Timothy Robinson12345

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

I am staggered that you undid my reversion of the vandalism at Winter Olympic Games. Apart from the fact that he is an IP-hopping vandal who has vandalised other articles, that specific edit was not only unsourced, but was obviously incorrect at the briefest of glances. How can Thailand be named as the top nation at the 2018 Games, as it's more than a year until the Games start, and don't you think that we would have know if the 2026 Games had been allocated ahead of the scheduled decision date? Please be more careful in future. I would not normally bite a newcomer like you, but this incompetence was blatant, and on looking I see that you had previously been told to stay away from WP:NPP until you gain more experience, and I fear that the same advice is needed regarded your ability (or otherwise) to recognise vandalism. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

I am likewise warning you to stay away from WP:SPI. You have no business trying to edit there when you are tagging editors who haven't edited in ten years. Ivanvector has already warned you about this, so I'm making it plain: if you make one more disruptive edit to an administrative page, I'll block you myself for competence issues. Katie^talk 16:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

As I advised before, please do not file sockpuppet investigations cases if you do not understand the purpose. It's apparent that you still do not understand what sockpuppetry is, from the case you filed today on ten-years-idle accounts with only a vague reference to common IP addresses. I have deleted that case, because accusing editors of sockpuppetry without good evidence is considered a personal attack. You are most welcome to ask questions about these processes if you would like to learn more, but please do not edit these administrative boards if you don't know what you're doing. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

You have not given me a proper warningLt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

• Timothy, please, I assure you, this is all the warning you require- and all you will now get I'm afraid. Please take the advice rather than try and pick holes in it. All the best, O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 14:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok I will stop Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)