Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tigmo9098! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

Speedy deletion nomination of The New Federal State of China

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as The New Federal State of China, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Orenburg1 (talk) 07:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at China, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 21:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The New Federal State of China

edit
 

A tag has been placed on The New Federal State of China requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Lack of any coverage by reputable secondary sources.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 21:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The New Federal State of China

edit
 

The article The New Federal State of China has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guidelines, per WP:SIGCOV. Lack of any significant coverage from independent and reliable secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 23:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The New Federal State of China for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The New Federal State of China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Federal State of China until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mys_721tx (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The New Federal State of China, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SCP-2000 15:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Further reversions

edit

Hi, before making any further reversions on The New Federal State of China I suggest you read WP:3RR. Kind regards. FOARP (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The New Federal State of China, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 00:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Pls do not vandalize my entry.

edit

This is the second time that editors shortened my entry to just a few paragraphs. Edits are welcome but deleting entire sections is offensive. I will report you to higher Admin if you do not stop doing this vandalism. --Tigmo9098 (talk) 01:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are free to report anyone you think is behaving badly at WP:ANI. However please note that Wikipedia is (within reason) an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. No-one owns a particular article. In particular, it is perfectly OK to delete pieces of unsourced text that are highly opinionated, not neutral, and apparently done to promote the subject. Please read WP:PROMO, WP:SOAP, WP:OR. FOARP (talk) 08:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Also, if multiple editors are all coming here and telling you to stop doing something, it's probably wise to stop doing it. FOARP (talk) 08:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Tigmo9098! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Triggered a protection filter, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Tigmo9098! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My page was nominated for deletion. Help!  :(, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Rule of Law (organisations) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rule of Law (organisations). Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 06:39, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rule of Law (organisations) (August 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rule of Law (organisations)

edit

  Hello, Tigmo9098. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rule of Law (organisations), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rule of Law (organisations)

edit
 

Hello, Tigmo9098. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rule of Law".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply