User talk:Gobonobo/Archive 50
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Gobonobo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | → | Archive 55 |
Orphaned non-free image File:Chris Farley.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chris Farley (American actor-comedian).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Vbc7logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Vbc7logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ben Shahn artist.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ben Shahn artist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Five years! |
---|
April 2020 at Women in Red
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:James Larkin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:James Larkin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Orphaned non-free image File:Global Strategy Group logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Global Strategy Group logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Midwest Living magazine cover.png
Thanks for uploading File:Midwest Living magazine cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Clarence Hailey Long.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Clarence Hailey Long.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Hi there! First of all, I'd like to thank you for your amazing work. I'm currently researching feminist/women wikiprojects and the gender gap in Wikipedia from a Brazilian perspective. I can see there isn't much content like this in Portuguese, like "women artists, writers or scientists". Other lists like "Brazilian athletes" show a lot o male footballers even though our greatest footballer of all time is female. I want to become an editor to work on two fronts: translating content from Portuguese to English, to improve the visibility of Brazilian women and adding/expanding Brazilian female biographies in both languages.
Thanks again for your work and for helping inspiring people to do the same. Best wishes! melisemp Melisemp (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:The Bride Price (Buchi Emecheta novel).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Bride Price (Buchi Emecheta novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:No Longer Human (Osamu Dazai novel) cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:No Longer Human (Osamu Dazai novel) cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Shi Shi giant panda.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shi Shi giant panda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Commentary magazine cover.png
Thanks for uploading File:Commentary magazine cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Delmore Schwartz.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Delmore Schwartz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
Issue 38, January – April 2020
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
- New partnership
- Global roundup
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Disambiguation link notification for May 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 100 (emergency telephone number), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Credit union1.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Credit union1.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Del-one logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Del-one logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ITN recognition for Death of George Floyd
On 28 May 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Death of George Floyd, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — RealFakeKimT 09:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
A question about an edit you made to "Glutamate Flavouring"
Dear Gobonobo, I'm a science journalist from Israel and my attention was drawn to an addition that was added to the "Glutamte Flavouring" article (not by you): " It is often the subject of controversy due to multiple online rumours spread around Israel in 2011 but these are false." Since I couldn't find any indications of such rumors, I wrote about my confusion in the talk page and saw you deleted that addition. I'm not so familiar with wikipedia, and therefore am fascinated in knowing a bit more about this situation - why do you think such an addition was made and why did you decide to delete it? If I could understand the logic of it a bit more, that could be great. Thank you very much. YouKnowTwo YouKnowTwo (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi YouKnowTwo, I replied over on the glutamate flavouring talk page. gobonobo + c 15:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
- CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
- Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Orphaned non-free image File:Gilles Andruet.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gilles Andruet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
"Umop apisdn" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Umop apisdn. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 8#Umop apisdn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg • alt account of pandakekok9 02:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
- Library Card Platform
- New partnerships
- ProQuest
- Springer Nature
- BioOne
- CEEOL
- IWA Publishing
- ICE Publishing
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ruth Hall (Fanny Fern novel) cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ruth Hall (Fanny Fern novel) cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
January 2020 at Women in Red
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
June 2020
Your addition to 2020 Boogaloo killings has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry Diannaa. I resurrected the article from AfD and didn't see that. That entire hidden section could be deleted anyway. gobonobo + c 11:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Porter Novelli
Hi! I'd like to respectfully request that you undo the addition of Arabella Advisors to the list of clients noted in Porter Novelli. The source cited does not support that statement, nor is it accurate. Thanks! Mary Gaulke (talk) 20:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Mary. I was pretty tired when I added that. I can't see the article from this computer, but I thought the source said Arabella was one of their clients. gobonobo + c 04:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- The source implied it, but the article has since been updated to clarify. Happy to provide a PDF if you'd like to verify, or I believe the portion of the article before the paywall cutoff now makes it clear. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 19:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oh that's good. It did seem like the article's lede had changed. gobonobo + c 09:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Is that sufficient for you to undo your edit to Porter Novelli? Or I can handle it if you prefer. Mary Gaulke (talk) 22:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oh wow. You *work* for Porter Novelli? I've copied this convo over to Talk:Porter Novelli. gobonobo + c 11:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Is that sufficient for you to undo your edit to Porter Novelli? Or I can handle it if you prefer. Mary Gaulke (talk) 22:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oh that's good. It did seem like the article's lede had changed. gobonobo + c 09:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- The source implied it, but the article has since been updated to clarify. Happy to provide a PDF if you'd like to verify, or I believe the portion of the article before the paywall cutoff now makes it clear. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 19:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Artforum (magazine) April 1996 cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Artforum (magazine) April 1996 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Captain Ellen Church.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Captain Ellen Church.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chan Parker.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chan Parker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
so like yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:545:8080:26B0:8DE:A752:3D58:CE53 (talk) 03:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mapframe maps in infoboxes on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Artforum (magazine) April 1996 cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Artforum (magazine) April 1996 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Regarding User:Taliarycroft
Hello, Gobonobo. I have contacted you due to my concerns about the user as you have given them a warning on their talk page over the Simon Cowell edits. Please note that these are likely not be in order, but I will try to keep them in order and will list the edit number to help. They asked an uninvolved user to revert edits made by another user, claiming that they were wrong. (Special:Diff/962840303) The uninvolved user apparently agreed as there is a section on the talk page claiming the two to have engaged in an edit war. They have repeatedly removed talk page comments on an article's talk page. (Special:Diff/962857316, Special:Diff/962857338, Special:Diff/962858378)
Additionally, there is some odd edits that warrant mention. They made a series of edits altering the year a person was born and self reverting them before settling on one not backed up by the source already on the article. (963266550: 1987 -> 1991, 963310752: Revert to 1987, 963310914: 1987 -> 1992, 963311775: Second revert back to 1987, 963312409: Reverted incorrectly to 1992) They made 19 reverts to the 19 edits made by a user three weeks prior which only changed how certain dates were grouped together. (Special:Diff/963227924 to Special:Diff/964342920) They blanked the biography of a person and replaced it with a redirect for eight minutes before self reverting. (Special:Diff/963860650)
I will say that they do make good edits at times such as Special:Diff/963566440 and Special:Diff/963567214 where they added images to Wikipedia for the use of having title cards for shows and properly tagged them as non-free along with creating (Special:Diff/963446535) and expanding (Special:Diff/963249995) articles on notable people. So, I don't believe the user is fully problematic, but they do have more concerning edits than not in my opinion. --Super Goku V (talk) 01:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Super Goku V: Some of this could be due to inexperienced editing, but I share your concerns. I'm mostly concerned about death hoaxes though. If you see that type of edit again, feel free to file a report at WP:AIV. gobonobo + c 01:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Understood as they have only been a user for about 11 days. Additionally, I must issue a correction. I thought about how odd it was that an uninvolved user got involved, so I decided to check further and found that the two users mentioned in the edit war above have interacted with each other prior to Taliarycroft's comments. (Special:Diff/954919709) This does change the meaning of that incident and I have strikethrough the text uninvolved to turn it into involved. I apologize for the earlier misleading comment. --Super Goku V (talk) 01:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Orphaned non-free image File:Shi Shi giant panda.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shi Shi giant panda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests
Template:Monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Beland (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Penn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Penn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Erasing history
Since you seem to have an interest in the Confederate statues coming down (this seems to be a common interest with chimpanzees) I was wondering if you knew what would make a good addition to the Cancel culture disambiguation page. Here is the definition I saw in today's newspaper.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Vchimpanzee: Personally, I don't think we need a disambiguation page there. The link to 2020 United States racial injustice reckoning seems particularly tenuous. I'm thinking that we should just restore the old Cancel culture article. It was merged into Online shaming. There's also a small section from the old Call-out culture article that could maybe be incorporated. A new article could still mention the "reckoning" though and have a hatnote for the tv episode if we need it. I'm sure Bacondrum will have an opinion on this as well. gobonobo + c 23:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- It's a non-event, a buzzword. This is reflected in the scant sourcing and endless POV/OR edits listing every editors favourite celebrity and how upset said editors were that their fave show was cancelled. Don't turn the disambiguation page into a POV/OR cluster. In fact, I can see no reason for a disambiguation page, it's just a tedious term. Just because some people in the US media think a term is hot right now does not make it significant in any way. Bacondrum (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- I've been editing Wikipedia for 13 years but that doesn't change the fact that if I see a concept that looks notable, I'm too quick to declare it worthy of an article or at least coverage in an existing article and I apologize for that, but I don't think George Will made up the term. But if no one can figure out why George Will used the term, then I guess nothing can be done with "cancel culture".
- It's a non-event, a buzzword. This is reflected in the scant sourcing and endless POV/OR edits listing every editors favourite celebrity and how upset said editors were that their fave show was cancelled. Don't turn the disambiguation page into a POV/OR cluster. In fact, I can see no reason for a disambiguation page, it's just a tedious term. Just because some people in the US media think a term is hot right now does not make it significant in any way. Bacondrum (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- But clearly erasing history is a concept Wikipedia should be covering. Where should Wikipedia cover it? I just added the link to 2020 United States racial injustice reckoning because it seemed to be all we had right now.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't actually do a search because i'm not used to doing that at home. Here is one source that makes clear the definition of "cancel culture" is not limited to "online shaming". Though if Bacondrum's opinion is that this is just another example of "[j]ust because some people in the US media think a term is hot right now does not make it significant in any way" then I suppose this view must be respected because it could be right.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- It appears the more I search, the more results come up that support my view. Here is another justification for my attempt to turn "Cancel culture" into a disambiguation page. This is not online shaming. Which existing Wikipedia article covers the topic? The one that is "tenuous".— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't actually do a search because i'm not used to doing that at home. Here is one source that makes clear the definition of "cancel culture" is not limited to "online shaming". Though if Bacondrum's opinion is that this is just another example of "[j]ust because some people in the US media think a term is hot right now does not make it significant in any way" then I suppose this view must be respected because it could be right.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- But clearly erasing history is a concept Wikipedia should be covering. Where should Wikipedia cover it? I just added the link to 2020 United States racial injustice reckoning because it seemed to be all we had right now.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Esther Roper.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Esther Roper.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Veterans' affairs on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for your warm welcome and the cookies! They were delicious! I'm new to Wikipedia, so I don't know if I'm doing the correct thing sending you this message. I just want to show my appreciation. And of course, thank you for the advice on writing for Wikipedia.
Janikus04 (talk) 20:50, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Janikus04. gobonobo + c 23:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)