Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 18

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template has just three transclusions, all in article space. It appears to be intended to link to Wikipedia space for an explanation, but instead, it links to the template page. I suggest replacing these transclusions with a more widely accepted inline maintenance template, but I don't know which one would be best. Ideas are welcome. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kind of looks like {{citation needed}} by another name. Izno (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless, if a template is going to be replaced, then it's still deleting it or implying deletion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Replace with {{Citation needed}} and delete (no redirect). Gonnym (talk) 20:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content. A simple set of images. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2020. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Infobox settlement}}. Used in just one editor's page. Userfy, or replace with Infobox settlement and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions to explain why it was created. No template parameters. Just one usage which should be substed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Given the continued interest by the author in perhaps someday maybe using the template, I have userfied this. Izno (talk) 22:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, except in the 2019 discussion that proposed it. It was, in the end, rejected there. The discussion meandered and talked about conversions and all sorts of options, but the final code in this template is trivial:
{{{1}}} <small>([[{{{altlink|Old Style and New Style dates}}}|{{{alt|O.S.}}}]]: {{{2}}})</small>

This template can safely be substed into the discussion and deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 25. Izno (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All of these templates are no longer used as they have been replaced by using the text on related military aircraft carrier articles. These templates were used just to transclude the same text repeatedly which is not needed. These templates are out of date. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 25. Izno (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The template is marked as deprecated and superseded by Template:Static row numbers with very few transclusions left (mostly in user space). Current usages should be replaced and template deleted. Gonnym (talk) 19:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of this non-functional template. Userfy until it works. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Created by an editor who showed up for a week in April 2023 and has not been heard from since. Userfy or delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This undocumented and uncategorized template, created in 2021, does not appear to have been adopted. There are no incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roosna-Alliku Parish and similar Estonia settlement navboxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not usable after the Administrative reform in Estonia. This navbox has been replaced by one that reflects the new administrative scheme for settlements in Estonia. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article content with no template parameters. This appears to duplicate content that is available at Results of the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. Section transclusion can be used if necessary. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of this large navbox. Created in April 2023. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar with no transclusions and no apparent substitutions. Created in 2011. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 25. Izno (talk) 16:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused link transclusion template which could be done without template formatting. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed after it was substituted on the main article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Article has the same chart as part of the article. No need for this. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only two links. While created back in April of this year, the list should be merged into the article for which this was created, then later the template can be created. Right now, this does not aid in any form of navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no oppose. I created this because the info in question was wrongly added to the category ([1]) Estopedist1 (talk) 15:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Estopedist1, since you created you can tag it under G7, but could you add this list to the article beforehand? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiCleanerMan: sorry, I am not familiar with politics of Papua New Guinea. And the adding of info is not trivial Estopedist1 (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I've added the list from this navbox to the main article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:Kolkata Circular Railway. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both templates are unused. Assuming they were already substituted for being single-use. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant as the main team navbox contains the same list of season links. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've made the main navbox useless as it doesn't have enough links to keep around. There is no need for two templates when one can do the job. And the main team navbox was doing the job just fine. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I agree. GiantSnowman 18:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, in general, there is no need for a separate seasons template, since the number of links in the main team template is typically not numerous. having two results in people putting both on every page which defeats the purpose of having separate navboxes. Frietjes (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Club dissolved in 2022. No need for this anymore. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused medal table all the content is on J/24 World Championship with improved referencing. yachty4000 ( (talk) 15:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused medal table all the content is on Swan 45 World Championship with improved referencing. yachty4000 ( (talk) 15:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused medal table all the content is on Tasar World Championship with improved referencing. yachty4000 ( (talk) 15:98, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 25. Izno (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn, see Special:Diff/1160739733. Thryduulf (talk) 08:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This table just (mostly) replicates Category:Greater Anglia franchise railway stations - with which there are some differences The only other thing it does is show which stations are request stops. Given its inaccuracy and limited value add it seems like an unnecessary maintenance burden to keep it. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose on the grounds that virtually every TOC has one of these - see Category:Rail transport navigational boxes of the United Kingdom. Templates for this purpose are, I think, deemed separate to the cats of the same name. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 07:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There might be value to something like this, but this isn't it. Where a summarized view of current quality is necessary, WikiProjects can choose to add the B class criteria checklist, which will get them most of the way. Izno (talk) 05:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ireland topics. Izno (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in the Republic of Ireland with Template:Ireland topics.
General subjects for Ireland should be on the main navbox for Ireland. No need for a sidebar that does the same thing. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redudant to the main Netherlands navbox. No need for another template covering the same subject. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant navbox as all links are in the main Portugal navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant navbox where all links are in the main Romania navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Cuba topics. Izno (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in Cuba with Template:Cuba topics.
General links for Cuba topics should be in the main navbox. No need for a separate sidebar. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. Izno (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in the OIC with Template:Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.
Should be part of the main OIC template which would help the OIC navbox from being another navbox listing of countries in an international organization. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics".v Vyvagaba (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:South Africa topics. Izno (talk) 16:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in South Africa with Template:South Africa topics.
Redundant navbox where all links should be a part of the main South Africa template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Algeria topics. Izno (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in Algeria with Template:Algeria topics.
No need for a sidebar when the main navbox can contain the general subjects about Algeria. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 07:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Suggest subst and delete. Izno (talk) 02:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant template to the main Indonesia navbox as all links are included on there. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed and redundant as all inks are in the main Philippines navbox or other navboxes. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 07:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected two of the articles this appears on, making it a single-use template.

There's probably also a valid argument that it shouldn't exist, as we shouldn't be using abbreviations like this in general. Izno (talk) 01:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Thailand topics. Izno (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in Thailand with Template:Thailand topics.
No need for a separate template for this subject. Can easily be a part of the main Thailand navbox. All the subjects in this sidebar are general subjects of Thailand which is what the navbox contains. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Sri Lanka topics. Izno (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in Sri Lanka with Template:Sri Lanka topics.
No need for a separate template for this subject. Can easily be a part of the main Sri Lanka navbox. All the subjects in this sidebar are general subjects of Sri Lanka which is what the navbox contains. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Singapore topics. Izno (talk) 16:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in Singapore with Template:Singapore topics.
No need for a separate template for this subject. Can easily be a part of the main Singapore navbox. All the subjects in this sidebar are general subjects of Singapore which is what the navbox contains. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:India topics. Izno (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Life in India with Template:India topics.
This is easily a navbox that can be covered by the main India navbox. Even on this template page in the see also section, it states that the main India template is "an expanded version of this template." So if it is expanded then there is no need for smaller templates when one template is enough to do the job. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Life in" templates are pretty useless and can be easily replaced by the "x general topics". Vyvagaba (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).