Kabahaly

Welcome

Hello, Kabahaly, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! AnupMehra ✈ 16:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Kabahaly, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Kabahaly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm UY Scuti. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Kogalymavia Flight 9268— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Hermionedidallthework. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Barbara L, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 19:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Zyablikovo District. Thank you. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

St. Mary’s Church, Negombo

Please see if the c/e is adequate or let me know where else to chnage--Nvvchar. 13:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Jacob Olie

Hi I removed a strange template you left on this page. Please be careful when reviewing new articles. Thanks. Jane (talk) 13:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, My intention wasn't to promote a product, but I had to enter links in the references. Please specifically indicate which sentences to be deleted. Antonyroman

Not really advertisement, just not a neutral point of view. This sentence "Today he is known for his unusually sharp depictions of various parts of Amsterdam that no longer exist." Kabahaly (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Ha! I am not Antonyroman, so I didn't put that there (and the Jacob Olie page is not a product). The photographer made unusually sharp photographs, and the places he photographed no longer exist. Is there something wrong with how I worded it that you see multiple issues? I am not sure how else to put it. He was not known for his photography during his lifetime, but becamse known for the nostalgic value of his photos. Maybe if you state your issues it would be clearer to me, because I don't see anything wrong with that sentence. Jane (talk) 18:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

poor grammar?

You have twice tagged Star of Devon for poor grammar, but I can't see any problem at all can you enlighten me?Theroadislong (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

I've added two commas, and possibly there could be two more (around 'Devon'). It did work as it was, but I'm a stickler for commas. Peridon (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism?

I can't see Oana Stoica Mujea as vandalism. Possibly promotional or not notable, as the title has been deleted on the Romanian Wikipedia twice (once each for those reasons so far as I can see), but not vandalism. It is in Romanian, not English, but we list articles in other languages at WP:PNT (unless we can see a clear problem that requires speedy deletion). You might see something there that I don't - if you have information about something that anyone else might not, or if there might be a language problem hiding something, please put a note on the talk page to explain this. It makes our lives easier... Peridon (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Help needed at DRN

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

DRN help needed and volunteer roll call

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Political Compass (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Political Compass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The International 2016 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The International 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

My page on Sarah Bellamy who travelled with the First Fleet to colonise Australia had not been finished — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halljo22 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Doggy style, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rhett and Link. Binksternet (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

G2

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Userspace is exempt from G2 speedy deletes. Users are permitted to do tests in their own sandboxes. If it is your own test, you can use CSD-G7 to ask for delete, or if someone else tested in you userspace you can use CSD-U1. Also if someone independent declines your speedy delete nomination do not put it back on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Black supremacy

I sincerely hope you don't go around Wikipedia making stuff up like you did at Black supremacy. Try it again and you'll be reported at WP:AN/I. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 13:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

ElectroYoga

Why would you remove ElectroYoga? It's a real word that is developing. If you don't like the links that were provided we could just remove them. I need to site examples of where the word was used to substantiate that it is a real word that is now being used. I am perfectly happy to leave out the examples of the word being used. However the word electroyoga is used to describe a public event. Magenta1984 (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)magenta1984

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for reviewing pages on India. Regards, Prof TPMS (talk) 10:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of /r/The Donald

The article /r/The Donald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I doubt this warrants having its own article at this point, and from what I can see, we don't even know for sure if Donald Trump is really involved or it's just satire.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of /r/The Donald for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article /r/The Donald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//r/The Donald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lockhart, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxwell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

Hi!

Hate to bother you, but is there any way you could let me know how the Operation Infinite Reach GA review is going? Some of the news sources may be difficult to find, in which case I can easily email them to you or something. I'm only saying this because I will have a hard time getting online next week.

Best,

GAB^gab 16:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

Just wanted to ask if you were still intending to do the GA review. If not, I fully understand, but I would appreciate knowing either way.

Thanks,

GAB^gab 22:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you and help defend me

Please add to my defence https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jeneral28#Suspected_sockpuppets. Have I not been a great contributor to many defence articles especially to [Mechanised Infantry Vehicle]]? Thanks Cantab1985 (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MacGyver_the_Lizard

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MacGyver_the_Lizard . Lizzymartin (talk) 01:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Hello, I'm Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Discord (software) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You seem to have been an editor for some time, so I'm a little surprised to see unsourced apparent vandalism like this... -- ferret (talk) 14:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Kenneth Bone

For now, I'll do you a favor: I won't seek redress for your insulting, completely false claim that I vandalized that article. In return, would you please respond to the edit summary I left? I said, "This wasn't vandalism by a long shot. And what about the text you put in quotation marks even though it wasn't a direct quote?" Now that you've finally read it, you probably see the mistakes you made. If you revert me again, use a far, far better explanation than "Removing vandalism" because we don't like when people lie. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 19:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

While I don't see your apology for your lie that I perpetrated vandalism, I appreciate that you seem to be working on less dishonest edit summaries. Of course, you're still putting unsourced text in quotation marks and removing text someone copied straight out of the New York Times by falsely calling it "unprofessional writing." (I assure you, the Times pays writers.) Am I going to have to go through every policy violation you commit one by one? Or can you just stop? RunnyAmiga ※ talk 19:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Political Compass

Hello, Kabahaly. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Political Compass".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deadspin. Woodroar (talk) 23:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Aspects. Aspects (talk) 07:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Space Station 13. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kabahaly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Al-Afaq International School

The article Al-Afaq International School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joy Awards (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joy Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Joy Awards

Hello, Kabahaly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joy Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changes (song) (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Changes (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)