Welcome!

edit

Hello, CipherCraft618, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Wikishovel (talk) 16:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello CipherCraft618, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to The Autobiography of William Carlos Williams has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 16:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Icarus Needs for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Icarus Needs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icarus Needs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of OFF (video game)

edit

Hello, CipherCraft618. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, OFF (video game), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Something Something Soup Something

edit
 

The article Something Something Soup Something has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The1337gamer (talk) 09:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Momodora) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Momodora, CipherCraft618!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add some references that are not primary sources. I would suggest some of the reviews that can be found here. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:31, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kuso (video game) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuso (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuso (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Izno (talk) 13:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rexaura for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rexaura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rexaura until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Izno (talk) 15:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:RexauraModDBCover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:RexauraModDBCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KusoByFredWoodSteamArt.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KusoByFredWoodSteamArt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Petscop

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Petscop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The1337gamer (talk) 07:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Petscop for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Petscop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petscop (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Momodora III for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Momodora III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Momodora III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Izno (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Momodora3ItchioCoverArt.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Momodora3ItchioCoverArt.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:PetscopTitleScreen.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:PetscopTitleScreen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Star Comes to Earth for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Comes to Earth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Comes to Earth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:07, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lucid9 for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucid9 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucid9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucid9SteamHeader.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Lucid9SteamHeader.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Toby Raidiation Fox listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Toby Raidiation Fox. Since you had some involvement with the Toby Raidiation Fox redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:MarkDunnGrayscale.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:MarkDunnGrayscale.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Pannenkoek2012MainChannelIcon.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Pannenkoek2012MainChannelIcon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Blood Moon Ball

edit
 

Hello, AntiGravityMaster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blood Moon Ball".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 17:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:UltimateShowdown GroupShot.png

edit
 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jersey salute listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jersey salute. Since you had some involvement with the Jersey salute redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MB 03:34, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, AntiGravityMaster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, AntiGravityMaster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of Super Mario speedrunning records

edit
 

Hello, AntiGravityMaster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Super Mario speedrunning records".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:44, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Minecraft

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Minecraft you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of King of Scorpions -- King of Scorpions (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@King of Scorpions: Hi there, it seems like you have not started the review or have not followed the proper procedure when doing so. Please read these instructions on how to start a review. Thanks 1.02 editor (T/C) 12:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Stanley Parable

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Stanley Parable you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Stanley Parable

edit

The article The Stanley Parable you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Stanley Parable for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Minecraft

edit

The article Minecraft you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Minecraft for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of King of Scorpions -- King of Scorpions (talk) 03:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Stanley Parable

edit

The article The Stanley Parable you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:The Stanley Parable for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 10:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hermitcraft for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermitcraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermitcraft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. theinstantmatrix (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Hermitcraft. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Minecraft GA nominations

edit

AntiGravityMaster, for the second time this month, your GA nomination of Minecraft has been removed by TheJoebro64. There are reasons for this, and I thought it would help for me to let you know what they are.

First, per the GA nomination instructions, Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. As someone whose edits include 33 minor edits out of a total of 36, you are not a "significant contributor". So you need to make the consultation on Talk:Minecraft to gain consensus that the article is ready for a GA nomination before proceeding, and you haven't. (A typical consultation lasts at least seven days to give editors an adequate chance to chime in.)

Second, as TheJoebro64 put it in his edit summary when reverting your earlier nomination, many of the issues from the GAR remain unresolved. Back in 2018, Minecraft was delisted from having been a Good Article due to a number of significant issues raised in the Good Article Reassessment (GAR); you'll want to read the reassessment and the comments therein by Czar, Hellknowz, and TheJoebro64 to see what was considered lacking, since it's clear from TheJoebro64's recent actions (and edit summaries) that work still needs to be done on them.

Technically, these were not "quickfails" as no review was opened, but the removal of out-of-process nominations. The ultimate effect is the same. If you want to nominate Minecraft at some point in the future, the article will need to have been improved in order to address the outstanding issues first; otherwise, it is sure ultimately to be failed whether your talk-page consultation is successful or not. Best of luck in your work to improve the article to that level. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Hermitcraft Season7Banner.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Hermitcraft Season7Banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:DaveyWreden 2014Gameloading.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:DaveyWreden 2014Gameloading.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:DaveyWreden 2014Gameloading.png listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DaveyWreden 2014Gameloading.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CloneHeroLogo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:CloneHeroLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 17:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are still marking clearly non-minor edits as minor. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 21:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Sorry about that, I figured they were minor enough. AntiGravityMaster (talk) 21:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Source for Lena Raine edits

edit

Hey there! Do you have a source or citation for your recent adds to the Discography list on the Lena Raine article? If so, could you add them? Thanks - Whisperjanes (talk) 22:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Those were all from her Bandcamp. Not sure if that's a good source, but I'll add it. AntiGravityMaster (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Appreciate it. I'm not sure about Bandcamp either, but I always think it's better to know where it comes from either way (in case editors want to know the source down the line). - Whisperjanes (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheUncensoredLibrary Entrance.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TheUncensoredLibrary Entrance.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Petscop:Draft

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Petscop:Draft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 22:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:BFBBRehydrated CoverArt.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:BFBBRehydrated CoverArt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheLongingVideoGame Header.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TheLongingVideoGame Header.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of SiIvaGunner for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SiIvaGunner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiIvaGunner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kingoflettuce (talk) 05:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for The Longing (video game)

edit

On 28 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Longing (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the video game The Longing can take up to 400 days to complete? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Longing (video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Longing (video game)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Longing (video game)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Longing (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 23:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Longing (video game)

edit

The article The Longing (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Longing (video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 11:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Longing (video game)

edit

The article The Longing (video game) you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:The Longing (video game) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of SiIvaGunner

edit

  Hello! Your submission of SiIvaGunner at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:SiivaGunnerExample.ogg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:SiivaGunnerExample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Template:Did you know nominations/SiIvaGunner

edit

OmegaFallon, this nomination does not currently meet the criteria, since the absolute minimum is 1500 prose characters and it's at 1312. Are you planning to expand the article anew, or should we close the nomination? It's been over a week since you were pinged after its promotion was reversed due to the current issues. We need to hear from you soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article had been going through a lot of changes recently, as well as a deletion renomination. The way the article is currently is roughly the most we can get it at without anyone raising concerns about original research. So, I'd say closing it is all that can be done. Harmonia per misericordia. OmegaFallon (talk) 19:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

New message from Narutolovehinata5

edit
 
Hello, OmegaFallon. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/SiIvaGunner.
Message added 02:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive

edit
  The Invisible Barnstar
Thank you for completing 2 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias talk 07:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Kolbeinsey Aerial2020.png

edit
 

The file File:Kolbeinsey Aerial2020.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superceded by better quality, public domain File:Kolbeinsey_Aerial_2020.jpg on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –DMartin 17:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

FTR: I have requested speedy deletion of this image per WP:F5 (orphaned fair use). As there is now a public domain image from the same flight, there is no need to retain this version. Kahastok talk 19:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Windmill of the Aldehuela moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Windmill of the Aldehuela, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fairy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FAE. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Death and Taxes (video game) has been accepted

edit
 
Death and Taxes (video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OceanHok (talk) 06:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Fritz and Chesster

edit

Hi OmegaFallon! I noticed your edits to Talk:Fritz and Chesster and am wondering why you categorised the article as C-class for WPChess and a Stub for WPEducation and WPVG. In my experience, I've never come across practice of giving different classes for different WikiProjects with the exception of A-Class reviews performed by a small number of WikiProjects. Also, I believe the article has too much content and secondary source material to be classed as a stub, but I prefer not to rate articles that I have written the current version of myself. Thanks! — Bilorv (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Talk:Roblox does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 14:40, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about not using edit summaries lately. I've been doing a large amount of edits to clear through an assessment backlog, so I've been leaving out edit summaries to cut down the time it takes me to go through them. Harmonia per misericordia. OmegaFallon (talk) 14:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

i designed anarcho-communist flag for turkey

edit

(bad english, sorry)i see your information on your user article. there it is """This user is an Anarcho-Communist.""". you may like it: https://i.hizliresim.com/Sm2pUE.png Modern primat (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Among Us, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cairo2k18(talk)(contribs) 11:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Space Mafia" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Space Mafia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 30#Space Mafia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Clone Hero

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clone Hero".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
Thank you for your research and writing improvements to Among Us. It's a high quality article on Wikipedia. Good luck with your good article pursuits. Right cite (talk) 04:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Input and mentorship

edit

OmegaFallon, I highly respect your quality work on Wikipedia, especially your good article work on The Stanley Parable.

I'm dealing with a less than civil user that is not being quite kind to me.

I've tried really really really hard to do a lot of research over at the article = InnerSloth.

Instead of being met with praise, I was faced with a drive-by-tagging.

I improved the page from stub when I first got there, to:

major research and expansion.

OmegaFallon, you seem like someone dedicated to improving Wikipedia overall, and quality in particular.

That is why I am coming to you for advice, and input, and perhaps even mentorship.

Thank you,

Right cite (talk) 06:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I'm flattered that you'd say that. I've taken a brief look at the discussion page, and it does seem like a lot of the talk there isn't very productive. It's a shame when you have to interact with users like that, but my advice is to simply not sink to their level. If you act civil towards them, they'll usually get bored and stop talking, since most of them are just looking to get a reaction out of you. Either that, or you can ignore them entirely. As far as keeping the page and improving it, I agree with you that it seems like it's notable enough for an article, and I see a few others in the discussion who agree. I'll read through the article and post my support later today. Hopefully things go well for you and the Innersloth article. Harmonia per misericordia. OmegaFallon (talk) 11:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Shadowrvn728. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Among Us, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hey! I know this was obv good faith but i’m pretty sure Sausage Roll is satire and is definitely not a reliable source. [WP:RS] Shadowrvn728 (talk) 16:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Among Us

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Among Us you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 18:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Spacemafia" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Spacemafia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#Space Mafia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Among Us

edit

The article Among Us you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Among Us for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 05:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Among Us

edit

The article Among Us you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Among Us for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Teamwork Barnstar
Congratulations on your "Good Article" work on the article Among Us, job well done! Right cite (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lasagna Cat

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lasagna Cat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:SiivaGunner

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SiivaGunner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Shrek Retold

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shrek Retold".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Never Give Up (video game)

edit

  Hello, OmegaFallon. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Never Give Up (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:BirdGut

edit

  Hello, OmegaFallon. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:BirdGut, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 06:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Never Give Up (video game)

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Never Give Up".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:BirdGut

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BirdGut".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Million Award for Among Us

edit
  The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Among Us (estimated annual readership: 3,100,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 16:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Half-Life VR but the AI is Self-Aware

edit

  Hello, OmegaFallon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Half-Life VR but the AI is Self-Aware, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Tenacious D, The Metal sample.ogg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Tenacious D, The Metal sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:StarComesToEarthFlamingMewni.png listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StarComesToEarthFlamingMewni.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 19:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Among Us

edit

I was wondering if you wanted to collaborate on bringing Among Us to FA. Ovinus (talk) 22:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:YumeNikkiTitleScreen.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:YumeNikkiTitleScreen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hermitcraft

edit

  Hello, OmegaFallon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hermitcraft, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reactions to the death of Queen Elizabeth II

edit

Hello, I am wondering if you could help rewrite the social media since I'm going to be busy today. The goal is to show the mixed reactions from the mournful, indifferent, memes, and the celebratory with their reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.166.183.180 (talk) 19:16, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Presentable Liberty

edit

  Hello, OmegaFallon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Presentable Liberty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Arched roof moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for creating Arched roof. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Presentable Liberty

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Presentable Liberty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

Please familiarize yourself better with WP:BLP if you plan on continuing to edit BLP articles. A majority of the content you added to this article is unsourced. Unsourced content is generally not okay, but it's really not okay in a BLP article under a section called "criticisms" you created. Such a mistake from someone who is an experienced editor is entirely unacceptable - do not do this again. Sergecross73 msg me 02:34, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Sergecross73 Well, I guess I'm a bit wrong about what qualifies as a source. I'll back off from the article to be safe. I've done most of the work I could see needing done anyways. Harmonia per misericordia. OmegaFallon (talk) 02:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

BLP primary source policy

edit

I saw that you recently expanded a biographical article, and added the full name of the subject, using only court documents as a source. While this seems to have been done in good faith, please be aware that court records are never an acceptable source for a biography of a living person, as Wikipedia is not and should never be a doxxing website. The Midnite Wolf (talk) 04:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Fesh Pince of Blair

edit
 

A tag has been placed on The Fesh Pince of Blair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

'Til Death Do Us Blart moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, 'Til Death Do Us Blart, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TilDeathDoUsBlart CoverArt.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TilDeathDoUsBlart CoverArt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Longing

edit

I have put it up for FAC. Just wanted to let you know, since you were a major contributor to the article. The Night Watch (talk) 14:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Here's to hoping it makes it. Harmonia per misericordia. OmegaFallon (talk) 15:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hurrah! It passed! The Night Watch (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wonderful news! Cheers :) Harmonia per misericordia. OmegaFallon (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Confessor Jiji" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Confessor Jiji and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 20 § Hollow Knight characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Several similar redirects you created are also nominated in the same place. A7V2 (talk) 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Template:R from Katakana" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R from Katakana and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 22 § Template:R from Katakana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Template:R from Hiragana" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R from Hiragana and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 22 § Template:R from Hiragana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Snowgrave (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Snowgrave (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

List of Pokémon in <insert game>

edit

Hey OmegaFallon. I was reviewing redirects and I noticed a few of your recent creations, such as:

My concern with redirects such as these is that it's not indicated at the target (List of generation II Pokémon in this case) which Pokemon are available in which games. I know that, between Gold and Silver, there are some that are only available in each version (same with Red and Blue, Sapphire and Ruby, and I assume later generations). Additionally, there were also Pokemon from earlier generations that are appear in later games. There was quite a few Pokemon that were available in Gold and Silver from gen I that aren't found at List of generation II Pokémon. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

My purpose in creating these redirects is for interwiki links with pre-existing Wikidata items. They have to redirect somewhere and I feel that just linking to the generation list is close enough, but if you feel otherwise you're free to change them, I won't mind. I'm less concerned about where the redirects point and more concerned with them existing, for my purposes. Harmonia per misericordia. OmegaFallon (talk) 15:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
After some searching (since it's been over 15 years since I played the games) it looks like all the original Pokemon were also available in Gold and Silver. My concern is that they would end up being deleted for being inaccurate. This gets more complicated in the later games as they pick and choose which of the Pokemon to make available (though that's just from my memory from 15+ years ago playing Sapphire and Ruby). Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

"List of Pokémon in Pokémon Gold" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect List of Pokémon in Pokémon Gold has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 20 § List of Pokémon in Pokémon Gold until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

"List of Pokémon in Pokémon Silver" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect List of Pokémon in Pokémon Silver has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 20 § List of Pokémon in Pokémon Silver until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

"List of Pokémon in Pokémon Gold and Silver" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect List of Pokémon in Pokémon Gold and Silver has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 20 § List of Pokémon in Pokémon Gold and Silver until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Consanguinamory

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Consanguinamory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Sources don't indicate notability for this contested and fringe neologism. This will never be an article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ★Trekker (talk) 01:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@StarTrekker sure go ahead, I can't translate Japanese anyways Harmonia per misericordia. OmegaFallon (talk) 01:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, OmegaFallon,
I restored this draft because it was mistakenly deleted as CSD G13 even though it was not eligible for this criteria. Are you saying that you are requesting the draft be deleted? In that case, I can re-delete it as a CSD G7 (page creator's request). Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Arched roof

edit

  Hello, OmegaFallon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arched roof, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Arched roof

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arched roof".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:DDLCPoemCreation.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:DDLCPoemCreation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Captain Spaceboy" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Captain Spaceboy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 29 § Captain Spaceboy until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Capt. Spaceboy" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Capt. Spaceboy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 29 § Capt. Spaceboy until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Space Boyfriend" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Space Boyfriend has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 29 § Space Boyfriend until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Space Ex-Husband" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Space Ex-Husband has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 29 § Space Ex-Husband until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Space Husband" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Space Husband has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 29 § Space Husband until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Snowglobe Mountain" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Snowglobe Mountain has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 29 § Snowglobe Mountain until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Consanguinamory

edit

  Hello, OmegaFallon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Consanguinamory, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

"HermitCraft" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect HermitCraft has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § HermitCraft until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Consanguinamory

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Consanguinamory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 03:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

White Ball

edit

I reverted your edit to White Ball because the song you added is not notable, nor is the album the song is on. In fact, the redirect seemed to point to content which didn't mention the song. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:'Til Death Do Us Blart

edit
 

Hello, OmegaFallon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "'Til Death Do Us Blart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 06:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Arbitrary arrest and detention, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 04:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:PetscopTitleScreen.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:PetscopTitleScreen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

OFF (video game)

edit

Not sure if you're still interested in this article, but this should help with citing it. [1] - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 06:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for The Stanley Parable

edit

The Stanley Parable has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Kung Fu Man (talk) 07:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:StanleyParable BossOffice3WayComp.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:StanleyParable BossOffice3WayComp.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheStanleyParable DemoFacility.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TheStanleyParable DemoFacility.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Moo Moo Meadows" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Moo Moo Meadows has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 12 § Moo Moo Meadows until a consensus is reached. Mia Mahey (talk) 21:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Outsmart" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Outsmart has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 30 § Outsmart until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Pixel art Wizard Portrait.svg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 19:34, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply