: CanvasHat 13:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Quote suggestions
Extended content
|
---|
' "Practicl jokes are suppost 2 happen on Wikipedia." —an obvyisly real WP policy ' —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I am going to decline this card this weekend if nobody can come up with a quote and link. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Heh heh. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 15:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
And the title's a fake link! That's great! —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 15:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
If someone hasn't already, I'll propose it. (I'm reading down the page this time.) —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 12:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC) |
Cards suggested before the rules were written
editNote that these may be partly salvageable. Feel free to pull ideas from them.
cannot click for Actions
Founder
editSteward, Bureaucrat There may only be one Founder in play. Click ~ to delete an Editor
You may click ~ to prevent an opponent from deleting a rival's contribution
Broken Link Edit
edit(-200) Any rival beside you may click an Editor to negate this Edit
(-500) You cannot play Actions after you play ~
Click an Editor Click one of a rival's Editors
Featured Article Edit
edit(+500) All rivals beside you add 500 to their Contribution
Off-Wiki Plot Action
editClick two Editors Divide your Contribution into two equal parts (edits-wise). Then, trade each half for half the Contributions of the rivals beside you
Oversighter Editor
editAdministrator Click ~ to remove a card in a Deletion Pile from the game
(-100) You can only use ~ on yourself. You gain half the contributions earned from the next player's turn, to a maximum of 50 edits
Wheel-Warring Action
editDelete one of your Administrators Rivals beside you cannot click Administrators on their next turns
Administrative Rampage Action
editAdministrator Delete all Editors, Founder and Bureaucrat are unaffected
When ~ comes into play, each rival puts an Editor named "~" into play
Nullifies wheel-warring, editwarring and canvassing
Miss a turn.
?
?
RfB Troller
editPrevent an editor from becoming a bureaucrat. but lose a wikisphere, or whatever those wiki logo things are called
Administrator Block all innocent users.
You can place faced down card on field
Rollbacker May revert vandalism three times per turn.
You are immune to vandalism until your next turn.
?
One of your editors may perform two actions this turn instead of one.
Administrator ?
Move all the following back to deck and draw 5 cards.
Untraceable
edit(-35) Nullifies the next bot to be played.
You are blocked for one turn, but can negate one editor card next turn
Administrator Temporarily de-sysop up to two administrators. Treat affected administrators as regular editors for one full round.
If a vandal has deleted/blanked/vandalized a stub or article by a new user, delete that vandal.
Can copy any effect on positive card
One use per card. Allows a user to copyright any card they're holding for 3 turns. If the opposing user then uses the same card within 3 turns, then that opposing user's card is void. After 3 turns, the opposing user's card is no longer void, unless Fair Use is renewed.
Make a user an admin.
Inspiration
editadmin Make a new user
Second Chance
editAdmin Make a banned vandal a user.
Controversy
editvandal remove any merits an article has
Omit
editDelete one of your opponents articles.
Practical Joke
editNegate the effects of an opponent's click on an editor.
Risk
edituser Give up a user for a random card from your opponent's hand.
Make all of your articles featured.
Media Class Project
editAll players with an editor card in play may play one edit card without clicking an editor.
first edit
edituser add a user to a project
Administrator
editBot (anti-vandalism)
editBot (content-generating)
editBot-op
editBeaurocrat
editCheckuser
editDeveloper
editRogue User
editRollbacker
editSockpuppet
editSteward
editVandal
editUser
editWikiDragon
editWikiFairy
editWikiOgre
editHotel Wikipedia
editJimbo
editDrama Monger
edit- ^ Koshland Jr, Daniel E. (March 22, 2002). "The Seven Pillars of Life". Science. 295 (5563): 2215–2216. doi:10.1126/science.1068489. PMID 11910092. Retrieved 2009-05-25.
- ^ The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edition, published by Houghton Mifflin Company, via Answers.com:
- "The property or quality that distinguishes living organisms from dead organisms and inanimate matter, manifested in functions such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli or adaptation to the environment originating from within the organism."
- "The characteristic state or condition of a living organism."
- ^ Definition of inanimate. WordNet Search by Princeton University.