B This user is currently busy
but should return shortly.


cand q

edit

Thank you for standing for arbitrator. I am far away from it all (travel, mourning), not in the mood, so just an informal question you can answer or ignore:

What does this 2024 DYK tell you about infoboxes for classical composers in 2024? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate and thank you for the question, Gerda, but it tells me nothing. I don't have the first clue where you want me to go with that. Katietalk 17:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, 11 years ago infoboxes for classical composers were a hot topic. If you look at the talk pages of the 5 composers, do you think they still are? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's not what you asked me to do, but okay – looks to me like the Mahler page doesn't have an infobox and there's a lively discussion going on about it. Crossing my fingers that it doesn't descend into chaos and misery. Katietalk 13:12, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
story · music · places
Sorry if I was unclear. - November was rich in sadness and happiness for me, expressed in music. Regarding my question, I found one so far who looked into the matter and didn't stay at the surface, Simonm223. There are two composers on the Main page today, Siegfried Thiele and Aaron Copland. I find the response of my friend Jerome Kohl to a question on Copland's article talk promising. What do you think? - There were more participants in Mahler, and what do you think about the strength of arguments? - Have you ever seen an infobox discussion in "chaos and misery"? (More about compromise on my talk.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ah, infobox discussions. We've had how many cases about infoboxes at this point? People yelling and whining and getting blocked and retiring and unretiring and bans? If that's not chaos and misery, I don't know what is. As far as the strength of arguments goes, I just took a quick skim because some of the usual infobox folks are there and I've heard their peace before, and ain't nothin' new under the sun. Some poor schmuck is gonna close that and much angst and gnashing of teeth will ensue and I look forward to seeing the results of the Infobox discussions 48 case sometime in 2032. I wish I had more to give you about it, but I just don't.

I'm glad Simonm223 was able to give you an answer you liked, but I am not going to give an opinion on the strength or weakness of arguments there. I'm very sorry for the loss of your friend, and I hope the music you love helped bring you some peace. Katietalk 16:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. My view is different and simple: infobox discussions happen only on the few FAs of a few editors (such as Mahler), and if we place them under some special protection for intentionally being different from the rest of Wikipedia, we are done. Most classical composers today come with an infobox without any discussion. - Today's story comes from a DYK about a concert that fascinated me, and you can listen! For my taste, the hook has too little music - I miss the unusual scoring and the specific dedication - but it comes instead with a name good for viewcount. All this is of minor importance looking at life and death. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:29, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
On the Main page today Jean Sibelius on his birthday. Listening to Beethoven's Fifth from the opening of Notre-Dame de Paris. We sang in choirs today. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Listen today to the (new) Perplexities after Escher. - Congratulations to being elected! Could you look at Samuel Barber and tell me if you miss something in his infobox? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:37, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Listen today to Beethoven's 3rd cello sonata, on his birthday - it was a hook in the 2020 DYK set when his 250th birthday was remembered. I picked a recording with Antonio Meneses, because he was on my sad list this year, and I was in Brazil (see places), and I love his playing. - I can happily report that the Barber situation was resolved. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red December 2024

edit
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

edit

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

User:Jonathan duski and User:Ezraazx

edit

As an editor who tagged the former's article for deletion and noticed that the latter was likely a sockpuppet, who were they found to be socks of when blocked? Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Passengerpigeon: Looks like Dilovan Kovli is the master. I didn't see obvious sleepers but there are quite a few accounts with no edits on that range, so it's possible he's got more accounts saved up. If you see more suspicious edits on Kovli or those other topics, let me know or file at SPI. Katietalk 18:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


List of attacks on the United States

edit

Hello KrakatoaKatie! I came across your profile over on WikiProject Military history, where you indicated you enjoyed editing topics around American military history. I've been working on a big project over the last few weeks: List of attacks on the United States. The aim is to have a list of every time the U.S. (government/military) was attacked, but not when the U.S. was attacking. My hope is to create list of attacks by the United States once this list is finished.

Well anyway, I wanted to see if you would be interested in helping me put together some of the summaries for the list. I am fairly sure most if not all of the attacks themselves are on the list. But, I'm still working to get the summaries and references put together for each of them. If you are interested or have any questions, feel free to message me back here or on my talk page anytime! If not, I completely understand. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 16:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate the request, but my attention is probably going to be elsewhere for a while. Good luck with your list! Katietalk 04:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kataeb Party Protection

edit

Hi. Thank you for giving Kataeb Party semi-protection status through 12/20/24. Unfortunately, IP vandalism on this page has been an issue for many years. I do not anticipate that it will improve. Would it be possible for Kataeb Party to be granted indefinite semi protection status? Firecat93 (talk) 03:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

We're going to start here and see what happens. I've done this for a very long time, and I don't want to protect it longer than is necessary, so escalating lengths is the way I and most admins approach this. If they return after protection expires, simply make a new RFPP request. Katietalk 04:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay, will do Firecat93 (talk) 10:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Katie the arb is back

edit

I'm stoked that you and Liz are the top vote-getters, with Worm right behind. I won't be joining you but that's not terribly surprising. Keep those young-uns in line, will ya? Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 00:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the 2025 Arbitration Committee

edit

Congratulations on your success in the elections and welcome to the 2025 Arbitration Committee. This is the first part of your induction onto the Arbitration Committee.

Please use the EmailUser function to indicate the email address you'd like to use for ArbCom and functionary business.

Before you can be subscribed to any mailing lists or assigned CheckUser or Oversight permissions, you must sign the Wikimedia Foundation's confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (L37) and the VRT users confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (L45). Please confirm that your username is listed on the Access to nonpublic personal data policy/Noticeboard. If isn't, and you haven't signed the agreements, please do this promptly and let me know when you have signed them. Instructions for signing can be found here. Again, you must sign both agreements listed in the instructions. If you have signed but your username is not listed on the noticeboard, please let me know.

Over the coming days, you will receive a small number of emails as part of the induction process. Please carefully read them. If they are registration emails, please follow any instructions in them to finalise registration. You can contact me or any other arbitrator directly if you have difficulty with the induction process.

Thank you for volunteering to serve on the committee. We very much look forward to introducing ourselves to you on the mailing list and to working with you this term.

For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 01:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee

edit

The Electoral Commission is pleased to announce that you have been appointed for a two-year term to the Arbitration Committee effective January 1, 2025. Congratulations on the appointment.

On behalf of ElectCom: —CYBERPOWER (Merry Christmas) 14:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seeking advice for potential IP sockpuppeteering

edit

Good day. I'm in need of advice if this constitutes a legit sock case.

Currently IP address 155.69.190.63 has been reported in this ANI case, but there is another IP address sharing identical language and patterns: 155.69.184.1. Similar patterns in WP:HOUNDING, personal attacks and bad faith can be seen with both IP addresses.

[1] [2] [3] [4]

Further checks indicate that both IP addresses coincidentally are Singapore-based: [5] [6]

Please advise if there is credible grounds for a WP:SPI and the way forward. Thank you! hundenvonPG (talk) 00:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Other than to say your two IPs are probably the same person operating out of the dynamic IP range assigned to that school, I have nothing to add to the ANI discussion currently underway. Filing at SPI will do nothing for the reason I just described. I advise your to stop coming to the talk pages of various admins and allow that ANI thread to play out. Katietalk 03:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

2025 Arbitration Committee

edit

The Arbitration Committee welcomes the following new and returning members following their election by the community. Their two-year terms formally begin on 1 January 2025:

The one-year terms of these members also begin on 1 January 2025:

Upon meeting the Wikimedia Foundation's criteria for access to non-public personal data and signing its corresponding confidentiality agreement, all incoming members will be subscribed to all Committee-managed email lists, assigned the CheckUser and Oversight permissions for use in office, and given access to the CheckUser and Oversight queues on the VRT system.

We also thank our outgoing colleagues, whose terms end on 31 December 2024:

Outgoing members are eligible to retain the CheckUser and Oversight permissions, to remain active on cases accepted before their term ended, and to remain subscribed to the functionaries' and arbitration clerks' mailing lists following their terms on the Arbitration Committee. To that effect:

  • Stewards are requested to remove the permission(s) noted from the following outgoing members, who have not chosen to retain them, after 31 December 2024:
    CheckUser: Firefly, L235
    Oversight: Firefly, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees
  • Outgoing members are eligible to remain active on cases opened before their term ended if they wish. That will be noted on the proposed decision talk page of affected case(s).
  • All outgoing members will remain subscribed to the functionaries' mailing list.
  • All outgoing members will be unsubscribed from the clerks-l mailing list, with the exception of Firefly, Guerillero, and Moneytrees, who have chosen to remain subscribed.

On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 02:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § 2025 Arbitration Committee
congratulations. Crafterstar (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oops

edit

What did I do wrong there? 🆃🆁🆂03:27, 14 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Trs9k: Please see WP:OUTING. Speculation counts as outing. The ways to provide information privately are listed on that page. Katietalk 03:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Lesson learned! Thank you and enjoy the weekend :) 🆃🆁🆂04:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Is there any way I could get a copy of what I wrote? 🆃🆁🆂04:37, 14 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, no. Katietalk 13:51, 14 December 2024 (UTC)Reply