Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 24

February 24

Template:Uw-split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

• Template:Uw-split (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Niche user warning and counter to information at Wikipedia:Splitting: "if an article meets the criteria for splitting and no discussion is required, editors can be bold and carry out the split". Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 00:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

• Keep Original reason for deletion no longer applies following a rewrite of the template's content. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

• Keep Per above. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIFA World Cup winning team starting goalkeepers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

• Template:FIFA World Cup winning team starting goalkeepers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed, as there is nothing special about being a World Cup winning goalkeeper compared to any other position in the team Joseph2302 (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Not worthy of a template. Kante4 (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete - looks like a case of making a template for the sake of it. The starting goalkeeper is no more important/significant than any other member of the starting XI..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Very little to do with navigation - more of a list really. Fails much of WP:NAVBOX. #4 there is no article FIFA World Cup winning team starting goalkeeper (of course not) #3 Suspect they don't refer to each at all. Also fails #5. Nigej (talk) 15:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - one of many non-notable and unnecessary templates created by this user. GiantSnowman 18:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 19:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 19:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone above. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ION DTV, Template:Ion DTV/text

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 08:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

• Template:ION DTV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Ion DTV/text (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A lot of the Ion stations will have vastly different subchannel lineups soon. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

• I wish Scripps wouldn't mess up with Qubo (especially Qubo since they'll only be 2 OTA Kids channels) and Ion Plus (which it's schedule having too much marathons) and shut it down for their garbage Katz channels but yeah I'll say to Delete because of the messy transition. kpgamingz (rant me) 00:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete as it is becoming clear that these stations will not carry all the same subchannels past March 1. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Csworldwide1 (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).