Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 14

December 14

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 01:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary template whose only purpose is to display a file link with specific parameters. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:00, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't provide any navigation Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; probably replaced by Template:Lonzo Ball Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary template that consists solely of text. Had a transclusion in UTC offset that I substituted since it’s article content. (Anyone can feel free to revert that if they feel the need to do so.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; non-notable squad Frietjes (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; should be added to 2009 Antiguan general election or deleted. Frietjes (talk) 22:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates Template:Apollon Larissa F.C. squad. Frietjes (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; squads are saved in AfroBasket 2013 squads Frietjes (talk) 22:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; probably replaced by 2005 Andorran parliamentary election#Results Frietjes (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 21:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates the tree found in Duchess Luise of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel Frietjes (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; probably replaced by Template:Anaconda and Template:Lake Placid Frietjes (talk) 22:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates tables in 2004 American Samoan general election Frietjes (talk) 22:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

rarely used, the standard is to use {{Compact ToC}}/{{Go to top}} or others. Frietjes (talk) 21:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

rarely used Frietjes (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused and basically blank; duplicates the results in the article Frietjes (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; should be merged with the article or deleted Frietjes (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; articles are connected by Template:Airports in Ghana instead Frietjes (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

all red links Frietjes (talk) 21:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; navigation is being provided by Template:Prefectures and provinces of Morocco instead. Frietjes (talk) 21:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 21:43, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; insufficient navigation Frietjes (talk) 21:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with Rugby sevens at the 2018 Asian Games – Women's tournament Frietjes (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with Rugby sevens at the 2018 Asian Games – Men's tournament Frietjes (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

per deletion of {{split media}} Frietjes (talk) 20:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 22. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that the "Topic:" namespace was removed from the English Wikipedia a couple of years ago, rendering this template useless. (I could have tagged this template for {{Db-g7}}, but I’m bringing it here just in case.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brazil city navboxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navboxes were made up nearly entirely of duplicate links to main article, and inappropriate category WP:EGGs. Nothing left to navigate with these removed. --woodensuperman 13:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the same fashion as Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 November 21#Template:Brief, these templates were created in 2006, and are fan sites that provide no new information that cannot be gained from other more reliable "external link" websites (e.g. the BBC itself), making them unnecessary. Nor would using these websites directly in an article as a source satisfy WP:RS. Per WP:ELNO: one should generally avoid providing external links to: Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority. Some sites can provide further information, yes, as long as they're considered a reliable source. These are not. These are fan sites, not written by a recognized authority, and hence do not conform with WP:ELNO #11. It fails WP:ELYES #3, because they cannot they fail WP:ELMAYBE #4, because of the amount of uncertainty as to who these sources are. -- AlexTW 12:17, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussants may wish to look at our article about Outpost Gallifrey wherein there are mentions of it being subject to critical acclaim (and hence might be a RS). Absent any further discussion, I will close this as delete in a week's time, though.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WBGconverse 12:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:07, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These articles should just use {{Infobox basketball tournament season}}. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Round. Primefac (talk) 01:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Rnd, Template:Round and Template:Decimals.

All redundant to each other. We should move {{rnd}} to {{round}} as Template:Round is the better name, but {{rnd}} has more features when compared to {{round}} and {{decimals}} such as adding trailing zeros (expected behavior), adding commas (makes it easier to read) and removing decimals by default (expected behavior of a template of this type).

Features
Feature {{Rnd}} {{Round}} {{Decimals}}
Default for parameter 2 Yes Yes No
Removes decimals by default Yes No No
Adds commas Yes No No
Adds trailing zeros Yes No Yes
Transclusions 261,105 7,427 14,472
Module Module:Math Module:Decimals
Examples
Template Output Notes
{{template|-91234.567}}
{{Rnd}} −91,235 Rounds abs. value to integer,
inserts "comma", uses true "−"
{{Round}} −91,234.567 Keeps at least 4 digits, last digit is rounded
−34.568 Result of {{Round | -34.5678}}
{{Decimals}} Lua error... Parameter 2 required
{{template|1234.56789|5}}
{{Rnd}} 1,234.56789 Adds comma
{{Round}}} 1,234.56789
{{Decimals}} 1,234.56789
{{template|12731273.1273|-2}}
{{Rnd}} 12,731,300 Adds commas
{{Round}}} 12,731,300
{{Decimals}} 12,731,300
{{template|123456.456789|3}}
{{Rnd}} 123,456.457 Adds comma
{{Round}}} 123,456.457
{{Decimals}} 123,456.457
{{template|123456.456789|10}}
{{Rnd}} 123,456.4567890000 Adds trailing zeros
{{Round}}} 123,456.4567890000
{{Decimals}} 123,456.4567890000 Adds trailing zeros
{{template|123456.456789|-50}}
{{Rnd}} 0
{{Round}}} 0
{{Decimals}} 0

BrandonXLF (t@lk) 00:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added transclusion count and module to the first table. Johnuniq (talk) 08:57, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge: I changed the example value in the first group to exhibit the rounding feature, and tried to describe the behaviour more precisely. I ask for adding as grouping separators spaces instead of commata, because they are easier on the eye for those being accustomed to "comma" as decimal separator (pro domo). Purgy (talk) 10:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Clearly duplicate templates and should clearly be merged. One more lua module falls! {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 22:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, although disagree with Purgy. For the moment, the MOS suggests that the decimal separator is always ".", rather than ",". Perhaps the gap character could be specified with additional options, per {{val}}. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I just asked for using by default another grouping separator (a non-breaking thin(?) space) instead of a "comma", and reasoned this request by hinting to conflicting habits for the decimal separator, like others use imperial units. I did not touch the use of "." as a decimal separator. I am aware of additional possibilities via {{val}}. Purgy (talk) 08:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).