User talk:GSK/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
![]() | This archive was created on October 16, 2011. |
Reverted Edits to PSP Homebrew section
I recently deleted a paragraph off of the PSP Homebrew section because it was a double paragraph -- that is, someone copied and pasted the same exact paragraph. If you would look at the revision history, you would see that (Compare my edit to the bots edit and look at the bottom of the page). I would like you to delete what you said on my talk page and apologize for this. 68.154.166.251 (talk) 21:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes, you did remove the double paragraph. However, you also added a URL to one of the section headers and partially screwed up the table of contents box, so I reverted it. Therefore, I will not be removing the warning on your talk page. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 21:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea what you're talking about. I didn't add anything. 68.154.166.251 (talk) 00:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes, you did. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 01:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
With all due respect, sir...
and you'll excuse me for not exactly following your rules because it's kinda confusing to try and post a message to you (IMO, take it for whatever you feel it's worth- it's not an attack), but I don't believe you've assumed good faith in my assertion regarding User:WikiLubber. There are many people around the Internet who Mr. Lubber (who also goes under the name TVLubber in various other escapades) has come across and caused trouble with. He does not contribute to anything other than to PJTP (post just to post), and whenever someone calls him on his information he whines and cries and says it's true. He has a longstanding reputation of causing trouble throughout the internet (as several users here, including myself, can attest to) and it is hard to take anything he says seriously. Further, I did not attack him, just stated what is already known. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 22:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I know what a hassle WikiLubber can be. I've crossed paths with him on more than one occasion. However, if I recall correctly, you called him a troll. Now, I guess it didn't warrant a level 3 NPA warning, but it was still a personal attack. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 00:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- I've never agreed with that assertion (calling some a troll constituting a personal attack), because to me it doesn't fit the definition. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 04:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
There is no proof that the TVLubber is me, BTW. And I do not cause that much trouble, and nor does the TVLubber. And neither of us whine or wimp out like that. We just protest. We do not cause trouble. We do the best we can to keep control and refuse to let rumors spread without reliable source. WikiLubber (talk) 00:33, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- With all due respect, Lubber, it's very hard to believe that you and "The TV Lubber" aren't one and the same. The only difference is the "TV" vs. the "Wiki". --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 04:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Believe me. You can neither deny nor confirm that we are one and the same without proof. And if you plan on apologizing to me for calling me a troll when you should not have, I'll accept it, anyway. WikiLubber (talk) 04:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- With all due respect, Lubber, it's very hard to believe that you and "The TV Lubber" aren't one and the same. The only difference is the "TV" vs. the "Wiki". --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 04:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
family guy
go to the jerky boys page (which must be correct, right?) and look up sol rosenberg (with reference to mort goldman) -- that would be a better use of your time than excising obviously correct edits. if you care about your product, you will do this. please do not respond to this -- i dont care, just thought you'd want your FG page to be good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.105.83 (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- I don't care for your tone. Furthermore, it's not my responsibility. If you add content in, you have to back it up with a source. Take a chill pill while you're at it. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 08:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Avatar link
Sorry probably I have misunderstand something. Have you check the link? The video show how the company have done the Avatar movie, tecnology, special effects etc., no easily to find with search engines. So no advertise no promotional etc.. Very sorry!!! I saw you are an UFO witness. It is true? Ciao --Abyssadventurer (talk) 08:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Generally, YouTube links shouldn't be used in Wikipedia articles, unless they're official and released by the studio. And yes, I have seen a number of UFOs and subsequently caught them on video. They are in MUFON's database as well. I'll try to find the records if you want the file numbers. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 10:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, I have insert the official Avatar youtube link. About your UFO's video I'm really interested. I'm in report with the president of UFO italian association, I like the argument so any information and link will be appreciated. Thanks --Abyssadventurer (talk) 10:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- MUFON case numbers: 19721 - 17515 - The 17515 video is available here. The bright object was originally my focus, then I spotted the shapeshifting object next to it. The MUFON investigator assigned was baffled. I will have to look on my storage drives to see if I can find the original video files for Case 19721. Hope this helps! -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 10:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism
Thanks for cleaning that up! I saw you got cussed out on your own talk page as a result. I recognize the language: see this IP. Thanks again! Drmies (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Edit War
GSK,
The page in which I was involved in an "edit war" was being changed by an anonymous user who kept removing relevant data without fully reading the contents, and ignoring the summary of why his changes were reverted in the first place. Ambaryer (talk) 13:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- I've countered this by requesting a successful page protection. However, it does not excuse you from the 3RR policy. If you revert three or more times within 24 hours, you may still be blocked, even if you were in good faith. It's not a good sight, but it happens. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 19:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2010, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Hooon
Would you mind going through his contribs to check recent edits? There appears to be a mixture of good and bad, and I don't know enough about the subject matter to tell easily. Peter 10:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Not at all. I'll compile a list of questionable edits here for reference. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 10:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
There
Hello, I apologize if I am not leaving a message correctly, I've never done it before.
I did not attempt to vandalize the There Virtual World wikipedia page. I simply said that Micheal Wilson did not state if There is to come back. Because he didn't say it was closed indefinitely. I didn't say that it was coming back, and I didn't say it will never come back.
I will not edit it anymore, as you don't want me to.
But, the currant information has no cited sources either. And I don't see how it can be confirmed as correct.
Thank you. :)
Thereisnotover (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- You did leave a message somewhat correctly. Don't forget to add a header, as I've done just above your message :)
- I personally didn't have a problem with your edits, but another user decided to voice his/her opinion, so I wanted to notify you before he did (if he ever did). You do not have to stop editing the article, but you shouldn't continue to remove others' contributions without a good and justfiable reason. Happy editing! -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 22:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism to Avatar
You warned User talk:142.68.100.129 but didn't actually revert the vandalism to Avatar. I have reverted it now. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Apologies. For some reason, the Avatar article is the only one that takes a very long time for me to load. I've had that happen in the past, but was able to still revert. Thanks for taking care of it though. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 04:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Avatar
Would it be suitable to place Avatar under the Hawaii because according to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/ It was flimed in Hawaii. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/locations ALos this is a British film as well because British film company did help in the production according to IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/company/co0136728/ Ingenious_Film_Partners so the country for the film so only be listed as US But as UK as well. Thanks! Neptunekh2 (talk) 05:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- IMDB really isn't a reasonable source since information could be added by anyone. If you can find reliable sources to backup the information, feel free to re-add it. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 06:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
The Seventh Coin
Hi! On a movie page called The Seventh Coin I need help with placing the reference tags. In other words this page is categorized Pages with missing references list. Please help! Neptunekh2 (talk) 00:34, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- It looks like it has already been fixed, but to add a references list, use the following code:
==References==<br /> <references/>
- Once saved, it will automatically add all of the references in the article that are cited using the {{cite}} and <ref></ref> tags. Additional help can be found at WP:REF. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 05:37, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Request from a friend.
GSK, this is a user from ActiveWorlds that wishes to remain anonymous for various reasons, you were a trustworthy Just Ask Me guide at AWTeen and a great editor at Wikipedia and ActiveWiki, and for that I wish to ask you if it were to be okay with it if I nominated you for adminship? Rohedin TALK 22:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- This was unexpected. Give me a couple days to think about it. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 22:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Alright. Message me on my talk page when you made your decision. Cheers, Rohedin TALK 22:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Before I consider your request, I would like to know who you are. I understand you wish to remain anonymous, so you may use Wikipedia's email tool to send me an email. This will only be valid for the next 24 hours, or until I receive your email, whichever comes first. Click here to email me. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 22:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- NetGuy. Rohedin TALK 23:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- I wanted it to be a surprise. Rohedin TALK 23:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Based on your edit patterns and "hate mail" page, I'm going to have to refuse your request to nominate me for adminship. If someone's going to nominate me, I want them to have been around Wikipedia for a long time, know its policies and guidelines, and have a good track record. Yours is questionable, to say the least. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 01:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oh well. Rohedin TALK 02:08, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Based on your edit patterns and "hate mail" page, I'm going to have to refuse your request to nominate me for adminship. If someone's going to nominate me, I want them to have been around Wikipedia for a long time, know its policies and guidelines, and have a good track record. Yours is questionable, to say the least. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 01:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- I wanted it to be a surprise. Rohedin TALK 23:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- NetGuy. Rohedin TALK 23:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
PROD of Disney California Adventure
Hi GSK, I removed your PROD from this page because redirects cannot be PRODded. If you think another page should be moved over it and can't do it yourself, I suggest listing it at WP:Requested moves. For uncontroversial moves, the redirect at the intended destination can also be tagged for speedy deletion with the template {{db-move|page to be moved here|reason for move}}
. Thanks -- Glenfarclas (talk) 08:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
you're right
I should have sources, I just know about the 3DS, I think pretty much all avid gamers do, and Sony did recently register the trademark of "PlayStation Cloud".--FifthCylon (talk) 01:18, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
My references on The Seventh Coin movie page
Hi GSk. Would you mind cleaning my references on The Seventh Coin movie page? Could you help to see which references should go under production and which references should under Reception? I have the references of production and Reception mixed up thanks! Neptunekh2 (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Please listen.
Sooner or later, your going to get yourself bitten in the ass because you stick you nose where it doesn't belong. The clan didn't do anything to you, you shouldn't being doing anything to me or our members. I didn't want to become a member in the first place, but I had no choice or my builds would have been destroyed by them. Sammy the Seeker (talk) 00:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Is that a threat? -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 00:30, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Besides, you've been causing trouble independently for a very long time. Why not at least attempt to turn over a new leaf? Stand up for yourself instead of being a coward and doing what you know is wrong. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 00:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't you think I do want to turn a new leaf? People on Wikipedia won't let me because they keep jacking off to policy. You nor the community will understand, you wait six months and you get that standard offer only to find out they deny your plea. I had to go through that with A1a2s and I did not know how to complete that task because I was simply inexperienced. I can't believe I am even typing this knowing that people will revert this. Tell me one thing though, how do I dig myself out of this hole? If you can help me, I will do anything to repay you. Sammy the Seeker (talk) 00:51, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- The above looks like an admission of being a sock of a blocked user to me. Yworo (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- No crap sherlock. Sammy the Seeker (talk) 00:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe you should edit in good faith. Learn policies, distance yourself from the other clan members, and prove to everyone (even those in Activeworlds) that you have changed for the better. They can't do anything to you if you don't let them. It will take time, but it's entirely possible. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 01:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- The above looks like an admission of being a sock of a blocked user to me. Yworo (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't you think I do want to turn a new leaf? People on Wikipedia won't let me because they keep jacking off to policy. You nor the community will understand, you wait six months and you get that standard offer only to find out they deny your plea. I had to go through that with A1a2s and I did not know how to complete that task because I was simply inexperienced. I can't believe I am even typing this knowing that people will revert this. Tell me one thing though, how do I dig myself out of this hole? If you can help me, I will do anything to repay you. Sammy the Seeker (talk) 00:51, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Clan? Are you telling me PBML is some dork who thinks he has to do this because he's a member of some stupid WoW or other online clan/guild and they make him do it? That has to be the most retarded thing I've ever heard. No offense. PBML, let us know when you're not such a wussy that you let fake clans and the internet rule your life, then maybe we'll let you edit. Burpelson AFB (talk) 02:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Just seems like a fancy way of saying "The devil made me do it". Yworo (talk) 02:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- I can't decide if it's hilariously lame or just really sad. Burpelson AFB (talk) 02:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe that's what "pick both man lol" refers to. Yworo (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- LoL... oh wait, I'd better not say that! Burpelson AFB (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe that's what "pick both man lol" refers to. Yworo (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- I can't decide if it's hilariously lame or just really sad. Burpelson AFB (talk) 02:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there GSK, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:GSK/AW. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)