Fleet Lists

Welcome!

Hello, Fleet Lists! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 07:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Fleet Lists, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fleet Lists! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Sydney Trains templates

See here and here for a full list of CityRail templates; the corresponding Sydney Trains templates are here and [1]. I'm no expert on those templates and would even have to do some research to find out the difference between the "right" and "left" templates (possibly an issue of direction?); Template talk:S-line may be a good place to ask for additional help.

On an unrelated note, the templates for the Bankstown line seem to disagree on the destination: "towards Circular Quay" vs. "towards City Circle" - is that deliberate, possibly because the rail line was extended under Sydney Trains? If not, that should be fixed.

On second thought, moving-and-redirecting might have been a wiser decision than duplicating that template. I'll think about that. Huon (talk) 21:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Links to sister projects.

In an old page for Strathfield railway station the article contained a photo gallery with some photos under the heading Gallery. In a subsequent edit this was removed and replaced by the link * Media related to Strathfield railway station at Wikimedia Commons under that heading to explain where the gallery photos could now be found. In other station articles such as Rydalmere the gallery was purely replaced by the link under External links as recommended in Wikipedia:Wikimedia_sister_projects#Where_to_place_links However it has been found that users have been critical of this as it does not explain where the gallery photos can now be found, hence the adoption of the Strathfield approach. But another editor has reversed that change on two occasions as it is considered against Wiki policy. This have been discussed with him on his talk page and I agree with him and as such this is not a dispute. See User_talk:Rb119. The alternate use of {{commons category|Strathfield railway station, Sydney}} as displayed here, which was in use in the older Strathfield version does not seem much better. The question I have is: How can we better explain that this link now replaces the Gallery without breaking the Wiki rules or is it acceptable to use the link under a heading such as gallery? I had already made such a change in over 50 other station articles which may now all need to be reversed.

Fleet Lists (talk) 05:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

RE: Doubtful posts

Hi there. I've reviewed their overnight posts and the link they've provided. Whilst I don't know the user's background, it does seem overly opinionated, not helped by the link being an online petition. Because of that, I'd say at the very least that it fails WP:NPOV and WP:YESPOV. A solution could be to perhaps re-write this in a more neutral tone - petition's aren't what I'd consider 'reputable neutral sources'.

If you choose to re-write it, perhaps this article can be used to make it sound more neutral Hope this helps. Nath1991 (talk) 04:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that article link - this is already covered in Airport, Inner West & South Line in a more neutral fashion and a more appropriate place. Hence I will delete it from the various stations with reference to Airport, Inner West & South LineFleet Lists (talk) 05:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opal card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Newcastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

RE: Circular Quay ferry wharf

Hello, Fleet Lists. You have new messages at Vesna Wylde's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Milsons Point railway station may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }</ref>}}<ref>{{Cite New South Wales transport timetables|Central Coast & Newcastle}}</ref>}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Transport Links

At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sydney/Railway stations#Transport Links I raised an issue concerning the inclusion of Transport Link information in the articles on train stations in Sydney Australia. Editor charlesdrakew has recently removed such information from Lindfield railway station and Macarthur railway station on the grounds that they broke the No Travel Guide rules.

There are many more stations such as Wahroonga railway station which contain similar information on which no action has been taken.

After reading the No Travel Guide paragaraph

“Travel guides. An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of the "best" restaurants, nor the current price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. While travel guides for a city will often mention distant attractions, a Wikipedia article for a city should only list those that are actually in the city. If you do wish to help write a travel guide, your contributions would be welcome at our sister project, Wikivoyage.”

I can not see where that rule is broken with the information supplied except possibly the reference to a timetable.

However in November last year the editor concerned deleted similar information from Liverpool railway station which at the time did not contain such references, so that can not be the only problem as far as he is concerned. After I tried to add it back then, he threatened to have me banned if I tried to add it again.

I have tried to ask him in the article referred to as to what he would like to see, but I have not received any reply.

I have also looked at some overseas stations such as Amsterdam Centraal railway station and Den Haag Centraal railway station where considerable bus information is present and which seems to be acceptable.

The comments from Gareth who has been the only person to comment, at least supports that some bus interchange information should be present.

For the sake of consistency in all trains station articles, I would like to know where I go from here. I would be happy to delete the timetable references if this is considered a problem and replace them with a reference to the website of the operator concerned.Fleet Lists (talk) 06:14, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Last night the Transport Links section for Circular Quay railway station was deleted. As this did not have timetable references, this can not be the only consideration. This also left a problem in that some wikilinks refer direct to the deleted section, so I will need to sort that out.Fleet Lists (talk) 06:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I am changing this to a regular {{help}} request because it appears the request does not require someone with the administrator tool set -- merely advise about an editorial dispute. Have you tried asking your question at WT:RR? Mkdw^talk 01:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes I Have Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains#Transport_Links but no response.Fleet Lists (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

I have removed your RFC. Right now you're in an editorial dispute involving another editor. The conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sydney/Railway stations#Transport Links is very difficult to follow for any outside reader. Even reading the entire discussion, it's not clear what you want or how you want the community involved. Do you want someone to step into the middle of your argument with the other editor? Even so, that's not really how RFC is set up if you've read the page about it, so it's not surprising you're having trouble attracting attention. Even your help request is long, draws attention to things I don't see as relevant and again it's difficult to exactly ascertain what you're asking. I think you're treating this like a court case to which it's not. Including things like the history of the dispute you're having with this other editor, the sequence of events, whether you received a reply, the one lone supporter you have, etc. isn't of much relevance to someone reading the conversation unless they're here to moderate it. An RFC is not a community moderation panel.

You can attempt to seek a third opinion once your conversation has been exhausted with the other editor. It is more set up as a judicial process in which you'll state your case, the other party will state theirs, and they'll offer you their opinion. Again, they won't come into the middle of your conversation and for you to expect them to read the entire previous discussion and follow along. You'll have to restart your argument with them in a summarized statement. If that fails, I suggest you write a clear and concise, emphasis on concise, question you wish to ask the members of the WikiProjects. Ask it in one place and direct their attention to it. IF that fails to draw attention, then turn it into WP:RFC but you need to read the entire page first. An RFC is not a request for comment on a drawn out conversation you're already having. Specifically look at the example section. It's a short and clean statement which the community will either support or oppose your proposal. Look at the other on-going RFC's to see how they're run. Mkdw^talk 03:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Archive

I suggest you read WP:ARCHIVE / WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE before you wholesale delete conversations from talk pages. Even if they're outdated. Mkdw^talk 04:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

cite to trove

your update to Goulburn was effective enough but rather short on detail that could have been provided while you were there copying the url. trove provides you with a cite button giving you complete wiki cites Dave Rave (talk) 08:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

good job, I'm in the middle of fixing that, but job done. I'm looking at the austli link, of course i can't figure out why it's wrong, but i figured where it is. I'll add the pdf in Dave Rave (talk)

Dave Rave Thanks you for the update - I live and learn even as a nearly 78 year old. I have also done a similar update to Crookwell railway line. Fleet Lists (talk) 08:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

78?! good job, thanx for listening. wiki cites are so convoluted Dave Rave (talk)

did a google search on austlii and num_act, an act is a Numbered Act

of course we all know that and it's (not) in the Cite documentation

so, if you catch a dead link again, try num_act (rolling eyes) Dave Rave (talk) 07:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

RailCorp's role

Hi, I see you're referencing RailCorp's asset-holding role in relation to NWRL. Although RailCorp continues to exist as the formal owner of the existing rail network, this does not necessarily mean new and additional assets will be transferred to RailCorp ownership – and I haven't seen anything public to suggest they will be. Do you have any references to support this? Mqst north (talk) 21:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

There is also nothing to say that RailCorp will NOT be the owner, as they are the legal entity which manages such investments. If anything a reference would be required if they are not to be the owner.Fleet Lists (talk) 21:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi again. That's not how it works. I have challenged your contention that RailCorp will own the NWRL. You need to provide a citation to restore it, not demand I prove a negative. Conversely, if you want to challenge the contention that TfNSW will be the owner, you can remove it or add a citation-needed tag.

While it's possible RailCorp will evolve into a general transport asset holding company, that hasn't happened yet, or (to my knowledge) been announced. It's also unlikely to proceed under RailCorp's current name. (In any case, TfNSW is the parent agency to RailCorp, so I don't see what the issue is.) Mqst north (talk) 21:54, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

I was trying to get consistency with other stations - but for the moment I will let the issue rest. Please also revert any others you have not done so far.Fleet Lists (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring

To prevent this going any further I am not sure where to go next with this. A recent new member has been deleting information from a number of New South Wales railway stations on the basis that it is not correctly referenced. The deleted information generally consists of Platform Boxes for which normally no references are required. However he thinks differently. Some stations concerned are Oak Flats railway station, Gerringong railway station, Berry railway station and Bomaderry railway station. Discussion on this was started by another editor on the user's talk page User_talk:Mqst_north#A bit of free advice and has continued there. I have restored the deleted information but I suspect that he will again the delete the information and I do not want to get into an edit war on this. This is not the first difference I have had with this new member.Fleet Lists Above item is just one. (talk) 04:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC) He has since again deleted some parts but leaving others. My understanding is that while there is a dispute, the status quo should remain and the data not deleted.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I think we're talking at cross-purposes some of the time. I've added sections to the talk pages of Gerringong railway station, Berry railway station and Bomaderry railway station so we can discuss further outside of edit summaries – and hopefully agree on a way forward for each. Mqst north (talk) 08:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I think we are getting somewhere - I have already replied to each of them. In fact for the bus operators my suggestion to adopt what is in Liverpool railway_station#Transport links is very similar to what you have since done in Bomaderry although I prefer to keep the standard heading "Transport Links" which I believe is more meaningful. Also there is a page Wikipedia:WikiProject Sydney/Railway stations which is well out of date - I did one update earlier this year but should be updated to confirm what we ultimately agree on so that this sort of thing will not come up again. It is interesting to see that this page does not mention the blue bus symbol but just mentions "bus", "train", etc.Fleet Lists (talk) 08:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I have no objection to that subheading being restored. As for the blue B logo, that makes sense in official contexts, but here it has no meaning. Since it's English Wikipedia, there's no need for a symbol when the word 'bus' is widely understood. Mqst north (talk) 08:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

WestConnex

I notice you made a change to the WestConnex article in order to revert an edit of mine. (I also notice that one of your previous edit to this page included putting a link to an online anti-WestConnex petition – which I would regard as a pretty blatant violation of NPOV.) I realise you and I have our differences on railway station pages, which I'm doing my best to engage with constructively, but going through my contribution list and needlessly reverting changes elsewhere on Wikipedia is not the way to move forward. Mqst north (talk) 08:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC): As far as thee previous post in WestConnex is concerned it is purely reporting a fact and not specifically pushing an opinion one way or another. As far as the reversion is concerned I believe there is nothing to stop that infobox being used on a multiple road exercise such as this and in fact is most helpful in showing a quick summary of what the article is about without having to read through the whole article and that is what the infobox is for. And as far as not moving forward how do you think I have felt over the last couple of days, continually wasting time reverting or changing posts?Fleet Lists (talk) 08:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

WestConnex is really five distinct road projects; "WestConnex" is a politically-conferred monicker, best understood as a scheme or program of works. So to put an infobox on it that focuses on operational data like exits and interchanges is inappropriate – the place for that is the separate M4 and M5 pages. Mqst north (talk) 08:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Wasted time

user:Grahamec It appears that I have been wasting my time maintaining the information on Sydney and New South Wales train stations over the past year or so after most other editors in this area have either retired or are no longer active for other reasons. Recent upstart member User_talk:Mqst_north who seems to believe that consensus means his own opinion, is continually destroying long established information, doing away with templates which are used worldwide and replacing them with very minimal information - with stations like Kiama railway station now not even showing what train services use the station. The historic information he has added is great but it should not be at the expense of service information. This is being discussed at Talk:Bomaderry railway station#Platform allocations and also at User_talk:Mqst north#A bit of free advice where so far no consensus has been reached but this has not stopped him continuing his destructive posts at other stations like Kiama. It is a pity that the great work done by previous contributors to these stations, is now being destroyed by someone who is obviously only interested in what he wants and has no respect for what others think. He has even gone to the extreme of accusing me and another contributor who opposed him, to be sockpuppets. This is not the only occasion on which he has accused opponents, who did not involve me, of being sockpuppets. Hence I think it is time I went on to do other things which hopefully will not be destroyed in this manner.Fleet Lists (talk) 22:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Massive Page Blanking in NSW transport articles

I don't know anyone who regularly edits these articles but it seems User:Mqst_north has been going through the articles in this area and blank -> redirecting large articles. Particularly after NPP deleted a bunch of weird template things he made in article space.--Savonneux (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

User:SavonneuxThank you for contacting me. I have just about given up in disgust. This user has hit us like a cyclone and has made numerous changes against consensus. See four paragraphs above this one and also Bomaderry railway station and the talk page, where he has deleted the standard platform boxes and service direction platforms which he claims are not acceptable as they they are not referenced yet they are used worldwide in stations. He has done this in all station listed on his home page under South Coast Line. Also see User talk:Mqst north#A bit of free advice. I prepared an Admin report on him which no one acted on and has been archived. He also reported me and another user who disagreed with him as Sock Puppets. I suspect that this time he is trying to delete soo me date and replace it with Templates. Also he got an admin to rename two Sydney stations which was done but this was immediately protested against by Scottish user s and hence the rename was reverted, but this user is still trying to get it done. He just does not want to listed to anyone else. As a result of this I have just about given up trying to keep some sense in these articles. Unfortunately all past editors who have worked on these pages have retired or moved on. I could go on with things he has done but I think this is enough.Fleet Lists (talk) 07:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fleet Lists. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Opal Card page changes

As one of the primary editors of the Opal Card page, wanted your opinion on this http://en.m.wiki.x.io/wiki/Opal_card#/talk/1 Moa999 (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fleet Lists. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NightRide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Shore Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macquarie University railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State Transport Authority (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Blacktown railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Schofields

Schofields railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Schofields

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Thoughts about sandbox

I have seen the thank you note you left on my talk page, and thank you for starting the on demand section yesterday. I have expanded the list of on demand services, similar to the one on Transport Info website.

As for your draft prose on your sandbox, I think it is good, but I think a simpler table should remain to summarise the current contracts and operator, while the history will be explained in the prose. Prior history for each region (particularly around 2004) can also be explained, as many bus operators (eg. Baxter's Bus Lines Region 13, Harris Park Transport Regions 4 and 7) gave up and sold their businesses to the larger operators, possibly as a result of the implementation of contract regions. Marcnut1996 (talk) 04:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Deleting a redirect

I have now been on wiki for nearly four years and during that time have made over 6000 edits - mainly cleaning up Transport items in New South Wales Australia.

I was under the impression that to delete a redirect to allow a new page to replace it I had to request that to be done by an administrator. However I noticed that an editor en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:Kerinlong who only joined on 20 August 2018 appears to have deleted a redirect himself - see en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Log/delete at 14.31 (Sydney time Australia) today.

14:31, 21 August 2018 Kerinlong (talk | contribs) deleted redirect Mernda railway line by overwriting (G6: Deleted to make way for move) (thank)

If he can do that, how can I do that if I need to do that in future. When I have needed to do it, I have done a rename to a similar name so that I avoided the issue.Fleet Lists (talk) 06:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Autoconfirmed users can move a page onto certain redirects; it happens automatically as part of the move and is not a separate delete action. Moving over redirect explains that the redirect must have only one entry in its edit history and must be a redirect to the page being moved onto it. This particular adaptation allows undoing of moves, which normally leave behind a single-edit redirect, without having to get administrators involved. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

re: User:GPFC01

Hi there! Just a note, we don't delete people's userpages just because they're inactive. ansh666 08:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Chatswood Station

Back on 15 February a change was made to Chatswood railway station [2] from {{s-line|system=NSW TrainLink intercity|line=Central Coast & Newcastle|previous=St Leonards|next=Gordon|notemid=''(peak hour services)''}} to {{s-line|system=NSW TrainLink intercity|line=Central Coast & Newcastle|previous=Artarmon|next=Lindfield|notemid=''(peak hour services)''}}

{{s-line|system=NSW TrainLink intercity|line=Central Coast & Newcastle|previous=St Leonards|next=Gordon|notemid=''(peak hour services)''}} to {{s-line|system=NSW TrainLink intercity|line=Central Coast & Newcastle|previous=Artarmon|next=Lindfield|notemid=''(peak hour services)''}}

The change from Gordon to Lindfield has worked fine but not the change from St Leonards to Artarmon which also does not display above. This was missed by the editor 122.106.246.104 Nothing is now displayed for trips towards Central. I only picked this up last night when I was cleaning up some edits made by the same editor a bit earlier. I have tried various things but can not to get it to work.Fleet Lists (talk) 00:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

It took a bit of looking to figure this one out. As best I can tell, what you saw was because Artarmon was not in the list at {{NSW TrainLink intercity stations}}. So I added it and I think that has fixed the immediate problem you pointed out.

For some reason, the scheme used by this template was different from the scheme used by {{Sydney Trains stations}}, which uses a default construct to find stations whose article names (or redirects) follow the naming convention even if they are not in the list. I didn't attempt to do any further reconciliation. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

But I did post a query at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Use of default in station lists, which you are welcome to comment on. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction. I made that mistake in writing the post here, too, but managed to catch it before the final post. Maybe I should ask that the {{tl}} template ignore any leading "Template:". — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Newcastle

Ah, no worries! Thanks for the heads up. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Read This Please

Why You Removed the Image on Page Pope Anastasius I Simple Lang Ako (talk) 23:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Thought to be the same as another photo already present - removed as part of clean up of other problems created by User 119.92.0.160Fleet Lists (talk) 02:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

medalist vs medallist

This is an American English (medalist) vs British English (medallist) issue. I note that medallist exists and redirects to medalist but equally it could be the other way around (it depends on who first wrote the article, a Yank or a Brit), e.g Icing (food) is named with British English rather than the American term "frosting". All efforts to replace "icing" with "frosting" at Lamington are fought off (as lamingtons are Australia, therefore its outer layer must be spelt the Australian way). All of these variants-of-English arguments were resolved years ago and the principles are documented at WP:COFAQ#ENGLISH. For articles to which Australian English applies, we tend to defer to the Macquarie Dictionary (if anyone has one handy) or look at what appears to be the more common usage in Australian writing. For example, a quick search of the ABC website (which tends to be a good indicator of educated Australian English) produces 270 articles using "medalist" against over 5000 using "medallist", so Australian English would appear to follow British English in the use of "medallist" and Maryborough is Australian content. Kerry (talk) 13:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fleet Lists. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Photos on railway station pages

I've removed the galleries from Rhodes and St Peters. I have to say that, as a user of pages, I generally prefer to see a few photos on the article page than to go to commons, which often has a lot of poor photos that do not add to the quality of the article page. Sometimes it is difficult to see if there is a link to commons and sometimes there is no link, but there are actually photos at commons. I only use commons to upload my photos because it seems to be an easier process than loading them via the wikipedia article. I have been adding photos for NSW heritage items and, in that regard, have added photos for the Auburn Railway Signal Box and the Burwood rail underbridge and I propose taking photos of the Ultimo Road railway underbridge. One walks over the latter when walking along the walk to Darling Harbour from Central but I can't find that subject covered specifically at Wikipedia. Anyway, no more galleries from me as far as railway station pages go. Collywolly (talk) 21:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Strings in templates

I am trying to learn more about certain templates facilities. {{str right|{{{1}}}|1}} as I see it gives the information from the string, bypassing the first character. But how would I code it if I only want the 2nd, 3rd and 4th characters ie - a length of 3 characters? I would think that this must be documented somewhere in Wiki but I have not been able to find it.Fleet Lists (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

See Template:String-handling templates for an overview. {{str mid|Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz|2|3}} gives bcd, which I assume is what you were looking for. Huon (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Brisbane train timetables

Thinking about it a little bit more, I *think* it may be possible for me to use AutoWikiBrowser to seek out the manual citations to the timetables (whether before or after your recent manual updates to the articles) and replace them with our new templated citations. And then as you expand the template to cover other kinds of public transport, we can probably do something similar with them. I say "*think*" because it involves a computer reading and recognising manually written things and sometimes that is not a computer's particular strength. However, I would hope that I could do the bulk of them that way, and then I can think of another way to identify the "left overs" which might need to be done manually. Before I start that though, I need to know you are happy with the templates for the Brisbane railway lines before I start using them for real. Initially I will be targetting the railway stations on the Brisbane lines. Later as the template is expanded to other services, we can repeat the exercise. So let me know when you are happy with the templates for the Brisbane train lines and I will make a start and see how it goes. Kerry (talk) 04:06, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:When I received your message I was just in the process of adding an entry for the Inner North timetable which is different to the others in that it does not have an intermediate page which points to the PDF. That will be the last of the Brisbane train ones as far as I know. So I think the template is now ready to do whatever you would like to try. Any help in that area would be greatly appreciated. I tried some bus timetables in Varsity Lakes railway station to prove that will also work but from there is a lower priority part of the exercise. I will shortly be off to a Christmas function in our retirement village, Cheers - Lourie.Fleet Lists (talk) 04:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

OK, I have updated all the railway line timetable links (or so I hope). For working out what bus routes need to be added to the template, you may find these two search links useful in locating any existing links to Translink timetables (just click on them and they will do the search):

• [3]
• [4]

Note the only difference between the two is the first searches for "http" and the other "https". While there appear to be a couple of 200 in total between them, there are not as many as that in terms of updating the Queensland Timetables template. Obviously some of the them are duplicates as a number of stations may connect to the same bus route. Also a number of them are on Talk pages, Sandboxes, etc and can be ignored. If you can update the template with the desired citation for the bus routes, I can go through and update the articles themselves to use the Template in the same way as I did the railway stations. It doesn't have to be done in one pass. If you want to just add a few bus routes to the template, I can update the articles to use the template for those routes you've just added, then we repeat the process until it's all done. Kerry (talk) 01:55, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:Unfortunately I dont think the bus timetables are as simple as the train ones in some respects. Take Beenleigh_railway_station which has eight timetables with 4 references but under the proposed system each route will have its own reference as each route has its own intermediate page. So it wont be a simple replacement for each route. It looks to me like very much a manual process which I wont object doing. This was already the case in of Varsity Lakes railway station which I did as a trial. Perhaps you could do the timetables with single routes, leaving multiple ones to me.Fleet Lists (talk) 03:06, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Hmm. Looking at Beenleigh railway station, I see you are reusing the citation with a multiple route title. You could instead do individual citations for each route number, which just happen to have the same URL in them? After all, Translink might split/aggregate timetable information differently the next time around. But I think it's your call - you are the one doing the work. Kerry (talk) 05:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:Currently the citation is being reused, before I got into the act. To create individual ones is exactly what I am proposing hence not a direct replacement, as was done in Varsity Lakes railway stationFleet Lists (talk) 05:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:I have only found three timetables with a single route and which are present in more than two railway stations (or bus stations) - These are 649, 539 and 500 which have been added to the template. Thank You.Fleet Lists (talk) 03:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

OK, I updated the citations for routes 649, 539 and 500. I gather you must have already done the ones for 753, 757, 759 and 760 since I can't find any instances of these in the generated lists? If so, is there anything else you would like me to do? Kerry (talk) 06:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:Thank You - you have been a fantastic help. Nothing else at the moment. I will work through the various links as time goes on.Fleet Lists (talk) 06:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Re:Caboolture railway station do you want me to roll out the Spirit of Queensland and Tilt Train timeables across all the relevant articles? Kerry (talk) 13:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:Thank You for that offer.The URL's I know of are [5], [6] , [7], [8], [9] , [10] , [11] and [12] In the case of the first of each pair I think are mostly archived ones. Thank you again - I will be out most of the day. Fleet Lists (talk) 21:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

I think I have done all these now. Kerry (talk) 03:41, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:Fantastic - I will continue to do the bus done at a fairly slow pace.Have just done the Caloundra Bus Station ones. Have a Good Christmas.Fleet Lists (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

I am happy to do more of them. Just tell me which ones to do so we don't get under one another's feet doing the same ones. I'm doing them a bit more slowly than I was as I get caught up with Christmas arrangements etc but it's not that hard a job with AutoWikiBrowser once you work out the pattern to tell it to look for and how to replace it (which I have now got down to a fine art for these timetables). Kerry (talk) 04:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:I would like to battle on with the bus timetables but could you possibly do one for CityCat which has entries at various wharves and also in Transdev. It should link to [13] It appears in a lot of wharves so well worth doing. I am not sure if the other ferry services listed in [14] are worth doing. This job is getting bigger all the time.Fleet Lists (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Bigger now but hopefully with less work in the future. I've added the Brisbane ferry services: CityCat, CityHopper and the 3 cross-river services (Kangaroo Point-CBD, Bulimba-Teneriffe, New Farm Park-Norman Park) to the template and replaced the citations in the ferry wharf articles with the applicable template. Kerry (talk) 06:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond:I think all the bus timetables have now been done. I have also corrected the Rail map and various busway maps in various stations and line articles but not using the template at this stage. Perhaps a job for next year to move them to the template so that there will be less work for future map changes. I have also found quite a few station maps both rail and busway, which would be External links in the various stations concerned eg [15] - perhaps also something for next year - I still need to do something similar in Sydney. Happy New Year. Fleet Lists (talk) 04:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

temmplate question

In Gold Coast railway line there is a timetable citation to [http://translink.com.au/sites/default/files/assets/timetables/170724-gold-coast-airport.pdf Gold Coast Line timetable - Monday 24 July 2017]. Should that be {{Queensland Timetables|Airport}}? Kerry (talk) 01:55, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@Kerry Raymond: I think we have four options. 1 Just link as you suggest. 2 Link with {{Queensland Timetables|Gold Coast}} and change the template to accept both the Airport and Gold Coast options in case at some future time they have separate timetables, 3 as per 2 and also change the stations on the Gold Coast side of the City to use the Gold Coast option instead of Airport and 4 as per three create a separate entry in the template as there is a separate page for the Gold Coast [16] . I think I would prefer option 2 at this point in time to give some future flexibility.Thank you again for all the work you have out into this.Fleet Lists (talk) 02:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy to go with whichever one you want. 2 sounds fine to me. Kerry (talk) 05:08, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

your observation

yup thats what happens - there are articles that have surprises, and there are those that dont... big problem with oz entities is when they want to edit their own wikipedia articles... JarrahTree 07:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Tool bars and editors

Just a comment. I notice that you tend to use the old format for creating citations and I wondered if this might be because you had a fairly long time away from Wikipedia and weren't aware of some of the changes that make contributing a lot easier. To enable these, there are two preferences to set. The first one is the citation form for use in the source editor (which I can see you use, as if you use the Visual Editor, if flags it as such in the edit summary). When logged in, go to Preferences top right of any screen, then select the "Editing" tab, then scroll down to "Enable the editing toolbar" and make sure it is ticked. If not, tick it and click on Save (lower left of screen). The effect of this is to give you a toolbar that has a "Cite" button, which when clicked, displays a Template dropdown list to let you create web citations, news citations, etc by filling in the fields of a form and it makes the {{cite web}} or {{cite news}} markup automatically. The other innovation is the Visual Editor which makes contributing to Wikipedia similar to using Microsoft Word (what you see is what you get, more or less). I use Visual Editor a lot for content editing. To enable it, again go to Preferences, then Editing and then make sure that "Temporarily disable the visual editor while it is in beta" is NOT ticked and that (immediately below) "Editing mode:" is set to "Show me both editor tabs" (and then Save lower left). This will give you two ways to edit any article, using the Visual editor (the tab called "edit") or the traditional source editor (the tab called "edit source"). Visual editor makes many things easy. Citations are Cite > Manual > Web (for a web citation) and fill out a form. Clicking on a citation enables you to edit it the same way or to copy and paste it (the same as doing <ref name=blah/> in the source editor) or you can do it with Cite > Reuse and pick from the list of citations. You can even copy and paste content (including citations) between articles (provided both articles are open in Visual Editor). And of course if you find you don't like these new tools, you can go back to Preferences and disable them. Happy to answer any questions about any of these things. Kerry (talk) 04:00, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Blocked URL's

Earlier today I came across a blocked URL (I assume by Firefox) in Z-class Melbourne tram http://www.hawthorntramdepot.org.au/trams/yt81.htm which I rightly or wrongly changed to an archived version of the URL. An External link search also found this URL in Karachi to Melbourne Tram which I also updated the same way. I then did an external link search for the shorter http://www.hawthorntramdepot.org.au/ which brought up another 102 links in various pages which all appear to be blocked. How should this situation be handled? Fleet Lists (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Those URLs open fine for me (in Firefox). What is the exact message you are seeing when you attempt to open them?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict)

It would help to know a bit more about your sense of "blocked URLs". The URLs you mentioned are not blocked for me and it's not yet time to insist that all URLs use https. But as you come across http URLs that you find also work with https, you may change them. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

@Fuhghettaboutit and Jmcgnh: Thank you for your replies. It also happens when using htpps. Message:"Internet Security - Potential Phishing Arrempt. This website tries to trick visitors to submit sensitive personal information such as login data or credit card numbers. Go Back to previous page?" This than gives options "Go Back" or "Ignore thread" It then gives an option to report an incorrectly blocked page which goes to [17] and includes the name of the URL concerned. The message then shows webpage www.eset.com at the bottom of the message. So far I had not been prepared to take the ignore thread option. Sorry I had not supplied more information initially. Fleet Lists (talk) 07:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Eset is a company that sells anti-virus and similar programs. It's beginning to look like you're seeing a false positive. My advice would be that you should avoid replacing URLs based on these reports, though it's certainly okay to ask other editors if they see a problem. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Sounds to me like you have a virus that's generating these messages, unrelated to these websites.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

NSW/Vic

certainly is a NSW station, but may well be the end of the V/Line too ? Dave Rave (talk) 10:00, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

@Dave Rave: Undoubtedly you are correct in that respect. But the editor concerned has over the past three months or so made at least 40 edits using 5 different IP addresses, all but one of which have been reverted, to at least 20 railway stations mostly in Victoria but also Roma Street in Brisbane where he generally has changed the operator style of the station concerned. If in Victoria changing from Metro to V/Line and vice versa but in most cases also making some other subtle changes like in this latest Albury case adding a blank in the main photo name hence it not displaying and changing the next station from Wangaratta to Seymour. Once an IP address is blocked he seems to move to another one. One of the IP addresses has been blocked four times so far. Cheers Fleet Lists (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Archive references

Hi Fleet Lists,

Thanks for all your work updating references. Just wanted to let you know that by using the |archive-url and |archive-date parameters in CS1 templates like {{cite web}}, you can preserve a link to the original URL in the formatted references. Triptothecottage (talk) 12:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mosman Bay ferry services (numbered F6) has been accepted

Mosman Bay ferry services (numbered F6), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Project-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mgbo120 (talk) 17:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neutral Bay ferry services has been accepted

Neutral Bay ferry services, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

List of cities in Australia

Just an FYI, the IP you reverted at List of cities in Australia is a long term, IP hopping vandal at this and other articles. He primarily adds non-cities to the list or edits town articles changing them to cities despite what sources say. I've just reported him to AIV and request page protection for List of cities in Australia. Chhers. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Melbourne rail station articles

Hi,

I just wanted to say thanks for your work in updating the code across all the rail station pages.

Cheers, Anothersignalman (talk) 03:54, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

@Anothersignalman:Thank you for those comments, You may also be able to help me out with some comments about article List of bus routes in Melbourne at Talk:List_of_bus_routes_in_Melbourne#External_Links where so far I have had two totally opposite replies as to what should be done which makes it difficult to get a consensus as to which way to go.Fleet Lists (talk) 22:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

timor/arafura distinction

you got something like a cite for that? when I lived in Darwin it was the arafura, maybe a banda sea event moved it all.... JarrahTree 11:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Timor_Sea and https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Arafura_Sea - the boundaries between, I will grant you are not very clear from the visual aids - maybe there was a bias towards the arafura by some that didnt bother with the IMO definitions - I reckon, even if you are correct, an average reader would not be able to glean the IMO material to see where one starts and the other ends... sigh... JarrahTree 11:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

The Timor Sea article shows Darwin as being a settlement on the Timor Sea in the Infobox while the Arafura Sea article makes no mention of it. That is what I based it on. If the spelling had been correct I may not have looked further.Fleet Lists (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: The Beagle Gulf article also tends to confirm it.Fleet Lists (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

It is a pain - If I get it right the 1953 and 1971 formats of the IMO documents suggest that the Indian Ocean goes to Bass Strait, but some Australian authorities suggest it stops at Cape Leeuwin, and in some edit wars of the last 10 years, the Southern Ocean has existed (or not). JarrahTree 12:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Sydney Metro pointer

In my opinion this pointer isn't needed as Sydney Trains is quite distinct, being the larger network and having its own brand. Perhaps there can be a pointer to Railways in Sydney, which may or may not be justified. Cheers, trainsandtech (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2019 (UTC) @Trainsandtech: The very fact that Sydney Trains is the broader brand, readers would expect it to include information on Sydney Metro but as it does not include such information, I believe that such a pointer is important. Cheers - Fleet Lists (talk) 06:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC) @Fleet Lists: Fair enough, trainsandtech (talk) 06:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Toronto line

Hi,

You recently reverted my addition of the Toronto line to Railways in Sydney#Closed lines based on the line not being in Sydney. It is, however, mentioned on List of closed Sydney railway stations and I was wondering if you'd agree with me that it should accordingly be removed here too. Thanks, trainsandtech (talk) 23:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@Trainsandtech: Yes definitely should also be removed from there. Should we have an equivalent for closed stations and lines outside of Sydney? Only recently I was thinking about this when it was suggested that Dunmore railway station should be deleted from the NSW Trainlink list of stations. That was solved by instead of deleting it, it was treated as a previous name for Shellharbour Junction railway station but that may not have been the ultimate solution. Or should Category:Closed regional railway lines in New South Wales and Category:Disused regional railway stations in New South Wales suffice. I think the latter would be good enough. There would be a lot of work creating new lists covering all those stations. Perhaps a reference should be included in the Sydney lists as to where regional ones can be found. Fleet Lists (talk) 00:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

I agree, there should ideally be an equivalent article for closed lines and stations in NSW. I imagine it would be a lot of work though. Regards, trainsandtech (talk) 00:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

User:Tony Rodi

Tony Rodi (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC) Dear editor, User Fleet Lists. Thanks for your undo and reversion on my edit. The intention was more for factual reference to material rather than self promotion. If the same links were referred to by others, would that be acceptable? My leading role in, and newspaper articles regarding the most significant cultural and historic urban developments in Australia include the Sydney Morning Herald, The Telegraph, Architectural Review Australia, Television interviews on ABC SBS and all commercial television stations in Australia, and many more media outlets. I expect that I would not be exaggerating to suggest that I am in fact, the most publicised Architect in Australia. To say so is just factual, although it may be seen as self promotion. Please accept my apologies if I have not edited according to Wikipedia requirements. I would very much appreciate your assistance in providing information that does have historical significance. Articles on related subjects outside of Wikipedia seem to be controlled by vested interests, and determined to exclude the most important details. That may have a lot to do with obscuring politically sensitive issues and corruption. Sincerely Yours Tony Rodi Tony Rodi (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

User:Tony RodiPlease do not post such items to a User's personal page. They should be posted to the user's talk page where I have moved this. Also before posting a new item a "New section" should be created with an appropriate name which I have done here. The Talk:Ashbury, New South Wales page is also such a mess because various new items have been created without a new heading, thereby making it virtually impossible to follow what is what. Where you add references to an article they should use the correct reference format so that the references are included in the reference section at the bottom of the page. Have a look at other references where the <ref></ref> tags are used. They should not be plain URL's included in the text.Fleet Lists (talk) 03:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

G’day. What did I say about people debating on northern sydney again?

Hey mate, just want to say thank you for being helpful. You’re one of quite a few long time editors who’ve been super patient and respectful towards me as a new editor learning the best way to edit. I’m sorry you had to see an unnecessary argument on my talk page. But remember what I said? Northern sydney gets super sensitive to edit or to talk about it seems. Just look at the history of the north shore page. It’s an emotional journey speaking about Sydney regions on here.

Cheers —HornsbyBbSyd (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

@HornsbyBbSyd:The editor concerned is in a similar war with the editor mentioned in the section above this. I notice you do not have an email address registered on wiki. If you do register I could email you more information. Your email address will not be shown to any other editors including me but any editor can use the wiki email address allocated to you (you probably wont know what it is) and wiki then transfer messages sent to that email address to your email address and vice versa. That can be very handy at times.Fleet Lists (talk) 23:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Hey mate, I've just verified my email. Cheers HornsbyBbSyd (talk) 10:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Why did you edit the gateway module out?

It is a thing, and I am set on making it, I just have not got any funding Uhhh556675665 (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I did not edit out your edit - I fixed something else. However I totally agree with the explanation given by the editor who did, on the article home page.Fleet Lists (talk) 22:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bonnyrigg Heights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City of Liverpool (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Help Request At File talk:Telfords TV6238 at Sutherland Station.JPG

In answer to your help request on the above file talk page, I have moved this to commons:File:Telfords TV6238.JPG which removes the problem of the name. Those categories do not exist as far as I can see, can you link to where you want the image to display (use : to stop the category link on this talk page Example: Category:Category Demo) - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 07:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@Rich Smith: Thank you for moving the file. I have now been able to add the category statements. At Cronulla railway station, Sydney it leaves the name somewhat short as it makes no mention that it is at Cronulla station. But what confuses me more is why it had to be moved - does this always have to be done when uploading a file which I want in commons or can it be done direct? And if I need to move them I will need to find out how to do it - the fact that the original of this one now needs to be deleted makes me think that I should be able to do it direct. And if I want to use it both in commons and in an article does it need to be uploaded separately for those things?Fleet Lists (talk) 09:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Any image in Commons can be used on any article on any language Wikipedia, you can upload direct to Commons by going to the upload wizard on Commons - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 09:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

TAHE Question on Darling Harbour Yard

Could you please see the talk page for Darling Harbour Yard? Thanks! Fork99 (talk) 13:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

@Fork99:It is not the only one like that. I suggest we leave this one and others like it until we have done them all and then review those left in one go rather than do them one at a time.Fleet Lists (talk) 22:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Services in general

Also, if you don't mind, I'd like to uncollapse the services on most articles that have one to few services (like this), and leave the articles with many services (like this for example) collapsed. I think services should only be collapsed if they greatly affect the length of the article itself, not just the infobox. Cards84664 06:45, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

@Cards84664:Mainly done before I took over - I agree that stations with few services should not have the services collapsed.Fleet Lists (talk) 06:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

And one more thing, since Australia overall has adopted a local to longest distance hierarchy with services, I think it'll help consistency if Sydney Metro goes first, as I tested on Chatswood. Cards84664 07:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

I just noticed that NSW TrainLink Intercity is backwards, left is right, right is left, that should be flipped as templates are converted too. Cards84664 18:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

@Cards84664:Thank you for doing Chatswood - I had hardly expected to see the Sydney Metro module in use the same day after I had just created it. Also thank you for adding the "one way" to the Journey Beyond entry for Central. But I have added "From Perth" to it to show the direction in which the one way applies - I found it confusing without that. Also I have tried to add this entry to Central railway station, Sydney replacing part of the existing old code but I have not had any luck. Can you see if you can get it to work?Fleet Lists (talk) 23:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I've added the line for Journey Beyond and converted Central's Metro to the module on its own. Cards84664 23:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Chatswood railway station

Care to help me with formatting on Chatswood railway station? The reverting editors seem unfamiliar with the template format, and one even used a fake revert summary so it wouldn't notify me of the revert. Cards84664 01:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Disregard that, I've warned the one for edit warring. Cards84664 02:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Module:Adjacent stations/Sydney Trains

@Cards84664:I have just added T8 the last live line as far as I know. Now there is recently closed T6 Carlingford Line Should that be added here as Carlingford Line or should there be a separate module for closed lines? There are other closed lines but they were a long time ago pre Sydney Trains and I wont address those until I have finished the live ones completely.Fleet Lists (talk) 23:39, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

That can be added there, in an alphabetical list starting below the current services. (with a Carlingford parameter instead of a T6 parameter, although we could still show the T6 icon) Cards84664 05:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Town Hall railway station, Sydney

@Cards84664:Thanks for the answer on the Carlingford Line - that is what I was hoping you would say. I have started work on Town Hall station at the bottom of User:Fleet Lists/sandbox. I can not get the through-right parameter on T2 or the through-left parameter to work on T8. Also as far as I can see the through parameter is on the wrong side in T8 in the current Town Hall article. Dont worry about the gaps in the line numbers - I will sort that out as I still need to add some other things to it. Any help would be appreciated.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Got it, it's through-left or through-right. Cards84664 15:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

@Cards84664:Thank you for your efforts there. I see where I went wrong. However it showed that what I really wanted to achieve is not supported ie have both a destination station and the through parameter especially at other stations on the City Circle loop. Hence I abandoned the idea of using the through parameter so that I can use the same format in both directions at all stations concerned. I should have Town Hall ready for upload tomorrow. Also I found that User:Mackensen had already created a module Module:Adjacent stations/State Rail Authority sometime last year - to keep track of them all I have added an existing template category to that and the three modules we have created - we will still need to create one for Sydney Ferries. This is going to be a big job with probably over 60 templates to be deprecated as we go along. Should we wait to request their deletion until it is all done or should we request a deletion every 10 or so templates which have expired? Some templates which were replaced in 2019 still need to be deleted. Also I am not planning to update articles like this User:MrHarper/RB. Fleet Lists (talk) 04:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

We can focus on the s-line templates when all currently operating stations have them replaced. Cards84664 18:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Also, go into your wikipedia preferences, under the gadgets tab, select "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange". You'll then be able to see the issue with Central Coast & Newcastle on Town Hall. Cards84664 02:31, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Cootamundra, Metro and Newcastle Interchange

@Cards84664:Thanks for making those changes to Cootamundra which I cannot finish until I add the appropriate line information to the module concerned. Also I need to change the line key for Sydney Metro from M to M1 - I copied the M from a template which had a bug in it which resulted in some calls being rejected. I will be adding the second line later this week as M2.By chance I found this template Template:CityRail color/null which did not have category in it. This flagged a number of Metro entries for the second line as errors which I sorted out yesterday. And now for a question. What should we do with Newcastle Interchange? It is the only location which uses the Newcastle Light Rail templates. Is it worth creating a separate module just for that? None of the other NSW light rail lines use such templates. Fleet Lists (talk) 23:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

TAHE for closed items

having visited Glenbrook Deviation (1892) the access road to the site of the mushroom farm is now 'barred' by a Crown Lands sign ... being such an old item would the TAHE be correct ?Dave Rave (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

@Dave Rave: Thanks for pointing that out. I have reverted. It is not the only one in that situation. Fleet Lists (talk) 06:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

does RailCorp sound correct ? I know they never let it go but the Crown Lands sign ... or is that some generic govt policy catch-all type thing ? Dave Rave (talk) 08:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Dave Rave: I am open to any suggestion as I have doubts about anything I come up with.Fleet Lists (talk) 09:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

TfD word question

Hey, I noticed you are nominating templates with the word "Reprecated". Did you mean "Deprecated"? --Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

@Gonnym: Oops - yes - I will fix.Fleet Lists (talk) 11:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Quick question

Hey, do you mind if you could warn the user at User_talk:124.168.131.35 for vandalism for their edit you reverted on NSW TrainLink fleet? I think that the user meets the requirement for a admin block (5 warnings so far and vandalism within the past couple of days), but it got rejected the other day. See a list of their meaningless contributions at Special:Contributions/124.168.131.35. Also, if you are warning a user of anything, does that person have to be the person who reverted the edit or can it be anyone? Just wondering. Thanks, Fork99 (talk) 06:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Fork99: He has now been blocked for a month.But he will just change his IP as he has been doing for a couple of years now as this is not he first time I have reported an IP with the same pattern of posts.Fleet Lists (talk) 08:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Queensland Adjacent stations

@Cards84664: I have not found anyone who could do the Adjacent stations for Queensland so today I created the first module for TransLink Module:Adjacent stations/TransLink and then tried to update Cultural Centre busway station which worked except that I could not get the right option of "Woolloongabba or Springwood" to work from the module. But then I added "|to-right2=Woolloongabba or Springwood" after which it worked OK. But I did not think there should be need to add that. I think I must be missing something but what is it?Fleet Lists (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Fixed it. Cards84664 12:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Australia Barnstar of National Merit
		Thank you for contributing to Australia-related topics! Firestar464 (talk) 03:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Finished Adjacent Stations for the entire Victorian network

What do you think of it? Particularly Caroline Springs railway station.Techie3 (talk) 15:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

@Techie3: Great - well done - but [18] still lists 11 stations which need to be done - mainly planned stations but 4 on the Albury line are not. As far as Caroline Springs is concerned, I have added a wikilink to the Melton line in the V/Line module which supplies a better link in the stations which contain this line. Fleet Lists (talk) 21:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Special:WantedTemplates

I hope you don't mind, but I have removed this page from Special:WantedTemplates and WP:Database reports/Transclusions of deleted templates by wrapping the missing templates in nowiki tags. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

@Plastikspork: Why should I mind? Anything to improve the situation. I am more concerned that I am making a nuisance of myself with all the large template delete request which I have submitted recently - one of which you acted on yesterday. I have at least another four lots to go and also a few smaller ones. I am still very much in the learning process as how this should be handled as I have not previously been involved in this area. Every time I look I find more of these old templates which need to be deleted. Nothing has been done on South Australia so far. I have sent a message to the local editor who looks after that but I have not received any reply so far. That could add even more to the workload. Fleet Lists (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Adelaide Metro colourbox issue, help please!

Hey there! The colour code and name for the Tonsley line needs to be replaced with the Flinders line name and colour. Do you happen to know or know someone who knows how to change the name and colour of the Tonsley line to the Flinders line in the colourbox at Template:Adelaide Metro line colourbox? I tried to do it myself, but it didn’t work as I think there’s another separate template or something that it relies on. The reason I ask is because I've asked various people active on SA public transport articles, but no one responds on their talk pages. Also, this is because in List of railway stations in Adelaide, the links to Tonsley line in the Railway line(s) column of the table need to be changed to Flinders line. Cheers, Fork99 (talk) 04:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Fork99: Good one. See Template:Rail-interchange for which rint is short. Go to Specific by Country and click on Australia where you will then find what is defined for the various cities including Adelaide. We can not edit that but need to submit changes through its Sandbox and tested in its testcase before requesting the changes on the template talk page. I requested some changes to Sydney in September and Melbourne in early December but it appears that those requests have been archived by now. Sandbox [19] and testcases [20] If I remember correctly it is easier to update the testcases first and then the sandbox where you can use the testcases to prove that the changes suggested are working correctly before they can be accepted by the Admin concerned. Best of luck. Dont be afraid to ask if you want to know more. Unfortunately I have just about forgotten what needs to be done.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Fork99:Actually Melbourne was back in November but I have found the changes I requested there in [21] and here are the matching changes to the testcases which took me four efforts to get right [22]Fleet Lists (talk) 05:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thank you so much! It seems a bit confusing, but I’ll try it out. Fork99 (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I’m really close to getting it, but there’s one small problem in the testcase Template:Rail-interchange/testcases. How do I fix that there’s a colour icon next to the sandbox, but not the actual line? Thanks, Fork99 (talk) 06:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Or is it already done and I just need to submit a request in the talk page, then the icon will appear there? I ask because another testcase is marked as testing, but their icons were there, so I assume I was doing something wrong, but I think that they forgot to change it to implemented? If so, then I’m done? Fork99 (talk) 06:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Fork99: No problem - that is exactly what it should be as it does not exist in the current system. I have added Tonsley to the testcases and it shows in the current system but not in the new one. BUT Tonsley in the existing system already shows the wrong default colour as it has already been removed from Template:Adelaide color, You would need to explain that when you make your submission as that is a question the admin is likely to ask.Fleet Lists (talk) 06:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help! I’ve put the request through. Fork99 (talk) 07:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Move request discussion request

Hey there,

Could you please consider adding to the discussion at Talk:Metlink#Requested move 31 December 2020? Cheers, Fork99 (talk) 23:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

IP editor

Hey Fleet List. I see you've encountered an IP editor 124.187.21.179 taking great chunks out of articles with F-bomb heavy edit summaries. I'm not an admin so I can't do much, but if they stick around I'll try to flag it somewhere. If you can, could you keep an eye out for them as well please? Ta doktorb _words^deeds 07:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Camellia railway station

Hey there, I’m confused on why you reverted my edit when Parramatta Light Rail Stage 2 was confirmed a while ago to have been truncated from Strathfield to Olympic Park? Fork99 (talk) 12:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

{{ping:Fork99))Your edit removed a reference which admittedly did not work. I found that it had been incorrectly archived which I corrected. So as far I could see it now again confirms what it intended to conform in the first place so that the citation needed was no longer required. If there has been a change in circumstances, which I can nor confirm, that should be shown as additional information with a CN without the removal of the existing reference.Fleet Lists (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

For services to postcodes

	Going postal!
	Thanks for your work on those new postcodes Kerry (talk) 09:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Cameroon Locos

Can you help with Camrail locomotive fleet. Texts and pictures do not always show locomotive details such as horsepower and road numbers and classes. ----MountVic127 (talk) 01:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@MountVic127:Sorry, totally out of my area of knowledge.Fleet Lists (talk) 02:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Fleet lists

I was wondering if you operate this site (one I've found very useful for finding set numbers). I was going to ask if you have any intention of updating it, though I suppose the information on your userpage can infer an answer. Kind regards, thorpewilliam (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Adjacent stations/NSW TrainLink regional

Module:Adjacent stations/NSW TrainLink regional has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Fleets List

I understand that you’ve been retired since 2021, however I have left a message at User talk:Fleets List involving this account. If you do read this, thanks for all your hard work on Wikipedia over the years. Cheers, Fork99 (talk) 04:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

By the way, if you ever do return, please be sure to have a look at WikiProject Australian Transport. Thanks, Fork99 (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)