Your submission at Articles for creation: Adasinskiy, Anton Alexandrovich (March 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, MakhinaDzhu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Adasinsky (September 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waddie96 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{u|waddie96}} {talk} 10:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Anton Adasinsky concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anton Adasinsky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Anton Adasinsky concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anton Adasinsky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Anton Adasinsky

edit
 

Hello, MakhinaDzhu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anton Adasinsky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi MakhinaDzhu! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, my draft that I've been working on for 2 months has been deleted., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi MakhinaDzhu! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, missing information, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Adasinsky (January 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kieran207 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kieran207 talk 22:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Anton Adasinsky.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Anton Adasinsky.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Adasinsky (July 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Adasinsky (August 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Adasinsky (December 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 03:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think it's rather unprofessional to write such a comment "bloated promotional piece". Don't you find it disrespectful? MakhinaDzhu (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Adasinsky (June 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Adasinsky (November 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Justlettersandnumbers were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Adasinsky (April 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Xkalponik was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: One purpose account. 8 previous declines. Still doesn't show how the subject qualifies for an article. Even ignoring the writing issues (there are a lot), the subject does not seem to meet any notability guidelines. I can see the subject having cross-wiki pages in foreign languages, but that could be a part of a paid/cross-wiki promo. Judging the references of this draft, hardly any of them talk about the subject in depth, most are just mere passing and trivial mentions. They haven't also received any major award that would automatically make them notable according to our guidelines. A lot of the sections are uncited, despite multiple suggestions/warnings, they haven't been addressed. A reject was imminent here.
X (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Anton Adasinsky

edit
 

Hello, MakhinaDzhu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Anton Adasinsky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply