Nirmal95

Welcome!

Hello, Nirmal95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Indian incometax department, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bentogoa (talk) 09:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Indian incometax department

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Indian incometax department. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Central Board for Direct Taxes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Central Board for Direct Taxes - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bentogoa (talk) 09:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Corruption in India. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Never usual racial/caste-ist/generally offensive words to describe groups of people in Wikipedia. All articles must be neutral and verified by reliable sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of converts to Islam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Radia tapes controversy

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Radia tapes controversy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you!--Ioannes Pragensis (talk) 07:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Nirmal95 (talk) 01:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Income Tax Department.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Income Tax Department.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Indian Revenue Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fiscal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Central excise officers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Central excise officers.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 14:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Stillwater86

You left a message on User:Stillwater86 You should use talk:Stillwater86 for messages. The user will not receive notification of changes to his user page. Jim1138 (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Customs officer tysgnns03 ket 620892e.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Customs officer tysgnns03 ket 620892e.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.thehindu.com/news/states/tamil-nadu/article1983841.ece. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Income Tax Department (Bangalore) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Income Tax Department (Bangalore) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Income Tax Department (Bangalore) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Removal of AfD notice

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Salih (talk) 06:24, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Good work Nirmal95 (talk) 06:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Good work Nirmal! Nirmal95 (talk) 06:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

IRS (C&CE) & IRS (IT)

Dear NIrmal,

Wiki is for presentation of facts. There is nothing as IRS in India. It is either IRS(IT) or IRS(C&CE). And it is not propaganda of IRS(C&CE), just plain presentation of facts regarding IRS(C&CE). Btw, I like IRS(IT) too!! And, do not try to belittle the work profile IRS(IT) by including things which IT does not do!! IRS(IT) has a interesting work profile of its own. If you can pls add to work profile of IRS(IT), rather than undo sections/photographs of IRS(C&CE)!!!

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.155.51 (talk) 18:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

From Vence1234

I moved this over from your user page where it had been incorrectly places Qwyrxian (talk) 02:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Nirmal :).. IRS page has become too huge for a single article isn't it? We keep the common details in the IRS page and Why do not we bifurcate latter history and other details into IRS(C&CE) and IRS(IT)  ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vence1234 (talk • contribs)

File permission problem with File:DTAA cbdt.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DTAA cbdt.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation, you may be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing (including textual copyright violations, persistent tendentious and unencyclopedic contributions, and personal attacks). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nirmal95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Personal vengeance by Future Perfect at Sunrise!!!!!!!!

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM. Kinu ^t/_c 03:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:INCOME TAX INDIAN).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:INCOME TAX INDIAN).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Indian Revenue Service, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fiscal and Vigilance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

New image problems

You again uploaded several images with dubious copyright claims. You said they were from "Hindu newspaper" and licensed under the GFDL. What made you think The Hindu publishes images under the GFDL? If you simply invented that license in order to have a way to upload the images here, then please say so now, so I can quickly delete them. If not, I expect you will provide proof, within the next 7 days, showing where and how that newspaper placed the images under that license. If you do neither, you will be blocked. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:44, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

In addition, I found that all the new text you recently added to Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation was copy-and-pasted from other websites. This means it is a copyright violation. Please take this as a final warning: Wikipedia editing just doesn't work this way. You need to work completely differently if you want to continue working on this project. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Join the Community!

Hi Nirmal,

Do consider joining the WikiProject India Mailing List (https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-en) which provides communication for the community.

You may also like to add WP:INB to your watchlist.

Be sure to update yourself at Geographical distribution of Indian Wikipedians. (You'll need to create a user id for it).

AshLin (talk) 16:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the WikiLove - I love Brownies! Yumm! AshLin (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:INCOME TAX INDIAN).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:INCOME TAX INDIAN).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your message

Re: your message. What can I help you with? SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:34, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Blocked again

Since you have continued with the same kind of copyright-violating edits, I have blocked you again. This time the block is of indefinite length, i.e. until you can demonstrate here on your talk page that you have understood how and why your editing was wrong and how to edit more appropriately. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC) ok what should i do???????(Nirmal95 (talk) 08:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC))

Fut.Perf. ☼

Can you tell me what to do again clearly please??)(Nirmal95 (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC))

While I can't speak for FPaS, I can speak as another admin: you need to explain what was wrong with your previous edits, show a decent understanding of how copyright works, and then explain how you'll behave differently in the future. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Paulos Mar Gregorios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princeton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nirmal95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me i have understood my wrongs i will not do any more copyright violations

Decline reason:

Technical decline of this one - replaced by new request, below -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See Qwyrxian's post above: "you need to explain what was wrong with your previous edits, show a decent understanding of how copyright works, and then explain how you'll behave differently in the future". Max Semenik (talk) 11:09, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and you're tagged as a sock - in such case you need to request an unblock from your first account. Max Semenik (talk) 11:10, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nirmal95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have understood my wrongs i will not copy past to wikipedia again.I have understood how to USE wikipedia better.(i have matured :))It was totally my fault why i got blocked last time.I promise i will not do it again.I amsorry to all wikipedia editors whom i have caused any fault.I am looking forward for an unblock,i will behave properly and act like good wikipedian.

Decline reason:

You'll need to request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:45, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nirmal95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

THIS IS MY FIRST ACCOUNT.(Nirmal95 (talk) 07:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC))

Decline reason:

No, it isn't. This account is a confirmed sockpuppet of Vrghs jacob (talk · contribs), an account created in 2008. This account Nirmal95 was created in 2011. It is not your first account. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nirmal95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please,please i am not a sock puppet of vrghs jacob,please investigate further,wikipedians please.vrghs jacob himself has complained against me because of my editing ask future perfect at sunrise,he will tell you i am a bad editor,but not a sock puppet.please wikipeidan editors please try to understand.see in the indian revenue service page he himself has asked to block me.please clarify with future perfect at sunrise.i am not a sockpuppet of anyone.i have only made another account nirmal2012mathew which is again blocked because i am a suspected sock puppet.i have no links whatsoever with vrghs jacob and his other socks.please understand

Decline reason:

Even if you were not a sockpuppet, the question of whether you understand the copyright policy is by no means answered. I think it would be better if you enjoy reading Wikipedia but don't write it.FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nirmal95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

fisher queen with all respect,i have already demonstrated that above,the the allegation of a sock puppet came so i had to counter that ,you are again asking me the same question.

Decline reason:

This account was originally blocked for copyright violations. Regardless of what other allegations come up, you will need to address that to be unblocked. You have not satisfactorily addressed this nor demonstrated that you understand what copyright involves or why it's a serious issue.

Moving on to the sockpuppetry stuff, you admitted to evading your block with User:Nirmal2012mathew and I've just confirmed that with checkuser. I can't confirm whether or not you are User:Vrghs jacob, but your technical data is rather similar to the most recent of his confirmed accounts. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.