ForestAngel
Trigun
editPlease see the No Personal Attacks policy yet again. I happened to be the author of that section you deleted on Wolfwood and Vash's relationship. I'm not a "silly yaoi fangirl," I happen to be a man who's been in this fandom since 2003, has watched the anime, has read the manga, and happens to know what I'm talking about. Just because YOU think the idea of the couple being implied as being in love is stupid and yaoi-fangirlish doesn't mean they can't be. With lines like "I want to spend my tomorrows with him," I'd say the burden of proof is on you to show WHY they are just friends rather than delete without as much as participating on the talk page.
Needless to say, I'll be reverting your edit now.
- I put the screencap you wanted on the Trigun page if it helps you. In Defense of the Artist 04:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Editor review/Zunaid
editWith regards to your comments on Wikipedia:Editor review/Zunaid: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- ReyBrujo 14:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Blood in Zelda TP
editHi ForestAngel,
I'm not sure what the reason was for outburst on the Twilight Princess talk-page, but please be polite.
I agree that the rating is kind of stupid, since there is no (noteable) blood in Twilight Princess, but it is not our task to take sides. ESRB made that decission, stupid or not, and Wikipedia only notes that is is rated T for that reason. Any other comments on it shouldn't be on the page, and I am glad to see that they aren't.
Happy editting!
JackSparrow Ninja 02:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
bleugh bleugh!!!!! AshTM 02:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Banning spoiler warnings on the Final Fantasy Wikiproject
editHello, I've noticed that you're interested in the video game articles. You might be interested in adding your opinion to the discussion currently taking place on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Final Fantasy#Banning spoiler warnings completely. Kariteh 22:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Stemonitis 18:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Weasel words on Slipknot (band)
editI saw your weasel word tag on the Slipknot article, and I was wondering: where are these weasel words? I couldn't find them myself, and therefore removed the tag. If you could point out the weasel words, I would gladly reword. --Wildnox(talk) 02:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Double Dollars
editPlease leave the $$ sign after the numbers. In the opening sequence of the anime, the Wanted poster flashes on the screen several times. When it does so, the dollar signs are after the number. I have the boxed set of DVDs and can take a screenshot and include it in the article if that's what it takes to convince you. ++Arx Fortis 17:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- The poster you keep citing is marketing material, not the anime series itself. Show me a screen shot from the anime itself and I'd be open to discuss it further. Otherwise, I think the screen shot now shown on the article pretty much settles it. ++Arx Fortis 04:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Look...
- 1) You're taking this all WAY too seriously/personally. Your lengthy, hostile, eratic diatribes don't help your position. They simply call your rationality into question. Please lighten up.
- 2) Like I said above, if a screenshot with the format you mention can be found, it can be discussed further. The main topic of the article is the anime series itself, not the mass of English (or other language) websites that discuss or mention Trigun. You keep bringing up points that have nothing to do with the subject of the article itself.
- 3) By your logic, we should be changing "iles" to "miles" and "yarz" to "yards" because that's the way we do things in the real world. Trigun is not real-world.
- 4) Trigun is a Japanese anime with post-airing translations into several languages, of which English is only one. The actual name of the first episode is THIS...a Japanese phrase. I can't speak for the marketing department and translation/caption people who aren't consistent with the content of the series. It wouldn't be the first time a marketing department or Japanese to English translator got something wrong. (many examples)
- 5) If you can find a screenshot, great. Otherwise, I don't wish to discuss it further. ++Arx Fortis 07:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- "In your face," you say? How mature.
- I'm sure you're aware Uncyclopedia is intended as satire and, thus, is hardly a credible source. It casts doubt on the veracity of the screenshot. The DVD does not display it the way you've shown.
- From your most recent posts, it is has become very obvious that you are quite immature and cannot engage in considerate, meaningful debate. Do not engage me directly any further. Keep future debate on the article's talk page. ++Arx Fortis 15:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
I agree, mostly
editThis article really does need a rewrite. My biggest concern is that there are quotes from questionable research presented as if it is widely accepted in the scientific community. Would you like to help out in making this article more scientifically honest? Jmm6f488 07:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nomura's jellyfish.jpg)
editThanks for uploading Image:Nomura's jellyfish.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
User page
editStrike-through textWould you care to remove the mention of my name from your user page? Per WP:NPA, "comment on content, not on the contributor" and per WP:CIVIL, "Wikipedians define incivility roughly as personally targeted behavior that causes an atmosphere of greater conflict and stress. Our code of civility states plainly that people must act with civility toward one another". I'd rather you reverted yourself than I did. Thanks. Zunaid©® 09:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. I've removed my name from your user page, I hardly think striking it through does the job. Zunaid©® 10:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ffm 13:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't notice the timestamp. ffm 12:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Patron saints of occupations and activities
editPlease see Talk:Patron_saints_of_occupations_and_activities#RTFT re [1], [2], [3]. - Mdbrownmsw (talk) 15:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
your comments
editHey, calm down. I didn't type that "dealt with" comment. How should I know that he means? It was typed on my talk page by NEMT. Why don't you ask him? ++Arx Fortis (talk) 15:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Trigun article
editI began a discussion here concerning the categories. I hope we can settle this. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 08:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
test
editWelcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Characters of Final Fantasy XII worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Blue。 08:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Liberal media
editI can't speak for all who use the term, but I'm good friends with some people who work for Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network and I thought I'd try to put things into perspective for you after reading your thoughts on Talk:Homosexual agenda. In many countries the government-run media try to directly influence citizens' thoughts. The way some people see the "homosexual agenda" is that those who control the media promote secularism. It's not as much about hidden forces beyond our control as simply a cultural struggle. As homosexuality becomes more socially acceptable, they use the term "homosexual agenda" or "pro-gay agenda" in the same way you might use the term "right-wing agenda" or "Fundamentalist agenda". Hopefully that made sense - sorry for ranting. :) Thompsontough (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Adult Swim task force
editYou seem to be interested in Adult Swim, and I would appreciate if you would collaborate on it at the task force, found here. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well, unfortunately, I've been getting wrapped up in other articles so I've been neglecting this project somewhat. I reckon the best one to start with would be Aqua Teen Hunger Force, as it is the longest running and oldest of all AS shows. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of generations
editAn article that you have been involved in editing, List of generations, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of generations (2nd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Liked ur discussion
editI liked ur discussion on bobo doll and I am also a student of 2ndyear. I have my assignment of that topic . your review helped me aot in making my stuff. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.132.118.3 (talk) 18:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
editThe Minor Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your minor, but valuable and overdue cleanup here, and on some other page I noticed you recently. Much appreciated! :) Cheers, Amalthea 21:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC) |
An algebra over a field has THREE operations
editI was wondering if the definition at the beginning be simplified for non-math majors. I found a very nice and simple definition that explained the definition of an algebra perfectly: A set together with a pair of binary operations defined on the set. Usually, the set and the operations include an identity element, and the operations are commutative or associative. Nice, plain English. Start talking about the Ks and As in the next section, not the first definition. It's quite intimidating. ForestAngel (talk) 01:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's not right. You have to have not only the ring structure (a set with two binary operations obeying certain algebraic laws) but also the vector-space structure (where the addition in the vector space is the same as the addition in the ring, but you've also got multiplication by scalars). So it's really three operations:
- (1) addition,
- (2) multiplication of two members of the algebra, and
- (3) multiplication of a member of the algebra by a scalar.
- Michael Hardy (talk) 20:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- That's not right. You have to have not only the ring structure (a set with two binary operations obeying certain algebraic laws) but also the vector-space structure (where the addition in the vector space is the same as the addition in the ring, but you've also got multiplication by scalars). So it's really three operations:
Samurai cinema
editI undid your correction on Samurai cinema less because it is wrong than because it is not a minor edit. It is a much more complicated point that deserves expanded argument and references. For the time being, I think the swashbuckler reference should remain, first, because the sentence is about swords, and second, because Douglas Fairbanks swashbuckler films were a definite influence on the development of chanbara in the 1920s.
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
editHello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Survey
editHi ForestAngel!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 04:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
editWikiWomen Unite! | |
---|---|
Hi ForestAngel! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
editWikiWomen - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi ForestAngel! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)