SchroCat

"doing what little one can to increase the general stock of knowledge is as respectable an object of life, as one can in any likelihood pursue" Charles Darwin
"Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience" Jean Cocteau

Articles seeking peer review
before featured article candidacy

• May 30 Chinese characters
• June 6 Jenna Ortega
• July 29 Beebo the God of War
• August 2 Dexter's Laboratory
• August 15 1939 Liechtenstein putsch
• August 23 River
• August 26 Tropical Storm Kai-tak
• August 29 Ivan the Terrible (1945 film)
• September 3 A Space for the Unbound
• September 17 Lock's Quest
• September 27 Pearl (X)
• October 4 Cisnormativity
• October 16 Veiqia
• October 19 Virtual Self (EP)
• October 21 Crohn's Disease
• October 22 Stingless bee
• October 23 Austin J. Tobin Plaza
• October 29 William D. Hoard
• October 29 Andrea Navagero
• October 30 Mind
• November 3 Bejeweled (video game)
• November 5 James Scott (boxer)
• November 15 The Legend of Dragoon
• November 19 "Kill Bill" (SZA song)
• November 20 Beachy Head (poem)

Unanswered peer reviews

New FAC and PR

To any friendly talk page watchers, I have:

Caption text

Header text	Header text	Header text
	Martha Bradley	@FAC

If there is anyone who fancies commenting, I would be grateful. Cheers - SchroCat (talk)

TFA dates

Hi, you've put January 2024 instead of 2025 for some of your recent additions to the FA talk pages - could you check please? Thanks. — Voice of Clam (talk) 11:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Done, thanks. - SchroCat (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Man with the Golden Gun, wraparound cover.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:The Man with the Golden Gun, wraparound cover.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 12:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

It's a false rationale to think FREER applies, unless you can explain it here. One non-free image showing part of the cover has been replaced by another non-free image showing the whole cover. Both were non-free, but the whole cover actually manages to show the whole book title, not part of it. - SchroCat (talk) 12:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)