User talk:Hako9/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Hako9. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Azov Battalion
I have started a discussion in which you may care to comment at [[1]] Cheers Elinruby (talk) 00:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. BSMRD (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)}}
chris rock image
Hello. the page is to show the viewer image of what happened during the image. Instead of googling the image, its in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSecondComing10 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- @TheSecondComing10: You aren't supposed to remove the old prod template from the talk page, if the prod is removed. - hako9 (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- The deletion did not make any sense, so i closed it down as of Speedy Keep. TheSecondComing10 (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Knowing
Why an article is gonna to be deleted. How can I edit that to avoid deletation.. জাবিরটটক (talk) 07:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- @জাবিরটটক The best way to avoid deletion would be to provide mainstream reliable sources and/or scholarly sources either in the article or on the deletion discussion page here. Please also read WP:AFDEQ and WP:AFDFORMAT if you want to comment on the deletion discussion page. - hako9 (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello admin,
I have revised Draft:Meesho and removed the poor references you suggested. Meesho is a well known brand in India and competes against Amazon and Flipkart. There are hundreds of references available about it but I have tried to narrow them down. Please have a look at the draft and accept it if it's good enough. Everbethesame (talk) 11:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please read WP:CORPDEPTH, especially the sections "Numerical facts", "Significant coverage of the company itself" and "Examples of trivial coverage". The article reads like pitch deck. There are indeed a tonne of reliable sources, but there's very little in those sources that can be included in the article. Routine news like capital raises, company announcements and pretty much anything that company insiders say about the company, which is directly quoted by the publisher, shouldn't be included, unless there's a good reason to do so. Few tips; focus on quality over quantity. See WP:REFBOMB. Almost all of the 40 sources are routine coverage. Exclude all trivial achievements and capital raises, or maybe condense them into a single line with few prominent funders. — hako9 (talk) 20:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
|
A cup of tea for you, I wish they had a better milky tea as well in the drop down but there was none and I dont want to make my own, I am having flatulence issues and I just wanted to thank for the last message you dropped. (talk) 14:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC) |
- Ingesting too much conspiracy can cause excessive flatulence. — hako9 (talk) 03:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)