Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

edit
 

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox US political party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

.

edit
 
Hello, Kautilya3. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ophiophagus hannah Cobra (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit Request for Audrey truschke

edit

Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in.

https://scroll.in/article/856178/aurangzeb-was-a-bigot-not-just-by-our-standards-but-by-those-of-his-predecessors-and-peers

I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... Ker3243 (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? Virabukkaraya (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello Virabukkaraya, welcome to Wikipedia! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Wikipedia. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I am just unaware as to how a new section can be created. Virabukkaraya (talk) 17:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Season's Greetings

edit
  Season's Greetings

When he took up his hat to go, he gave one long look round the library. Then he turned ... (and Saxon took advantage of this to wag his way in and join the party), and said, "It's a rare privilege, the free entry of a book chamber like this. I'm hoping ... that you are not insensible of it."

(Text on page 17 illustrated in the frontispiece in Juliana Horatia Ewing's Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers, illustrated by Mary Wheelhouse, London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.)

Fowler&fowler«Talk» 04:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Fowler&fowler. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays!

edit
  Happy holidays!
Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Jannatulbaqi. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Have a look

edit

Have a look at these changes. Seems POV. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it is WP:OR and a pretty poor one too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Have a look at these changes. Apparently, the user is making a lot of POV changes as of late. I was notified that it is an SP. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Regarding a concern

edit

As I see, there is an edit war going on with few pages, I wanted some help in regards to that. Virabukkaraya (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

If your edits have been reverted, you should go to the article's talk page and write a message querying it. The people that revert edits are expected to explain their reasons.
If they were not your edits, as a new user, you can stay away from the edit wars. Somebody more experienced will deal with them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. Virabukkaraya (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome to make edits to the parts of the page that are not under dispute. Regarding the disputed parts, you can write your comments on the article's talk page, if you can contribute to those aspects.
In any case, which page is it that you are talking about? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu Virabukkaraya (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Its mostly the Raja being switched with Zamindar / King back and forth, I am writing notes with sources to start writing for many things including this, I shall re write the entire thing, but I would request you to somehow get it locked so people don't use it for the own purposes. Virabukkaraya (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your message

edit

Yes, that sock is WP:DUCK. Chaipau (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply