Welcome!

Hello, Leader Vladimir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Moving Kara Zor-El

edit

These pages have been moved back since your changes do not conform to Comics naming conventions. CovenantD 18:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edit to Hugh Jackman was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:18, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to Jack Bauer

edit

Your recent edit to Jack Bauer was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 03:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Machinima

edit

Hi Vladimir,

I noticed that you have an interest in articles related to Red vs Blue. If you weren't aware, a group called WikiProject Machinima was formed to improve Wikipedia's coverage of machinima, including Red vs Blue. If you'd like to join us, there are details on the project page. — TKD::Talk 16:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio

edit

Your recent edit to Sydney Bristow was reverted. It is a violation of copyright to add a copyrighted image to an article without providing a detailed fair-use rationale. --Yamla 00:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Smile

edit

Redirect of SMBZ

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on SMBZ, by Closedmouth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because SMBZ is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting SMBZ, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of S.P.D. Red Ranger

edit
 

A tag has been placed on S.P.D. Red Ranger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 00:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Fictional history of Superman

edit

I have nominated Fictional history of Superman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional history of Superman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cameron Scott (talk) 19:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

For what it's worth, the article is amazing, in how comprehensive and detailed it is. -Sharp962 (talk) 02:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC).Reply


Proposed deletion of X-Men: Nation X

edit
 

The article X-Men: Nation X has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've noted your removal above the above-noted prod tag with the edit summary "Nation X will be published after Utopia. Go to Marvel.com for info." Well, that's the point -- the article needs citations like the exact point in marvel.com where that information could be found. At present, there is not enough information for anyone to know what the article is saying unless they already know what it means -- which is tautological -- and I was also suggesting that reliable sources should be added so that we would have some indication that this was going to happen other than your own assertion. I thought you would like the opportunity to bring this into agreement with the basic principles of all Wikipedia articles, seeing as how I observe you've been working here long enough to know what they are, but if you'd prefer that I proposed some other solution, that's up to you. If I can be of any assistance with explaining the relevant policies or anything else, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

I have removed the plot sections you added to Superman: World of New Krypton and Superman: Secret Origin. These sections were copied ver batim from supermanhomepage.com. Please note that copyright violations are a serious violation of Wikipedia policy. Further copyright violations from your account will result in your being blocked from editing. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tucker (Red vs. Blue)

edit
 

The article Tucker (Red vs. Blue) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Fictional history of Spider-Man

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Fictional history of Spider-Man. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional history of Spider-Man (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fictional history of Spider-Man

edit

There is a discussion now about an article you are one of the major contributors too. Talk:Fictional_history_of_Spider-Man#Rewrite_and_replacement It concerns replacing the entire article with something fairly unrelated. Dream Focus 10:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi this is Eliab, um so I kinda noticed that one of Marvel superhero Spider-Man's abilities in the infobox, martial arts is deleted, but according to Spider-Man's powers and abilities, he is said to be honed in martial arts by using his spider powers due his years of fighting crime, and there's the evidence that after Spider-Man is self-taught in martial art moves that are reliable to his powers, next; there's the evidence that he was trained by Captain America and Shang-Chi, a two martial art superhero experts, so why revert like "Master martial artist and hand-to-hand combatant" in the infobox in Spider-Man? 9:17 p.m. (talk)24 August 2021

Power Rangers categories

edit

Because not every Red Ranger ever has wielded a sword, it does not make sense to include all of them as sword fighters. That and if we allow the use of those crazy "Fictional _______" categories, it floods the page and fills it full of unnecessary categories. It's better to just say the are only Power Rangers characters.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Spider-Man

edit

Thanks for your contributions to the article but would you mind sourcing it with a citation please. I am trying to get everything sourced on there. You will also notice hidden texts near where you have written if those can be sourced they don't have to be hidden anymore too. Jhenderson 777

Hey can you reverted back his "Master martial artist" and add "hand-to-hand combat" because there's the evidence that after Spider-Man is self-taught in martial art moves that are reliable to his powers during his years of crime-fighting in his own time, he then later was trained by Captain America and Shang-Chi, a two martial art superhero experts, so why revert like "Master martial artist and hand-to-hand combatant" in the infobox in Spider-Man? 9:17 p.m. (talk)24 August 2021

Sourcing Batman

edit

I saw one of the edit summaries of your work on the Batman article mention that you might need help with references. I don't edit a lot of comic-based articles, but when I chased up some of the references in the Arkham Asylum article, I found this website to be very useful in finding all the information I needed to make full citations. If you're citing comic issues or graphic novels, then {{Cite comic}} and plus the information you can find on that site should be of some use to you. Hope it helps. GRAPPLE X 23:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your content

edit

You need to have a think about how you are adding content to articles, pretty much all of your edits are writing about fictional objects and characters as if they are real. Please read the MOS, you should write about things from a real world perspective not as if any of this stuff is real or actually happened. --Cameron Scott (talk) 11:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ends of the Earth

edit

Hey Vlad, thanks for your help with the Ends of the Earth (Marvel Comics) article. I'm glad you suggested starting this article, but Green-Halcyon seems to be on a mission to make sure the article is deleted, so I would appreciate it if you could help expand the article more if possible. Reliable outside sources as references are what would help the article most. Thank you. Spidey104 15:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited H'El on Earth, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Johnson and Crossover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Kendrick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeremy Jordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Omega Prime for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omega Prime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Prime until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lois Lane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013 GA Thanks

edit
 This user has contributed to Man of Steel (film) good articles on Wikipedia.

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I thank you for your editorial contributions to Man of Steel (film), which recently was promoted to WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Superman: Doomed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Suggested topic area

edit

Hi Leader Vladimir,

Welcome! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your great edits related to our project WikiProject Video games. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!

  • You will see a list of articles that need most improvement.
  • You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
  • Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Video games, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Video games!

Feel free to contact me at my talk page if you have any questions. Hope you will have fun here, and let us know if you need any help! -Thibbs (talk) 04:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Leader Vladimir. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seven Mortal Sins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reboot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dragon Lineage listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dragon Lineage. Since you had some involvement with the Dragon Lineage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 15:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hey there, a few years back you were on Talk:Link (The Legend of Zelda) discussing his character image. Unfortunately that image is now outdated due to not including his Breath of the Wild design, plus there's the fact that Zelda and Ganondorf's articles use their Smash incarnations rather than any kind of collage, so updating Link likewise (while including the collage to display his other incarnations) makes the most sense. If possible, could you please join the discussion on the page? Thanks! Buh6173 (talk) 20:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Leader Vladimir. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blue lantern

edit

Superman and lois is blue lantern Mohamadwolf (talk) 06:32, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Check your DC history before jumping into conclusions. Leader Vladimir (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Antagonist"

edit

"An antagonist is a character in a story who is presented as the chief foe of the protagonist." - this is the cited definition in the linked article, so "primary antagonist" is a tautology. Think about it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A story can have several antagonist, like Lord of the Rings itself does. The protagonists face many antagonists throughout the story (Saruman, the Balrog, Shelob, etc.) but Sauron is the primary threat they must defeat, thus the term "primary antagonist." Leader Vladimir (talk) 13:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hal Jordan

edit

I've commented at the Talk page for the article and noted that both you and the IP you're in a dispute with are edit-warring at this point. Please do not continue to do so. DonIago (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Renaming alternate film/TV versions of Superman

edit

Hi Leader Vladimir,

I come in peace. Just wanna explain the way I see things, especially on why some of these articles are named as such. Even though Clark Kent/Kal-El is widely known as Superman, the films in the DCEU and TV franchises such as the Arrowverse and Smallville focus more on portraying Clark Kent as a person first, who happens to have superpowers and go by the nickname "Superman". The DCEU so far has focused on how Clark Kent battled his inner demons before and while acting as Superman in the public (even if you disagree with how Zack Snyder has portrayed that so far lol) and in the Arrowverse show, especially Superman & Lois, that version of Clark has to deal with his own family in addition to acting as Superman. Smallville even focuses on Clark as a teen, before he became Superman.

The Donnerverse/1980s version of Superman might be an exception to this, as those films simply portray him first as Superman. But that's just how I see it. Feel free to disagree with me, but we'll see what the other users say on the DCEU and Arrowverse iterations of Superman.

Also, if you change the Superman articles, you may need to also change every other page about cinematic versions of superheroes such as Diana Prince/Wonder Woman, all versions of Batman (Burton/Schumacher series, Dark Knight trilogy, and DCEU, aka "Batfleck"), all versions of Spider-Man (Tobey Maguire's version, Andrew Garfield's version and Tom Holland in the MCU), Tony Stark / Iron Man, etc. just to maintain consistency across Wikipedia.

Just my two cents, but I'm open to hearing any counter points.

Cheers --WuTang94 (talk) 07:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Batman 5" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Batman 5 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 22#Batman 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MightyArms (talk) 00:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Yeah, THIS is why I don't trust edits by unregistered users."

edit

Kindly stop putting that in your edit summaries. You are biting IP users and discouraging readers from contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for coming off like an asshole, but I don't like how unregistered users vandalize articles because they're trying come off as witty or clever, but in the end they just come off as rude and they often try to editorialize their own opinions.
I have nothing but respect towards the hard-working, fair-minded people who do their best to keep Wikipedia updated and accessible. Leader Vladimir (talk) 06:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
I see where you're coming from; I come across IP vandalism all the time. But some edits, such as this one, are not necessarily vandalism (see WP:NOTVAND), and it would be far more helpful to fellow editors if your edit summaries were more descriptive, such as Unexplained content removal, or DUPLINK, etc. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Understood. Still, I don't understand what was the point of adding a link to a non-existent page. Leader Vladimir (talk) 07:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for clarifying. This is why it would have been more helpful to onlookers if you had written links to non-existent page in your edit summary instead of Yeah, THIS is why I don't trust edits by unregistered users.. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply