User talk:My Lord/Archives 1

Welcome!

Hi, Anmolbhat. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . —usernamekiran(talk) 18:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, I'm Usernamekiran. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bramha have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The photo that you updated, gives a wrong impression that bramha is fierce/short tempered. Also the image is a possible violation copyright. Thanks for your contributions again. :-) —usernamekiran(talk) 18:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Photos downloaded from Internet

Hi,
Thanks for your contributions to wikipedia. It is really appreciated. But wikipedia does not allow copyrighted content to be uploaded on wikipedia. Most of the photographs uploaded on internet are copyrighted by some person, or some website. You can find the detailed policy regarding copyrights of photos here: Wikipedia:Image use policy. I hope you upload only the content that you have the copyrights for. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I just confirmed, all the photos you uploaded to wikipedia are copyrighted. Kindly do not upload photos to wikipedia downloaded from internet, as they wil be deleted. Thanks. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GurugramBestSkyline.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:GurugramBestSkyline.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GoddessDurga.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:GoddessDurga.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Halfshivpic.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Halfshivpic.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BrahmaNewPic.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:BrahmaNewPic.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Hinduism. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Also please don't add unsourced content. That constitutes WP:OR. Provide WP:RS for anything you want to add. Tyler Durden (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your addition to Mumbai has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dr. K. 04:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hinduism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Hinduism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 11:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

DS-alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Editing guidelines

Hi Anmolbhat. Please make sure that you're aware of our policies as you edit here. In particular, you may want to review WP:V, WP:RS and WP:CONSENSUS. In a nutshell, everything you add should be verifiable from a reliable source and, if reverted, you should seek consensus before attempting to re-add that content. Since you appear to be adding large quotations, you should also review WP:QUOTEFARM and WP:LONGQUOTE. Generally, it is better to use your own words than to convey information through long quotes. Best wishes. --regentspark (comment) 19:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Your addition to Hindu cosmology has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

This is your second notice for violation here, after you received a caution from another editor on 14 June 2017. Please do not repeatedly violate copyright policy of wikipedia. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 01:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Your addition to Jammu & Kashmir Bank has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Text from fake news site

Hello. The text that you have reinstated is referenced from a fake news site. Can you provide the authentic source? Edwige9 (talk) 18:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

It is not a fake news site. Just because a few left-wing commentators call it fake, it doesn't become fake. If you would have spent a few minutes reading the content of the article, you'd have known that there was nothing 'fake' about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indian ai (talk • contribs) 13:09, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jammu. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

@Arjayay: My point is if Demographics are to be mentioned then why not to be mentioned right from Indus Valley Civilisation. Why are only Muslims mentioned if Hindus too are killed in past Islamic Invasions.Are people only killed in 1947 in Jammu???. Isn't it violation of NPOV Anmolbhat (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

The way to improve any article is to add sourced material, to ensure there is a WP:NPOV not delete sourced material. You deleted a specific section on "Muslim Communities", so it is not surprising that it concentrated on Muslims. Given the importance of the 1947 Jammu massacres to the recent history of Jammu, and the effect on the demographics, it must be included in the article, whereas you totally removed every mention of the massacres from the entire article. By linking to the article on the 1947 Jammu massacres, and giving a brief summary, the section does not over-emphasise the importance, but does not whitewash it from the history either. - Arjayay (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Culture and music of Kashmir

Thank you for your note. As part of maintaining a neutral point of view, we treat each country's controlled zone as belonging to it: our Jammu and Kashmir article covers just the Indian side of the Line of Control, and our Azad Kashmir article just the Pakistani side. For that reason, these moves wouldn't be a good idea — they cover the entire region, both the Indian-controlled areas and the Pakistani-controlled areas. The effect of renaming would be to restrict each article's scope to one side or the other (in which case we ought to have two articles, versus having one right now) or to privilege one side over the other, and I don't suppose you'd prefer to see an article entitled "Culture of Azad Kashmir" that covers Srinagar, for example. Nyttend (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Seeing that Urdu is a scheduled language of the Union, and seeing that it's used a good deal in Kashmir, please do not remove it. Nyttend (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

@Nyttend: Sanskrit is also a schedule language of India. Then for sake of NPOV we should add Sanskrit too. Anmolbhat (talk) 05:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The difference being that it is not used extensively in Kashmir. Nyttend (talk) 06:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

@Nyttend: But things like music , art , culture are from Hindus which have history of over 5000 years in Kashmir and still is. So mentioning of Sanskrit name is also important.Anmolbhat (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

If I'm wrong in saying it is not used extensively there, feel free to add it. An article should have the English name of its subject, plus the subject's name in any other language that's highly important to the subject. Nyttend (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

• FYI, I removed it because it goes against our indic script policy. --regentspark (comment) 13:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!!! Anmolbhat (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

KSHMR

Please stop this vandalism Amy wamey (talk) 22:19, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

@Amy wamey: Hey!! . I wanted to know that there is a difference between co producer and Ghost Producer. Niles ghost produced for those Producers that's why co production is not the right term. Anmolbhat (talk) 08:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

about Shownu

Hi and about Shownu the first thing that i wanna say you is thank for your advice and your edit I can understand your intention and I'll say you that this article is just a translate so if any part isn't relevant is not my fault i just did translate but is the same info that have others wikis. I hope others users could help. well its all for now. Lilian89 (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the info. Anmolbhat (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus

Hi Anmolbhat, I suggest that you copy your contribution to your sandbox and clean it up. The rest of us can help too as needed. All citations should have author, publication and date included. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: Here's the link [1]

Hi dear

thank for your help, and dont worry about the other article, now i know their reason to deleted. I guess that i must have been waited to collaborate in wikipedia. I'll learn more. So thank and bye for now. Have a nice day. Lilian89 (talk) 10:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Have a great time dear. Anmolbhat (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

==Notice== There is a complaint concerning your behavior at Arbitration. Dilpa kaur (talk) 06:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Access to source material

Hi, Anmolbhat! Please note that "source not working" is not a valid reason to remove a reference, without thorough inquiry and or discussion. See information at Wikipedia:Link rot and WP:SOURCEACCESS. Although it's unlikely that a URL would be broken just after it is added to an article, "verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online." Rhinopias (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the information!!!! Anmolbhat (talk) 08:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Please be careful with reverts

When you revert edits, like this, you need to always explain your reasons, preferably backed by Wikipedia policies. Secondly, when content is deleted for being unsourced, you can reinstate it only along with a realiable source. When you reinstate it, the responsibility for the content becomes yours, no matter who wrote it originally. So there are many tricky issues here. Please be careful with reverts. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. Anmolbhat (talk) 12:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Aggressive and threatening message

I’ve left a complaint here regarding the unjustified accusations you made against me, as well as the threats you made. Willard84 (talk) 06:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Correction: this is the pageWillard84 (talk) 07:19, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Padmavati

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Padmaavat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0: Wait what when did I blanked Padmavati page?? Anmolbhat (talk) 11:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

You removed content that summarised the film’s controversy in the lead. Please be careful with your edits. Thank you. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0: I am sorry but you are being a little biased there and engaging in WP:OR. You have linked the word right wing with Saffron terror. Opposition from Rashtriya Janta Dal, Muslims protests, INC of Rajasthan, etc. are way more than just what you are frequently adding [2] despite the continuous removal of your WP:OR.[3] Anmolbhat (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Look at what the refs say. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Moved to talk page,[4] where it belongs, for wider output. Anmolbhat (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Given my response for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Kashmiri History

Hey, I have given my response why I don't think the page you nominated for deletion should be deleted. But well, lets see what happens. No hard feelings and stay happy and be true to the spirit of Wikipedia. - https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lost_Kashmiri_History - Cheers :) DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks let's see what happens Anmolbhat (talk) 04:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Punjabi wedding songs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Punjabi wedding songs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

That DAB made near-zero sense.~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

@Winged Blades of Godric: Doesnt require sources because its a dab. I just wanted to fix the redirect somehow because the redirect was nothing but a POV. Redirect seems to have been deleted, can you get this draftspace deleted too? Anmolbhat (talk) 12:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Yeah! The draftification message is a boiler-plate and doesn't speak much sense as to this very case.Anyways, I have moved the nonsense DAB, suppressing the redirect and don't have any problems in storing that in draft-space.And, the script seemed to have erred for otherwise it should have fired this to PHighway's t/p.~ Winged Blades^Godric 12:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Warning

Your recent editing history at Anti-Hindu sentiment shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
First, you reverted without giving any reason. Second time you reverted again by giving a vague reasom. You are not onl engaging in disruptive editing, but also indulging in copyrights violation by adding content without paraphrasing.

Do you even understand what is an "edit war"? The first IP who removed the content[5] is a sock of Mfarazbaig.[6] Second revert was made on totally unrelated content[7], and third revert was made to revert your disruptive WikiHounding.[8] I didn't added anything "without paraphrasing". Kindly don't abuse the warning templates for issuing frivolous warnings. Anmolbhat (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

This is the second time that you are indulging in personal attacks. Please avoid them. See WP:CIVIL. You have reverted twice, the same content, first,without specifying any reason and then without replying to the 3 objections raised by me in the edit summary. Not only are to edit waring but also engaging in WP:COPYVIO as the content you adding (and now denying to add) is a WP:COPYPASTE. @NeilN: can I have some guidance on the copy/paste text being added to the article? Thanks.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ^ʞlɐʇ 16:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

There is no personal attack, I made only 1 revert which is clearly not edit warring, nor there is any violation of copyright. Anmolbhat (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

BTW, how are you too sure that the IP is Mfarazbaig's sock? and if you are too sure, why doesn't you file the SPI? Youbare casting WP:ASPERSIONS on the IP. Lastly, the text is copyVio has it has been exactly copied from the source.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ^ʞlɐʇ 17:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Link me to a copyright tool if you can and show the evidence that there is copyright violation because until now your claims are still frivolous and you don't understand what is a WP:COPYRIGHT. Yes the IP belongs to Mfarazbaig, since it's a dynamic IP and has been probably changed by now, there's no reason to report him unless it gets out of control. Read the SPI archives that I have linked. Anmolbhat (talk) 17:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Prabhloch Singh

Hi Anmol, appreciate your notification of canvassing. Kindly accept my sincere apologies. It wasn't intentional. I'll take it as a learning for future. It would be great if you could go through the references given below the article and let me know your views about the credibility of the sources? Thank you.ThisMr (talk) 17:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)