User talk:Dravecky/Archive 62
|
April 2014
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 | Archive 65 |
The Signpost: 02 April 2014
- WikiProject report: Deutschland in English
- Special report: On the cusp of the Wikimedia Conference
- Featured content: April Fools
- Traffic report: Regressing to the mean
The Signpost: 09 April 2014
- News and notes: Round 2 of FDC funding open to public comments
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Law
- Special report: Community mourns passing of Adrianne Wadewitz
- Traffic report: Conquest of the Couch Potatoes
- Featured content: Snow heater and Ash sweep
Madison Rising
Good morning. I noticed you Undid my editing of the Madison Rising Page. I changed some things to make it more unbiased and fact based. I would appreciate it if you leave my edits be, unless you have some sort of personal stake in the article. If you have an issue with anything that I correct on that page, please let me know. I am trying to eliminate the controversy and make it as clean and unbiased as possible. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djabram (talk • contribs) 12:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- You removed referenced text without explanation. You don't own the article and I have no personal stake in it but I will defend any article in Wikipedia from apparent vandalism, even if it's well-intentioned. Also, please sign your comments on talk pages (with four tildes) so people can know that the comments are yours and when you left them. Thanks. - Dravecky (talk) 19:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the explination. I am fairly new to editing. I have done a little before...., I removed the "See also" section of this article because they seemed inflamatory, deragatory, and there is no evidence to substantiate linking that article to the references. I changed the wording of the article, because it is also filled with disputed information. I do not believe any of my changes can be factually disputed I appreciate your assistance and admire your dedication to ensuring Wikipedia remains a credible source of information. Please understand I am not trying to vandalize that page,I am simply trying to ensure it is actually correct. I will continue to learn to ensure I am following correct procedure. djabram 10:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Please see my extended comment at Talk:Madison Rising - Dravecky (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
An adorable kitteh for you!
Thanks for the help on the Madison Rising page. In haste, I may have reverted some of your work yesterday. Sincere apologies!
Cypella (talk) 04:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- No worries. I've fixed up the references, cleaned up the prose, and fixed the "see also" section. Rather than a long list of vaguely related terms here, it would be better if you could find a way to include them in a few sentences integrated to the prose. - Dravecky (talk) 14:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Indoor Football League
I hope I'm not stepping on your toes at all in my recent IFL edits. I gave them all some structure. I'd love your input on what I've done. DMC511 16:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- No worries! I'm happy to see I'm not the only Wikipedian working on these articles. - Dravecky (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Fresh Eyes requested
Hello, I was wondering if you would mind taking a look at ongoing peer review on the WINC (AM) article. The article was promoted to GA status on April 10 and this is the PR prior to going to FAC.
The reviewer on the article, User:Finetooth, doesn't know much about radio stations and User:Casliber (the GA reviewer) says it looks a little "rough" still. Both agree a third set of eyes would be helpful, so we have pinged and messaged User:Hamiltonstone and User:Mlaffs, but since you work on radio station articles, I'm hoping you might be able to help as well. Thanks in advance...Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:40, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have indeed had a look and left comments at that peer review page, if you want to check those out. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- There is a lull in the PR, so if you seen anything that needs changed, please let me know and I will hop right to it. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 09:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2014
- Special report: 2014 Wikimedia Conference—what is the impact?
- News and notes: Wikimedian passes away
- WikiProject_report: To the altar—Catholicism
- Wikimania: Winning bid announced for 2015
- Traffic report: Reflecting in Gethsemane
- Featured content: There was I, waiting at the church
April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madison Rising may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- <ref name="lvrj140418">{{cite news |first=Keith |last=Rogers |newspaper=[[Las Vegas Review-Journal |title=Bundy supporters party, welcome ‘domestic terrorist’ label |url=
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
References/Sources
Hi Dravecky,
I feel guilty adding so many links and then leaving it to you to do whatever it is you're doing to them. What's it called? I assume there's a tutorial somewhere...? I'd love to help.
Also, I'm not comfortable with the neologistic genre "Patriotic Rock". I was an AM/FM DJ too (30 yrs. in Tokyo.) Never heard 'a that beast. Why not call a spade a spade and just leave it as the title of the linked page, American patriotic music? Awaiting your always measured judgement. Cheers! Cypella (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Reference list
Hi Dravecky,
I just wanted to apologize for reverting you there, I wasn't aware the different method is fine,
I disagree with it but I'm pretty sure edit warring is going to solve nothing lol,
Anyway thanks,
Regards, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2014
- News and notes: WMF's draft annual plan turns indigestible as an FDC proposal
- Traffic report: Going to the Doggs
- Breaking: The Foundation's new executive director
- WikiProject report: Genetics
- Interview: Wikipedia in the Peabody Essex Museum
- Featured content: Browsing behaviours
- Recent research: Wikipedia predicts flu more accurately than Google
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 | Archive 65 |